- Joined
- Nov 11, 2020
- Messages
- 460 (0.31/day)
- Location
- Earth, Solar System, Milky Way Galaxy, Local Group
Processor | AMD Ryzen 7 5700X |
---|---|
Motherboard | Asus TUF Gaming B550M-Plus (Wi-Fi) |
Cooling | Thermalright PA120 SE; Arctic P12, F12 |
Memory | Crucial BL8G32C16U4W.M8FE1 ×2 |
Video Card(s) | Sapphire Nitro+ RX 6600 XT |
Storage | Kingston SKC3000D/2048G; Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-000L2; Seagate ST1000DM010-2EP102 |
Display(s) | AOC 24G2W1G4 |
Case | Sama MiCube |
Audio Device(s) | Somic G923 |
Power Supply | EVGA 650 GD |
Mouse | Logitech G102 |
Keyboard | Logitech K845 TTC Brown |
Software | Windows 10 Pro 1903, Dism++, CCleaner |
Benchmark Scores | CPU-Z 17.01.64: 3700X @ 4.6 GHz 1.3375 V scoring 557/6206; 760K @ 5 GHz 1.5 V scoring 292/964 |
Hey, guys. I've been looking forward to Navi 23-based 6600 XT for such a long time, and I just found that there are different data of the number of ROP of Navi 23.
The number of ROP is always 64 on 6600M, W6600 and W6600M in our TPU database, while it's not the same at the VideoCardz - it's 64 on 6600M, but 32 on W6600 and W6600M.
And I think they are both not evidence-supported enough.
Could it be that AMD cut half of the ROP on workstation models and leave full spec on gaming models?
What do you think of this? And I'm looking forward to some convincing replies.
The number of ROP is always 64 on 6600M, W6600 and W6600M in our TPU database, while it's not the same at the VideoCardz - it's 64 on 6600M, but 32 on W6600 and W6600M.
And I think they are both not evidence-supported enough.
Could it be that AMD cut half of the ROP on workstation models and leave full spec on gaming models?
What do you think of this? And I'm looking forward to some convincing replies.