• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

RyZen 3000 Boost Issue: What's your take?

RyZen 3000 Boost Issue: What's your take?

  • AMD bad marketing at it again, false advertising and lies should not be tolerated.

  • AMD bad marketing alright, they need to inform consumer/media/reviewersbetter

  • It is fine, this is fine. I am OK with AMD advertising like that because I DON'T CARE

  • There should be MORE Advertising like this. Necessary evil is needed to beat Intel

  • MY BLOOD IS RED! SHUT UP AND TAKE MY MONEY AMD

Results are only viewable after voting.
D

Deleted member 185158

Guest
Nordic said:
I know techpoweup did a review with smt off. I did my own testing. I found no difference in average single threaded benchmark scores. For example Cinebench r20 averaged 500 points with and without smt. Multithreaded performance suffered without smt though.
Click to expand...

SMT is a nice featuer for sure.

Still trying to find a game that would scale the 16 thread cpu I have lol.

Only F@H gives me real world 16 thread scaling ( to my personal needs)
 
HTC

HTC

Joined
Apr 1, 2008
Messages
4,668 (0.76/day)
Location
Portugal
System Specs
System Name HTC's System
Processor Ryzen 5 5800X3D
Motherboard Asrock Taichi X370
Cooling NH-C14, with the AM4 mounting kit
Memory G.Skill Kit 16GB DDR4 F4 - 3200 C16D - 16 GTZB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Pulse 6600 8 GB
Storage 1 Samsung NVMe 960 EVO 250 GB + 1 3.5" Seagate IronWolf Pro 6TB 7200RPM 256MB SATA III
Display(s) LG 27UD58
Case Fractal Design Define R6 USB-C
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair TX 850M 80+ Gold
Mouse Razer Deathadder Elite
Software Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS
the54thvoid said:
I'm terribly disappointed my chip does not stay at the advertised base clock. I'm not overclocking it and it has the cheek to run at 4.2Ghz on all 8 cores while playing PUBG (and giving me very constant fps). I'm outraged by this foolish boosting process. I mean - it has an advertised base of 3.6Ghz - so shouldn't it stay at that unless I overclock it? False advertising AMD: base clock should be what it says, not 16% higher.

Please apply sarcasm tags and let people figure out that the boost issue is a non-issue. My single core boost is 4.367 (that's 4.4Ghz in round-up language).
Click to expand...

Don't you hate it when that happens?

AMD ... really ... the nerve ...
 
Nordic

Nordic

Joined
Jun 27, 2011
Messages
6,781 (1.37/day)
System Specs
Processor 7800x3d
Motherboard Gigabyte B650 Auros Elite AX
Cooling Custom Water
Memory GSKILL 2x16gb 6000mhz Cas 30 with custom timings
Video Card(s) MSI RX 6750 XT MECH 2X 12G OC
Storage Adata SX8200 1tb with Windows, Samsung 990 Pro 2tb with games
Display(s) HP Omen 27q QHD 165hz
Case ThermalTake P3
Power Supply SuperFlower Leadex Titanium
Software Windows 11 64 Bit
Benchmark Scores CB23: 1811 / 19424 CB24: 1136 / 7687
ShrimpBrime said:
SMT is a nice featuer for sure.

Still trying to find a game that would scale the 16 thread cpu I have lol.

Only F@H gives me real world 16 thread scaling ( to my personal needs)
Click to expand...
I don't think smt will be useful for gaming at this thread count for a long time. Smt is useful for other things
 
biffzinker

biffzinker

Joined
Mar 23, 2016
Messages
4,845 (1.50/day)
System Specs
Processor Core i7-13700
Motherboard MSI Z790 Gaming Plus WiFi
Cooling Cooler Master RGB something
Memory Corsair DDR5-6000 small OC to 6200
Video Card(s) XFX Speedster SWFT309 AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT CORE Gaming
Storage 970 EVO NVMe M.2 500GB,,WD850N 2TB
Display(s) Samsung 28” 4K monitor
Case Phantek Eclipse P400S
Audio Device(s) EVGA NU Audio
Power Supply EVGA 850 BQ
Mouse Logitech G502 Hero
Keyboard Logitech G G413 Silver
Software Windows 11 Professional v23H2
Aquinus said:
1.9% single threaded increase for an 18% decrease in multi-core throughput. Doesn't seem like a worthwhile tradeoff. I would run it another 2 time for each because you might find that the numbers are within error on the single-thread side.
Click to expand...
I tried again a couple of more times and I'm not getting the bump on single thread.
132407


132408


Geekbench 5.0.1
132409


132410


132411
 
Last edited:
biffzinker

biffzinker

Joined
Mar 23, 2016
Messages
4,845 (1.50/day)
System Specs
Processor Core i7-13700
Motherboard MSI Z790 Gaming Plus WiFi
Cooling Cooler Master RGB something
Memory Corsair DDR5-6000 small OC to 6200
Video Card(s) XFX Speedster SWFT309 AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT CORE Gaming
Storage 970 EVO NVMe M.2 500GB,,WD850N 2TB
Display(s) Samsung 28” 4K monitor
Case Phantek Eclipse P400S
Audio Device(s) EVGA NU Audio
Power Supply EVGA 850 BQ
Mouse Logitech G502 Hero
Keyboard Logitech G G413 Silver
Software Windows 11 Professional v23H2
ShrimpBrime said:
All the multi thread scores are nnearly the same? Is SMT just off on all these screen shots anf if so in conparison to your first test then?
Click to expand...
Yeah, I switched SMT off again to check the variation. Didn't know about the .01 update which is showing a higher single thread score though.
 
D

Deleted member 185158

Guest
Yea thats something that makes a difference. A benchmark that updates and changes scoring is not really great for testing with imo.

Maybe try single thread cinebench or wprime or pimod something of that nature. Good known stable benchmarks.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top