Share your AIDA 64 cache and memory benchmark here

[nightriderjt]

Memory speed at stock (1600) cpu oc at 4.5

AIDA version 4.70

 

[CrAsHnBuRnXp]

Here is my CPUz for the machine and here is my mem & cache benchmark. Memory is 1866MHz originally bumped up to 2133.

 

[The N]

@itsakjt

i installed 4.7v of AIDA64 but its trial and some of fields are filled with TRIAL VErsion text

 

[itsakjt]

Memory speed at stock (1600) cpu oc at 4.5

AIDA version 4.70View attachment 59972

Here is my CPUz for the machine and here is my mem & cache benchmark. Memory is 1866MHz originally bumped up to 2133.

Scores are added.

@itsakjt

i installed 4.7v of AIDA64 but its trial and some of fields are filled with TRIAL VErsion text

Yes. Copy the licence files from the previous version into the new installation folder. Else you will have to buy the software.

 

[Athlonite]

Here my new one running 8GB of Mushkin blackline 2400MHz DDR3 @ 11-13-13-31

going to set CR to 1 and rerun the test to see if makes much of a difference

 

[Athlonite]

Memory speed at stock (1600) cpu oc at 4.5

AIDA version 4.70

Increase your North Bridge speed to 2600MHz and you'll get a good boost in performance

 

[emissary42]

 

[nightriderjt]

Increase your North Bridge speed to 2600MHz and you'll get a good boost in performance

I could not. I get BSOD . I even gone the voltage from 1.85 to 1.2 but again bsod.

 

[nightriderjt]

I gone the timings lower. i got something better in Read Copy and L3 cache but worse now in L1 and L2. Should i keep the lwoer timings or it does not worth for the L2 and L1??

 

[vega22]

cache is cpu dude not ram.

while faster ram will help cpu performance a little is counteracted by the fact your cpu is 100mhz slower in the 2nd run.

 

[nightriderjt]

cache is cpu dude not ram.

while faster ram will help cpu performance a little is counteracted by the fact your cpu is 100mhz slower in the 2nd run.

I know it is cpu . :O i forgot i rolled back to 4.4 some days ago.

Should i try to lower timings more or is there any danger?They are stable at 9.

 

[vega22]

8 is better

tbh dude if i was you i would see how much head room you have pushing them higher speeds as that cpu will kep scaling past 1866mhz.

but the only real way to know what is best for you is to test.

you might find your ram will do cas7 at 1600 or cas 9 at 2133, until you try you never know.

for my system somethings bench better at 1600 cas 6, others 2400 cas 9 as some stuff loves the bandwidth while others want low latency.

 

[Johan45]

I know this isn't the most current version itsakjt but it's what I had at the time.

 

[Athlonite]

I could not. I get BSOD . I even gone the voltage from 1.85 to 1.2 but again bsod.

I see now why you can't I should have paid more attention to the type of mobo your running take it easy on that 970 you don't want to cook the VRM

 

[Xpredator]

There goes mine:

 

[Henkenator68NL]

Oke I was playing with my x79 Rampage IV extreme black edition, with 4930K and 4 x 4Gb Dominator Platinum 2133 CL9.

Got to a very stable bc
lk around 160Mhz, dram started scaleling very nice. Still playing with timings, but I think the result for now is great.

 

[Steevo]

New run for me.

 

[Seba_i5K]

My contribution from my 1yo machine

Memory: 2x8Gb Kingston HyperX Beast @2133MHz

 

[Toothless]

Update for you! This is with my current rig.

 

[pegadroid88]

bad or normal?
2 x 4 GB CORSAIR CMD8GX3M2A1600C8

 

[BassBoost1981]

meine 4x 4GB G.Skill Ripjaws 4 (F4-2666C15Q-16GRR)

 

[Schmuckley]

 

[The N]

Asrock z77 Extreme 6
i7 2600K @5.1GHz
Gskill RipJAws X 2x4GB @2133mhz @9.10.9 latency Timing

 

[Henkenator68NL]

Is the frontpage / result list still being updated ???

 

[Ebo]

all at stock