Share your CPUZ Benchmarks!

[phanbuey]

 

[infrared]

 

[NSX05]

A8-6600K at stock. (3.90 GHz base / 4.20 GHz ST / 4.10 GHz MT)

This is with a s**t ton of programs running, including Opera with 28 tabs, and whatever else you see in the taskbar.

 

[Losi]

I7 4790K @5GHz 102,1*49

 

[wally_1973]

I have not seen any ryzen go beyond 4,1Ghz.. surely it must be possible to go higher with BIOS updates / Microcode updates.

 

[infrared]

There's plenty that can do more than 4.1, but unless you won the silicon lottery you need to be quite harsh on the vcore to get there, and cpuz benchmark isn't worth it really. I can do a run at 4.2 if you want to see.

edit:

 

[dayathor]

this is my fx 6300 @4.3 ghz

 

[NSX05]

Now that the Creator's Update has become widespread, the CPU-Z benchmark scores as a whole should be improving slightly*. But remember that this is a simple integer benchmark which uses SSE2. It means absolutely nothing in the real world.

* For Ryzen

 

[mcraygsx]

There's plenty that can do more than 4.1, but unless you won the silicon lottery you need to be quite harsh on the vcore to get there, and cpuz benchmark isn't worth it really. I can do a run at 4.2 if you want to see.

edit:

View attachment 86412

Amazing what are your temps like with 4.1Ghz ?

 

[infrared]

Amazing what are your temps like with 4.1Ghz ?

That 4.2ghz was far from stable to be fair
4.1ghz is about the limit i can reach with 100% load on this particular chip.. at 1.50V it's getting to 70c (cpu diode) after 5 minutes with aida (cpu/fpu/cache selected). That's with a very good custom loop though so I guess the only thing you can take away from this is that heat transfer from die to heat spreader is excellent! For comparison: At 4ghz 1.41v it'll get to 59c with aida.

 

[mcraygsx]

That 4.2ghz was far from stable to be fair
4.1ghz is about the limit i can reach with 100% load on this particular chip.. at 1.50V it's getting to 70c (cpu diode) after 5 minutes with aida (cpu/fpu/cache selected). That's with a very good custom loop though so I guess the only thing you can take away from this is that heat transfer from die to heat spreader is excellent! For comparison: At 4ghz 1.41v it'll get to 59c with aida.

AMD did a fantastic job with soldering. Temps are far better then my 6900k setup

 

[CS85]

This is my 3770K@4.6Ghz
Temps are pretty good-under 70c with Hyper 212, although it is pretty cold in my house

 

[SonicBlaster]

i7-7700K@5200 / ASUS ROG MAXIMUS IX HERO

 

[NSX05]

I decided to spend more time seeing how much of an overclock I can get out of my A8-6600K. I have produced two graphs with my results; one for single-thread and one for multi-thread. For reference, I have also included many of the results provided in this thread. Credits are below.

• CPU-Z single-thread results
• CPU-Z multi-thread results

It seems my system doesn't like a BCLK over 113 MHz. All of my results are using an Enermax ETS-T40-TB air cooler, in combination with 16 GB of DDR3-1600 and a Gigabyte GA-F2A58M-HD2 motherboard. The other three mobile processors are systems I have access to in the house.


Result Credits:

• @dylricho — A8-6600K [stock]; all orange A8-6600K results; Core2 Duo T9300 [stock]; Celeron 250 [stock]; Athlon II P340 [stock].
• @Derek12 — Core i3-6100 [stock]; Atom N455 [stock]; Core i7-6600U [stock].
• @mcraygsx — Ryzen 7 1800X @ 4050 MHz.
• @jboydgolfer — Pentium G3258 Anniversary Edition @ 4800 MHz.
• @cdawall — Athlon Neo X2 L310 [stock]; Athlon 5350 [stock]; Athlon 5350 @ 2431 MHz.
• @chuck216 — Ryzen 7 1700X [stock].
• @vnl7 — Turion 64 X2 TL-60 [stock].
• @Toothless — Atom N270 [stock].
• @uuuaaaaaa — Pentium 4 HT Extreme Edition 3.40 @ 3834 MHz.
• @KainXS — Atom Z3736F [stock].
• @agent00skid — Phenom II N830 [stock].
• @buildzoid — Core i7-5700HQ [stock].
• @LightningJR — A8-4500M [stock].
• @Underdog — FX-9370 @ 5017 MHz.
• @sasamkd — Pentium III 1.00B [stock].
• @F-Zero — Pentium 4 2.67 @ 1355 MHz.
• @Steevo — Phenom II X6 1100T @ 4126 MHz.
• @PCGamerDR — A10-6800K @ 4551 MHz.
• @freakshow — A10-7860K @ 4624 MHz.
• All other results are taken from the CPU-Z benchmark baseline list.

 

[NSX05]

AMD boy u gotta switch to ryzen.............others chips are old crap.........specially in single core power

I'm not bothered. I paid £65 for the entire machine from a friend, including a monitor. And you can see by looking at the T9300, that it's already faster than my previous machine. I will be getting Ryzen at a later date. I make the most of what I have.

 

[Ithanul]

i7 5960X @ 4.6GHz

 

[NSX05]

I'm considering creating two graphs for the thread as a whole. Or would you prefer a table? Thoughts?

 

[NSX05]

CPU-Z got an update. Version 1.7.9.0 now has removed most of the baselines and the benchmark itself appears to have received an update. Broadwell-E now outperforms Summit Ridge.

I will be making graphs for single- and multi-thread results for the thread. All you need to do is post your scores and ensure I can see the CPU tab. I will only accept v1.7.9.× results.

I'll run my A8-6600K through its previous overclock configurations once again and add the three laptop systems in the house onto the graph. I'll be crediting users on the graph this time. Simpler.

(Sadly, this does mean we are lacking in the legacy CPU department now.)
(Also, I can't update my previous post with the old benchmark links to change the URLs, so if you need the old results, let me know.)

# Will update post with new graphs once complete.

 

[CAPSLOCKSTUCK]

7 year old Xeon X5670

stock speed 2.93ghz overclocked to 4.51ghz ( a tad over 50% )

Seems the scale has completely changed

heres what the scores were with an older version

 

[NSX05]

7 year old Xeon X5670

stock speed 2.93ghz overclocked to 4.51ghz ( a tad over 50% )

Seems the scale has completely changed

Holy crap, that's one hell of an overclock you have there. I'll be adding your result to the graphs.

 

[mcraygsx]

For sake of updated CPUZ, I ran the Bench again on 1800x w/Corsshair VI (Bios 1002).

 

[Ithanul]

With update CPU-Z.
5960X @ 4.6GHz

 

[Kliim]

at first sight it seems that the Intel are looking much better now with the new update in comparison to the AMD Ryzen's

 

[NSX05]

For sake of updated CPUZ, I ran the Bench again on 1800x w/Corsshair VI (Bios 1002).

Is that thread reading correct? Would it be possible to run the benchmark with SMT enabled?

at first sight it seems that the Intel are looking much better now with the new update in comparison to the AMD Ryzen's

Never mind Ryzen, AMD as a whole is suffering. I know the previous benchmark version utilized SSE2 at most. However, I've noticed in my 1.7.9.0 benchmark results that Piledriver struggles to keep up with Intel's Penryn architecture, even with its much higher clock frequency. I'm rather intrigued to find out if the new version is using SSE3, SSE4 or even AVX. Perhaps @Viking73 can help with ruling out the last one, if the benchmark runs under the AVX Offset values? Granted, since Penryn is pretty close to Piledriver now, I would assume that AVX isn't the culprit, even though I see people jump to conclusions all over message boards.

I can demonstrate the drop that Piledriver (my A8-6600K to be specific) has suffered by using my previous machine. It is equipped with a Core2 Duo T9300 at stock settings (2.50 GHz MT turbo; 2.70 GHz ST turbo). In 1.7.8.3, the APU at the slowest speed I tested (fixed 3.90 GHz) was ahead in single-thread by 27.1%. In multi-thread, it was ahead by 153.2%. In comparison for 1.7.9.0, the APU is now ahead in single-thread by only 4.2%, and in multi-thread by 76.9%.

I also ran the benchmark with the APU underclocked to 2.50 GHz and 2.70 GHz to see the difference on a 1:1 basis.

Regardless, here are the shiny, new graphs for CPU-Z version 1.7.9.0 and above:

CPU-Z v1.7.9.× — Single-Thread
CPU-Z v1.7.9.× — Multi-Thread
​

Additionally, the older graphs have been updated to credit users directly from the graph, and will permanently live here:

CPU-Z v1.7.8.× — Single-Thread
CPU-Z v1.7.8.× — Multi-Thread​

 

[jboydgolfer]

What the heck happened to cpuZ's bench scores ? They are like less than half of what they used to be if that

It looks like I'll have to run my bench again and seems they change the scaling of the results

Pentium 3258 4.7Ghz new CPU-z Ver. 1.79