• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Share your CPUZ Benchmarks!

Dia01 - CPUZ (4.5 Turbo 15-14-14-34).jpg


Fiddled with some of the BIOS settings, you were spot on phanbuey thanks :toast:
 
Dia01 said:
View attachment 97220

Fiddled with some of the BIOS settings, you were spot on phanbuey thanks :toast:
Click to expand...

additional things I have learned (you may already know these) but:

To get some impressive performance gain, see if you can drop your dimms' TRFC to around 300... lowers the overall latency of the system. Also mesh OC to 3-3.1 (you probably know this.)

run aida ram & latency before and after, and you will see what I mean. Big improvement in games & smoothness.
 
phanbuey said:
additional things I have learned (you may already know these) but:

To get some impressive performance gain, see if you can drop your dimms' TRFC to around 300... lowers the overall latency of the system. Also mesh OC to 3-3.1 (you probably know this.)

run aida ram & latency before and after, and you will see what I mean. Big improvement in games & smoothness.
Click to expand...


CPUZ Mesh 2.8.jpg


Played with the Mesh Ratio, set it at 2800. 3000 was unstable, 3200 impossible atm without fiddling more with voltages.
 
Last edited:
@Dia01 - added both of your results to the graphs.

I finally got mine after a long-awaited system restart. I don't really want to go any further on air, just for a number (it's not used overclocked).

Added the CPU-Z baselines in a dark slate color so as to make our own stand out better. After finally going through the baselines, I noticed that there was another typo. This time, apparently a so-called "i7-7900X" exists. :p

Also decided to benchmark my uncle's laptop. Sadly, I can't benchmark mine currently because my uncle is using it with Ubuntu on it, but it's a T9300; should be twice the performance of the Athlon there (CPU-Z numbers, of course). I'll stick my HDD back in it at some point and grab some numbers.
 
trickson said:
First off the hype and all the "good" stuff said about the AMD Ryzen ON TPU and other sites is the reason I went with the system! Do not precieve to think I went into this ignorant at all! I was told and by all the scores I seen that this CPU was better than a core i7 this thig can't even begin to compete with ANY Intel's Quad cores! I use Quad cores ONLY for Gaming. It is pointless to use anything with more cores.
I am in NO way seeing any of the speeds that I was told I would see! It is just not there! I have run the tests I have OC this to the MAX! The ONLY thing left is to max out the RAM modules with the MAX number and speed see if that will boost this CPU.
Click to expand...
More and more games getting optimized to use more cores. That's why I thought the used old Xeon's would be a good purchase and I was right. The Xeon E5-2680v1 performs extremely well with newer games that utilize all cores. Because of it's large L3 cache and relatively high frequency (3,2 on all cores) this CPU runs Battlefield 1 like a champ, even with the old R9-290. When combined with the GTX 1080 it outperforms the Ryzen 5 1600x by a fraction although it has a way lower ST en slightly lower MT score. Your quadcore should do great on most ( older) games, but for the newest games it will not be sufficient to run them on high settings. Also a GTX 1050 is a bare minimum for gaming. It is the videocard that runs your games and your CPU is the platform it runs on. If you buy a GTX 1070 you will need a CPU that does not bottleneck your GPU, like a I5 or i7 or R5 or R7.
I have not seen any benchmarks / reviews that claim the R3 1300x is a CPU to run GTA V or BF1 or Witcher 3. All reviews I have seen tell us these CPU's are good for low end gaming. They will bottleneck a GTX 1070 in several games. They perform as priced. AMD has made 6-8 core CPU's a lot cheaper in 2017 / 2018. If you wanna buy a CPU for gaming the I5-8400 is the CPU for budget gaming. Last year that was a 4 core 8 thread CPU like the I7-7700 and that will still be a great CPU for gaming. Thanx to DX12 the owners of FX cores can still game and wait for a Ryzen 2 or the new Intel's. Double your RAM and uitilize the dual channel speed up. Today 16GB is the way to go for gaming, BF1 already uses more than 10GB of system RAM in some maps. I do not know what games you are playing but my Ryzen 5 performs very well and since the last BIOS update the system performs even better. BF 1 runs smooth as can be on both my systems so go for 6 cores and 16GB. Unfortunatly RAM is very expensive right now, but it has been before and will return back to normal. Summertime vacation time is the best time to buy PC stuff. So wait till summer and buy an updated Ryzen with 6 or more cores or buy a second hand one (many will dump their first gen Ryzen to buy the new ones, I probably will).
 
Last edited:
wally_1973 said:
Your quadcore should do great on most ( older) games, but for the newest games it will not be sufficient to run them on high settings.
Click to expand...

It'll handle most games as well as an i5-6600, or i5-7500, at stock. Unlike these chips, it can be overclocked. All of them can push 60 frames/sec on high for most games. There are games that are poorly optimized that fall exception to this, of course, but you're still pretty good with an i5 in 2018.
 
standard run un-optimized, NOT after fresh boot, still pretty good

02182018-202150.jpg
 
bench.png
 
@ArbitraryAffection @er557 @grunt_408 @mouacyk - results added. :)

I now have the T9300 result. And for the sake of completeness, I decided to rerun my uncle's laptop and my own desktop overclock, complete with screenshots.





Athlon%20II%20P340%20%E2%80%94%20CPU-Z%201.83%20Result.png


Also, the benchmark really loves Penryn. I achieved a greater than perfect multi-core scaling result. K8 and K10 really suck for superscalar sequential SSE2.

 
Thanking you :)
 
Newest bench, max "safe" OC for my i7 6700K.

my_bench.jpg
 
Your results have been added to the 1.82 graphs. ;)
 
Ok.. I will get a full run up here soon, but here is a 7960X without HT enabled (16c/16t) @ 4.5 GHz...

cpuzrun.jpg
 
Your results have been added. :)
 
natr0n - clean 7 install tiny oc cpuz.PNG
 
Hey guys just built a new system, this should be in line for a 5,1GHz 8700K, right?

8700k.png
 
Old HP compaq DC7900. Nice build quality. I am wondering if I can get a quadcore running on it. Ordered a cheap Intel Xeon X5472. These chineze claim it should run on al Socket 775, we will see. This is nice to compare.
1520142677893.png
1520142687998.png
1520142696269.png
1520142741117.png
 
My 2010 "gaming laptop" , now it's only good for android game
Capture.JPG

Got this for my mom , for only $100 and add a cheap SSD , gotta love Used PC Market when everything is so expensive these days .

Capture.PNG
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top