- Joined
- Oct 27, 2009
- Messages
- 1,199 (0.22/day)
- Location
- Republic of Texas
| System Name | [H]arbringer |
|---|---|
| Processor | 4x 61XX ES @3.5Ghz (48cores) |
| Motherboard | SM GL |
| Cooling | 3x xspc rx360, rx240, 4x DT G34 snipers, D5 pump. |
| Memory | 16x gskill DDR3 1600 cas6 2gb |
| Video Card(s) | blah bigadv folder no gfx needed |
| Storage | 32GB Sammy SSD |
| Display(s) | headless |
| Case | Xigmatek Elysium (whats left of it) |
| Audio Device(s) | yawn |
| Power Supply | Antec 1200w HCP |
| Software | Ubuntu 10.10 |
| Benchmark Scores | http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1780855 http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2158678 http://ww |
That hardly makes a means of measurement pointless... You simply write more than the cache...
My SM951 is mlc but not 3dvnand ... I did steadystate for 32gb at stated speeds before getting bored.
So long as a cache is big enough that the underlying poor performance is never felt... well... what does it matter?
So long as the caveats for their performance are given (x burst size/ period of time) and the steady state results are known... I am fine with it.