- Joined
- Nov 13, 2006
- Messages
- 15,625 (2.36/day)
- Location
- Mid-Atlantic
System Name | Desktop |
---|---|
Processor | i5 13600KF |
Motherboard | AsRock B760M Steel Legend Wifi |
Cooling | Noctua NH-U9S |
Memory | 4x 16 Gb Gskill S5 DDR5 @6000 |
Video Card(s) | Gigabyte Gaming OC 6750 XT 12GB |
Storage | WD_BLACK 4TB SN850x |
Display(s) | Gigabye M32U |
Case | Corsair Carbide 400C |
Audio Device(s) | On Board |
Power Supply | EVGA Supernova 650 P2 |
Mouse | MX Master 3s |
Keyboard | Logitech G915 Wireless Clicky |
Software | Fedora KDE Spin |
OK, but, the report does highlight the areas that might have been manipulated, and not all the "damage" is in those areas. So...your point is what, exactly?
his point is nothing. he knows the "evidence" in that PDF would not hold up in court if he had to use it to protect himself.
that brings me to my point. Andy is afraid of being sued for damages because he manufactures ( or pays someone to manufacture) a highly abrasive product (often used to polish metal!) in a thermal paste. this guy made a HUGE miscalculation coming on TPU throwing around threats and acting like he understands image forensics. he doesn't even understand the report he paid for!!