- Joined
- Aug 22, 2008
- Messages
- 2,304 (0.38/day)
- Location
- Edmonton, Alberta
System Name | AMD | Intel | Chumpy |
---|---|
Processor | PHII 955BE Stock | i7 920 D0 4.01 GHz | i7 920 D0 4.01 GHz |
Motherboard | MSI 790FX-GD70 | EX58 - UD5 | E760 4 Way SLI |
Cooling | Zalman 9700 CNPS | Water Loop | Water Loop |
Memory | 4 GB XMS3 1600 MHz | 6 GB Dominators 1600 MHz | 6 GB Dominators 1866 MHz |
Video Card(s) | 3 x 9600GSO, GTX260 216 | 2 x GTX 260 216 | GTX 260 216, 9600 GSO |
Storage | WD 640GB | Couple o' 5400RPMs | WD 1TB |
Case | Cosmos S | Lancool K62 Dragonlord | Lian Li PC-P80 Armor |
Power Supply | TX850 | HX 1000 | HX 1000 |
Software | Win 7 Home Premium | Win 7 Ultimate | Vista Home Premium |
I hate all of these 1888 pt WUs, they bring the 8800GT down from the 5500 PPD it gets on 353pt WUs down to at the best case 4000, but usually lower. The only redeemable feature is that then run the card a lot cooler (~65c @ 30% fan vs ~82c @ 45% for the 353s)
A question I had about the 472 pt WUs, my 8800GT got one last night and I experienced something very odd. The PPD fluctuated wildly, between about 2900 and 4700, hanging around ~4100 most of the time. There seemed to be no correlation between PPD and temperature and fan speed (set to automatic) Why is this?
If all of my cards get loaded down with 1888s, I lose ~10000 PPD. I have yet to see what a slew of 511s does to me, but I bet it isn't pretty.
I believe the 472 pointers aren't consistent and spend much of their time surging (doing some frames faster, some slower). Because FaHmon bases PPD on the last frame, or 3 frames (or other depending on your setting) this results in jumping numbers. I believe there is a setting that averages your PPD out over the entirety of the work unit though I choose not to use it. I can see problems quicker if they're set to always base PPD on the last 3 frames.