• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

TPU's Nostalgic Hardware Club

@Vayra86 in the Netherlands if remember right?

 
Finally had the new ram for my D5400XS system show up, Kingston 16GB 4x4GB DDR2-667FB. At last some quad-channel goodness for this board. Got it for a good price too, just $20 CAD.

snaphsot0003.png


I also went ahead and cleaned up the cabling a bit and swapped the GTX 295 for an HD 5970 since my Dual GTX 295 plan didn't work out. Still need to get a new HDD.

20200214_172635.jpg
 

Attachments

  • PRW-FM20-16.jpg
    PRW-FM20-16.jpg
    2 MB · Views: 223
  • PRW-FM20-17.jpg
    PRW-FM20-17.jpg
    730.9 KB · Views: 172
  • PRW-FM20-18.jpg
    PRW-FM20-18.jpg
    21.4 KB · Views: 212
Last edited:
Love those boards with the separate VRM, have a couple

GA-8PENXP 478 board and a GA-K8NXP-9 939

Had a board like yours but it was unstable.
 

Attachments

Got me something special. :D

Gigabyte GA-7NNXP REV 1.0, Bigger FAN on the NB,...


@Robert B
I grabbed out my GA-NNXP after reading bigger NB fan at your post, but i see no difference to my regular one.


GA-NNXP_001.jpgGA-NNXP_004.jpgGA-NNXP_005.jpg

The GA-IK1100, for example, has a NB Cooler than is double as high as on the NNXP (Sorry, no images at the moment, that is my "daily driver" XP machine).
My NNXP is a candidate for a blue alien style PC case, but at the moment I am building a 939 crossfire system.
 
I'll take better pictures this week. I'm pretty sure the fan is thicker on my board. The previous owner changed the fan.

On the left is my motherboard and on the right yours.

Also to make the Tt Volcano 9 fit on this motherboard, the previous owner shaved a little from the side of the cooler. I approve of this! :D Once I start to restore it I'll make sure that the area will be polished and perfectly straight.

Only good quality caps are all over the board so I won't need to change any of them. WIN!
 

Attachments

  • PRW-FM20-20.jpg
    PRW-FM20-20.jpg
    489 KB · Views: 203
  • PRW-FM20-21.jpg
    PRW-FM20-21.jpg
    1.1 MB · Views: 139
I'll take better pictures this week. I'm pretty sure the fan is thicker on my board. The previous owner changed the fan.

On the left is my motherboard and on the right yours.

Only good quality caps are all over the board so I won't need to change any of them. WIN!

Your are right, seems your board has a 40x40x20mm fan instead of a 40x40x10mm fan. And the metal fins are quite different.

Now I attach an image of the larger IK1100 NB cooler (P4, Intel 875) and a cheap passiv NB cooler version of a Gigabyte board with VIA chipset.
GIGABYTE_NB_001.jpgGIGABYTE_NB_002.jpg
And yes, Gigabyte boards of that time had good quality caps.
 
LOL Intel went to all the bother of cranking the CPU socket 45* for the BTX computers, and AMD systems just turned the Northbridge chip!
 
The NB heatsink looks to be original. Anyway I'll see what's what when I take it apart for cleaning.

At full speed that Tt Volcano 9 really is a volcano in the noise department. :D I'll definitely use a Low Noise Adapter in the future. :D
 

Attachments

  • PRW-FM20-22.jpg
    PRW-FM20-22.jpg
    294.7 KB · Views: 164
  • PRW-FM20-19.jpg
    PRW-FM20-19.jpg
    1.1 MB · Views: 207
Anyone on the forum use this laptop?

 
Nice.
I have Asus P4T and Abit TH-7 Raid. :)
Socket 423 had a very short run.
 
I found the long-lost wall charger for this time machine (Palm Tungsten TX). Suddenly you realise just how far we've come with smartphone technology when you fire up one of these. The wifi standard it uses is so old that it can't even find the local network, it has a skeleton selection of basic applications and having to use a stylus is pretty tedious. And it doesn't have the ability to make phone calls. I used to love these things back in the day but now Palm and pocket PCs in general are dead for good reason.

20200222_105701.jpg
 
Not sure if this is the right forum but does anybody know why a qx6800 would not work in Intel dg41rq motherboard everywhere on line even PC partpicker says it's compatible but when I tried it I got the message PC is not supported
 
I looked around in here.
And didn't see any Core 2 Extreme CPUs in the first 300 listings. Usually this indicates a MB with a 95W CPU limit.
The G41 chipset supports Xeon swaps and I didn't see any of the X5460,X5470 swaps that would show 120W CPUs either.
It's possible the best 4 Core for that will be The Q9650, X3370, or LGA771 X5450,E5450,
The E7500 with a pinmod to 3.68Ghz will be much faster then any of those in single tread apps. It beats my Xeon X5470 in those.
But if you just want some old school cheap thrills, a Q6600 G0 can be tape modded to 3GHz which is a tick faster than the base clock on the QX6800. But really about 10% less computing power than the newer CPUs.
If you can raise Voltage in the BIOS then the forgotten Q6700 which are all G0 will get you 3.33Ghz. But most 95W MB are pretty locked down.
Maybe a moddded BIOS can remove the limit.
 
Last edited:
Not sure if this is the right forum but does anybody know why a qx6800 would not work in Intel dg41rq motherboard everywhere on line even PC partpicker says it's compatible but when I tried it I got the message PC is not supported
That one is easy answer, but the answer is not easily verified. The QX6800 is a 130W TDP CPU. The G41 chipset generally only supported up to 95W CPU's. As @Retrorockit suggested above, it would be best for you to limit yourself to a 95W CPU for that board. The Q9450, Q9550 or Q9650 would all be excellent choices for that board.

However, if you already have the CPU, then replacing the board is the better course of action.
 
I'm using a Dell Optiplex 380 which is a G41 also. They only sold it as 2 core 4GB RAM and didn't bother to install the 95W limit that other Optiplexes of that era had. I have a 120W X5470 running in it. So it's not the chipset itself. But the fact that it only supports 2 RAM slots means it did lend itself to that market. As far as confirming goes userbenchmark is pretty good if there's a large enough sample. In fact that's where I found out the Opti 380 would suuport an X5460. I just took that a step further. I didn't look at all 970 examples to be sure but it was looking pretty consistent, and the fastest systems come first although that's usually an over the top GPU as much as anything else.
Geekbench 4 is another place to look for CPU s and overclocks.He can look into it further if he wants to , but it looks that way to me.
My problem is the pimodded E7500 in my system at Geekbench is running the RAM @ 1333, and mine only goes 1066.
Now i have to obsess over that! IDK if the pinmod does that too or if there's a newer BIOS?

Not sure if this is the right forum but does anybody know why a qx6800 would not work in Intel dg41rq motherboard everywhere on line even PC partpicker says it's compatible but when I tried it I got the message PC is not supported
The other issue you may have is Intel systems from that era needed low density RAM and that's getting hard to find now. I had some G Skill that worked, but when one failed the new kit (same part#) didn't work.
Crucial CT2K51264BD160B is an 8GB (2x4GB) low density kit that can run from DDR3-800 to DDR3-1600 speeds. 1.35V. also but can run as 1.5V. Working fine in my G41 Optiplex. But G41 came in DDR2 also. The same issue exists there.
 
Last edited:
I'm using a Dell Optiplex 380 which is a G41 also. They only sold it as 2 core 4GB RAM and didn't bother to install the 95W limit that other Optiplexes of that era had. I have a 120W X5470 running in it. So it's not the chipset itself.
That's Dell though. While the 95W limit is not hardcoded into the chipset, Intel did not intend for the G41 to handle/support the Xtreme CPU line. Intel did hardcode a lockout for the Xtreme CPU's on their own motherboards, IIRC.
 
I'm using a Dell Optiplex 380 which is a G41 also. They only sold it as 2 core 4GB RAM and didn't bother to install the 95W limit that other Optiplexes of that era had. I have a 120W X5470 running in it. So it's not the chipset itself. But the fact that it only supports 2 RAM slots means it did lend itself to that market. As far as confirming goes userbenchmark is pretty good if there's a large enough sample. In fact that's where I found out the Opti 380 would suuport an X5460. I just took that a step further. I didn't look at all 970 examples to be sure but it was looking pretty consistent, and the fastest systems come first although that's usually an over the top GPU as much as anything else.
Geekbench 4 is another place to look for CPU s and overclocks.He can look into it further if he wants to , but it looks that way to me.
My problem is the pimodded E7500 in my system at Geekbench is running the RAM @ 1333, and mine only goes 1066.
Now i have to obsess over that! IDK if the pinmod does that too or if there's a newer BIOS?


The other issue you may have is Intel systems from that era needed low density RAM and that's getting hard to find now. I had some G Skill that worked, but when one failed the new kit (same part#) didn't work.
Crucial CT2K51264BD160B is an 8GB (2x4GB) low density kit that can run from DDR3-800 to DDR3-1600 speeds. 1.35V. also but can run as 1.5V. Working fine in my G41 Optiplex. But G41 came in DDR2 also. The same issue exists there.
Its super easy to order low density unmarked brands on ebay. They do work well. I consider them at same level as Kingston value ram.
 
It's not the ram I have a q6600 pin moded in it now, I just thought theqx6800 would work to since there basically the same i have a optiplex 745 and the qx6800 works in it so I know it's not the processor it's probably the tdp
 
Back
Top