Unigine Heaven 4.0 Benchmark Scores

[fullinfusion]

Your score is very off. Is it a single or dual run

It shows as a single gpu.

 

[Durvelle27]

It shows as a single gpu.

He said it was two GPUs

 

[fullinfusion]

He said it was two GPUs

Yeah I seen that. Probably figured it was in crossfire mode but clearly the screen shot shows x1 for gpu and not x2

 

[Durvelle27]

Yeah I seen that. Probably figured it was in crossfire mode but clearly the screen shot shows x1 for gpu and not x2

Yep but i think he fixed it

 

[Droffz]

FX-8350 @5.1GHZ + GTX 780 1293/1850

Crazy what happens when you start messing with mem clocks...

I've been away on a trip for a buddy's surgery but when I get back I might try pushing it a bit more.

Grats dude. Also, if you don't mind my asking what program are you using to show the info on the top left? Thanks.

 

[Gribar]

i7 4770k @4.2 Ghz

EVGA GTX 780 SC (ACX) SLI:
-GPU 0: core 1027 mhz, boost 1080, est max 1196, memory 6008 mhz
-GPU 1: core 1027 mhz, boost 1080, est max 1157, memory 6008 mhz

16 GB Kingston hyper X @ 1600 mhz

 

[fullinfusion]

i7 4770k @4.2 Ghz

EVGA GTX 780 SC (ACX) SLI:
-GPU 0: core 1027 mhz, boost 1080, est max 1196, memory 6008 mhz
-GPU 1: core 1027 mhz, boost 1080, est max 1157, memory 6008 mhz

16 GB Kingston hyper X @ 1600 mhz

View attachment 53783

Welcome to TPU and nice score!

 

[Durvelle27]

MSI Afterburner / River Tuner

Crazy what happens when you start messing with mem clocks...

I've been away on a trip for a buddy's surgery but when I get back I might try pushing it a bit more.

Grats dude. Also, if you don't mind my asking what program are you using to show the info on the top left? Thanks.

 

[mdbrotha03]

Me

 

[broken pixel]

Some Red for the #2 spot. (Multi- GPU)

Dual XFX 290x @ 1155MHz/1500MHz +100mV +100mV(aux)- 3930k @ 4.7GHz/ 2133MHz

 

[sirbaili]

O.K.
3770k - 4.6ghz
R9-290 Crossfire 1100Ghz Memory - NO OC.

 

[Durvelle27]

Guys you must provide a in bench screen shot to be valid

 

[broken pixel]

Guys you must provide a in bench screen shot to be valid

It does not state in bench screen shot in your first post.

 

[Durvelle27]

It does not state in bench screen shot in your first post.

was stated a few posts back but it has been added to OP

 

[mdbrotha03]

Me again with more juice


!

Using this GPU

GIGABYTE GV-N780GHZ-3GD

 

[Durvelle27]

Weird why is it offcenter but score will be added

Me again with more juice

View attachment 53812
!View attachment 53811

 

[mdbrotha03]

I moved it to get a better picture of the dragon .

 

[Durvelle27]

Lol ok

I moved it to get a better picture of the dragon .

 

[mdbrotha03]

Haven't been added yet.

 

[Durvelle27]

Haven't been added yet.

I'm very busy you have to give me time but it has been updated

 

[Gribar]

There's something I still can't understand, I have 2 GTXs 780 SC (acx). I purchased the first one in july 2013, and the second one in december 2013, ok both cards have different ASIC quality, the first one is 58% and the second one is 75%, the card with the highest ASIC quality is capable of achieving higher core clock offset, but the card with the lowest ASIC quality only reaches +50 mhz and then it shows artifacts or crashes. The problem is that Unigine Heaven fps and score only change if I overclock the lowest card, I can push the fastest card to +200 mhz but it doesn't make a difference, for exaple:

Test 1:

GTX 780 SC with lowest ASIC quality: +50 mhz (max boost clock 1147 mhz)
GTX 780 SC with highest ASIC quality: +50 mhz (max boost clock 1196 mhz)

Results: UH score 2848 - avg FPS 113


Test 2:

GTX 780 SC with lowest ASIC quality: +50 mhz (max boost clock 1147 mhz)
GTX 780 SC with highest ASIC quality: +100 mhz (max boost clock 1252 mhz)

Results: UH score 2846 - avg FPS 112.9


Test 3:

GTX 780 SC with lowest ASIC quality: +70 mhz (max boost clock 1172 mhz)
GTX 780 SC with highest ASIC quality: +70 mhz (max boost clock 1206 mhz)

Results: UH score 2988 - avg FPS 117.4

Is there something I'm doing wrong???

 

[Durvelle27]

There's something I still can't understand, I have 2 GTXs 780 SC (acx). I purchased the first one in july 2013, and the second one in december 2013, ok both cards have different ASIC quality, the first one is 58% and the second one is 75%, the card with the highest ASIC quality is capable of achieving higher core clock offset, but the card with the lowest ASIC quality only reaches +50 mhz and then it shows artifacts or crashes. The problem is that Unigine Heaven fps and score only change if I overclock the lowest card, I can push the fastest card to +200 mhz but it doesn't make a difference, for exaple:

Test 1:

GTX 780 SC with lowest ASIC quality: +50 mhz (max boost clock 1147 mhz)
GTX 780 SC with highest ASIC quality: +50 mhz (max boost clock 1196 mhz)

Results: UH score 2848 - avg FPS 113


Test 2:

GTX 780 SC with lowest ASIC quality: +50 mhz (max boost clock 1147 mhz)
GTX 780 SC with highest ASIC quality: +100 mhz (max boost clock 1252 mhz)

Results: UH score 2846 - avg FPS 112.9


Test 3:

GTX 780 SC with lowest ASIC quality: +70 mhz (max boost clock 1172 mhz)
GTX 780 SC with highest ASIC quality: +70 mhz (max boost clock 1206 mhz)

Results: UH score 2988 - avg FPS 117.4

Is there something I'm doing wrong???

You really want clocks to mirror each other so try clocking them at the same clock

 

[Gribar]

I'ts supposed that Kepler architecture allows SLI setups to handle different clock speeds at the same time, that's why identical cards have different boost clocks, depending on chip quality

 

[Durvelle27]

Was just throwing out a suggestion bud

I'ts supposed that Kepler architecture allows SLI setups to handle different clock speeds at the same time, that's why identical cards have different boost clocks, depending on chip quality

 

[Bladedrummer]

Don't underestimate stability. You got the best results with the most stable clocks for both cards.

There's something I still can't understand, I have 2 GTXs 780 SC (acx). I purchased the first one in july 2013, and the second one in december 2013, ok both cards have different ASIC quality, the first one is 58% and the second one is 75%, the card with the highest ASIC quality is capable of achieving higher core clock offset, but the card with the lowest ASIC quality only reaches +50 mhz and then it shows artifacts or crashes. The problem is that Unigine Heaven fps and score only change if I overclock the lowest card, I can push the fastest card to +200 mhz but it doesn't make a difference, for exaple:

Test 1:

GTX 780 SC with lowest ASIC quality: +50 mhz (max boost clock 1147 mhz)
GTX 780 SC with highest ASIC quality: +50 mhz (max boost clock 1196 mhz)

Results: UH score 2848 - avg FPS 113


Test 2:

GTX 780 SC with lowest ASIC quality: +50 mhz (max boost clock 1147 mhz)
GTX 780 SC with highest ASIC quality: +100 mhz (max boost clock 1252 mhz)

Results: UH score 2846 - avg FPS 112.9


Test 3:

GTX 780 SC with lowest ASIC quality: +70 mhz (max boost clock 1172 mhz)
GTX 780 SC with highest ASIC quality: +70 mhz (max boost clock 1206 mhz)

Results: UH score 2988 - avg FPS 117.4

Is there something I'm doing wrong???