Unigine Heaven 4.0 Benchmark Scores

[Ja.KooLit]

3rd place on the Multi-GPU boards with a bit more overclocking. I think there's still a bit of head room left but I'm waiting on a cable so I can take control of my R9 295x2's VRM fan(no access stock, kind of silly on a card like this).

1x R9 295x2 @ 1130/1500
1x R9 290x @ 1175/1500
4770K @ 4.3

i doubt you have more headroom. look at your screenshot. artifacts already. thats a sign of too much oc.

 

[Chatelike]

I have the highest score single gpu but cant screenshot lol

 

[Honey]

hey bro's
i did unigen engine on my Asus Strix Gtx 970, i5 2310
are these scores are fine? or too bad?
is my CPU so bad?

 

[Seth Collen]

i doubt you have more headroom. look at your screenshot. artifacts already. thats a sign of too much oc.

Geez, can't believe I missed that. I've had that artifact in the same spot at lower clocks, adding a bit of voltage clears it up at the cost of temperature. As I said, once I can control the VRM fan on the 295 I'll be able to keep it cooler without artifacts. This benchmark was achieved on the second run, both were artifact free except for my screenshot somehow...

 

[GreiverBlade]

hey bro's
i did unigen engine on my Asus Strix Gtx 970, i5 2310
are these scores are fine? or too bad?
is my CPU so bad?

CPU play little in that benchmark, it's GPU bound ...
for me it looks like what you can expect from a stock 970 first run ...

As I said, once I can control the VRM fan on the 295 I'll be able to keep it cooler without artifacts.

pretty much doubt it ... my 290 under full waterblock artifact when around 1500+ RAM and 1150 GPU... so i really doubt that the VRM fan will give better result than a full block ... (yeah yeah i know 290X not 290)

 

[DreadGod]

how are you lads uploading this what you using im having to take phote's of screen to get it to work I hold NEW RECORD .
"had to edit" sry no x8 on my new test are now on getting 1716 with x8 on 5th now.

 

[GreiverBlade]

how are you lads uploading this what you using im having to take phote's of screen to get it to work I hold NEW RECORD .

suspecting a run without anti aliasing set on X8... so pretty much no... the highest 780Ti of the list is at 2057

re run correctly

screenshot : F12 then "C:/Users/username/heaven/screenshots" folder open the TGA with a imageviewer like IrfanView and convert it in JPG (CTRL-S)

also ... look at the resolution and AA settings ... on my shot

 

[Seth Collen]

(yeah yeah i know 290X not 290)

It's not even that, you're comparing a 290 to a 295x2. I know they're very similar but I also know the fan can spin faster than it is at these temps, confirmed by others on the 295 owners club threads.

My 290x would definitely begin to artifact on the clocks you mention when on stock air cooling but I was able to push it to 1200/1600 on water without artifacts leading me to believe I could go a little further(look at the single gpu leaderboard 290x's well above that as well).

 

[GreiverBlade]

It's not even that, you're comparing a 290 to a 295x2.

well ... still doubt it will help it ... also you just run a trifire 290X that's not really a huge difference technically

but indeed from a 290X to a 290 : little difference, at stock... it's 5% less GPU clocking (not my case ) 10% less MEM clocking (not my case bis) and 256 shader less (which is totally minimal loss)

i am comparing the COOLING NOT THE CARD!!! i use a full water block ... and the card still artifact after 1150/1500 (ie: 1210/1600) so yep ... not so big headroom for further OC (not mentioning that the 290 OC a bit better than a 290X since a 290X is just a OC'ed 290 with 256 shader added or a 290 is a underclocked 290X with 256 shaders disabled)

I was able to push it to 1200/1600 on water without artifacts leading me to believe I could go a little further(look at the single gpu leaderboard 290x's well above that as well).

silicon lottery xD (i hope your 295X2 will be the same ... )

edit yep totally worth to compare a 290 to a 290X (too bad i can't push it like that xD )
i7-3770K 5.0GHz R9 290X 1240/1600 1608 dr_dx
i5-2500K 4.2GHz R9 290 1240/1590 1589 Serhend

 

[DreadGod]

sry all this is my score never had it on" 8xaa" this is still set out of the box no oc yet ill do some oc and see what we get.

 

[DreadGod]

hi ok this is score, cpu out of box is 1006 gone to 1050 this is my score now

 

[Seth Collen]

edit yep totally worth to compare a 290 to a 290X (too bad i can't push it like that xD )
i7-3770K 5.0GHz R9 290X 1240/1600 1608 dr_dx
i5-2500K 4.2GHz R9 290 1240/1590 1589 Serhend

Agreed there's little difference between a 290 and a 290x, I was just saying that we're not all governed by that 1150/1500 limit as seen by the leaderboards and my personal experience. I'm just trying to say I have no control over the VRM fan on my 295 and I know it can spin faster, will that equal more OC'ing? I don't know yet but I'll be sure to post my findings.

 

[DreadGod]

ok this is with cpu setting 1085/1750 puts me 5th i think not bad for a PCLE 2.0 support on a p6t deluxe v2 mother board

 

[DreadGod]

ok this is my last don't won't to push it any more cpu set at 1100/1760

 

[BarbaricSoul]

ok this is with cpu setting 1085/1750 puts me 5th i think not bad for a PCLE 2.0 support on a p6t deluxe v2 mother board

ok this is my last don't won't to push it any more cpu set at 1100/1760

Actually, the 1724 score is only good for 20th place. I have 15th with 1768. That was with my 780ti OC'ed to 1300/1875.

 

[DreadGod]

Actually, the 1724 score is only good for 20th place. I have 15th with 1768. That was with my 780ti OC'ed to 1300/1875.

hi yes just seen it I was looking at first page before the new thread 20th ok for me im temped to oc more but new card don't won.t to damage it the temp seems to stay the same what ever clock I put it on. 64 c

 

[FX-GMC]

not that it matters much, but my last result I turned in was with a 3930k, not a 2600k

Fixed.


List updated.

 

[Seth Collen]

With the low temperatures in the teens today I managed to push the clocks a little further without artifacts and got two more points lol

1x R9 295x2 @ 1150/1500
1x R9 290x @ 1175/1500
4770K @ 4.3

 

[THE_EGG]

With the low temperatures in the teens today I managed to push the clocks a little further without artifacts and got two more points lol

1x R9 295x2 @ 1150/1500
1x R9 290x @ 1175/1500
4770K @ 4.3

wowwwwwww. Very nice man. I'm thinking the power consumption of your PC must be pretty high eh? haha. I was seriously considering going for 1 295X2 in case I decided on going to a mini-itx build again but decided on 2 gtx 970s just because I thought the dual gpu card could cause me grief and I've had a poor experience in the past when it comes to stuttering with crossfired AMD cards.

 

[Seth Collen]

wowwwwwww. Very nice man. I'm thinking the power consumption of your PC must be pretty high eh? haha. I was seriously considering going for 1 295X2 in case I decided on going to a mini-itx build again but decided on 2 gtx 970s just because I thought the dual gpu card could cause me grief and I've had a poor experience in the past when it comes to stuttering with crossfired AMD cards.

Thanks. My goal is to ding 4000, it's soo close. Yeaaa it uses quite a bit of power. I have a Corsair AX1200i and the highest values I've seen on it are 1150 draw from the wall and 1010 passed to the system.

 

[Ja.KooLit]

wowwwwwww. Very nice man. I'm thinking the power consumption of your PC must be pretty high eh? haha. I was seriously considering going for 1 295X2 in case I decided on going to a mini-itx build again but decided on 2 gtx 970s just because I thought the dual gpu card could cause me grief and I've had a poor experience in the past when it comes to stuttering with crossfired AMD cards.

R9 series AMD gpu is actually better now for crossfired AMD cards due to the XDMA engine. it is actually better than NVIDIA SLI

 

[Seth Collen]

R9 series AMD gpu is actually better now for crossfired AMD cards due to the XDMA engine. it is actually better than NVIDIA SLI

That and frame pacing has seemed to help out quite a bit. No stuttering or "micro-stuttering" some have complained about in the past.

 

[THE_EGG]

That and frame pacing has seemed to help out quite a bit. No stuttering or "micro-stuttering" some have complained about in the past.

R9 series AMD gpu is actually better now for crossfired AMD cards due to the XDMA engine. it is actually better than NVIDIA SLI

Ah right I see. I must admit, my experience with it was with 2 R9 280x cards so that could explain it. I see that the R9 290/290X series uses the newer (and I suppose better) stuff. The worst offender was Titanfall iirc, that was seriously unplayable. I haven't had any problems with SLI in games only that Sony Vegas likes to crash if SLI is enabled when rendering a video. Disabling SLI fixes it.

 

[Chatelike]

I claim the record for single GPU

CPU frequency: 4.4ghz
Gpu Frequencies: Core 1366: mem 4071

 

[BarbaricSoul]

I claim the record for single GPU

CPU frequency: 4.4ghz
Gpu Frequencies: Core 1366: mem 4071

quality is suppose to be set to ultra, not high