Unigine Heaven 4.0 Benchmark Scores

[FX-GMC]

I had saved it to my PC at the end of the benchmark then remembered you had to have the other two as well. I can run another one if you would like.

Please do. I fear of people calling foul if I let it slide.

 

[Schmuckley]

NVIDIA's S775 chipsets aren't that bad; the S2E and other similar boards (I have an EVGA 790i Ultra SLI aswell)
have a good rep in reviews & benches. I have a Q6600 and E8400 which work quite well, and indeed for a while
way back I'd pondered sorting out an oc'd E8400 as my next step up from a 6000+, given the E8400 easily runs
at 4.5. In the event, Nehelem came out, so I waited, bought a P55 setup instead.

What I'm interested in seeing is how a QX9650 can drive these GPUs compared to, say, an i5 760 and other 4-cores.

I also have a 965 and 1090T to test, but all in good time. Never enough hours in the day...

Ian.

Lynnfield will do better due to L3..
Deneb and Thuban is a different animal
I can't lie..I like my Deneb and Thuban especially..
4-5 years i still has my Thuban..It's the Cadillac of CPUs baby
FX chips ..eh..they just don't have the oomph dude..It's like AMD does Netburst ..5 years later n stuff

PS: Intel/AMD chipset> any Nvidia one..
there is 1 certain case where that does not apply..can someone help me out on remembering what that is?

 

[mapesdhs]

PS: Intel/AMD chipset> any Nvidia one..

Well, we shall see... Certainly though, NVIDIA's SATA ports aren't that quick.

But I read a lot of reviews, I really didn't see much sign of the 790i being worse than other boards for
gaming, etc., with the usual parts of the day.

Ian.

 

[Schmuckley]

I have seen many signs of Intel boards being better for OCing 775
Whether it's x38/48 or p45..always better

 

[mapesdhs]

X48 can reach a slightly higher FSB, but given both can get to at least 500, it doesn't really matter.
In reality, multipliers limit what one can do with any given CPU to a greater degree, unless one
has an unlocked chip. The Wolfdale E8400 was good though. And who remembers the popularity
of the Q6600? (I have a G0 waiting in line) The 45nm Q series was even better. Anyone want to
guess what a QX9650 will score with two 980s? (can't test with three anymore, one has been
deployed permanently)

As for performance, the chipsets are extremely close, usually within margins of error (X48 is often
fractionally ahead, but the gap is too small to really call 790i a loser, in which case other aspects
come into play, eg. the S2E was famous for its water cooling options & other features). See:

http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/x48-790i-chipset,review-30911-15.html
http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/x48-790i-chipset,review-30911-16.html
http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/x48-790i-chipset,review-30911-17.html


Anandtech's 2nd-last & last paras on this page are interesting:

http://www.anandtech.com/show/2500/6


It's basically a tie:

http://www.anandtech.com/show/2500/8

I waited a long time to find an S2E, they kept going for crazy money. Finally bagged one BIN
for 65, fully boxed, etc., which is weird given normal auctions at the time were going for 2X more.

Anyhoo, I'll finish testing the P55 setup with two 980s, fill in the P4 + GTX 460 gaps on my site,
then I'll see how embarassing it is to have a 980 with a P4/3.4. (haven't oc'd the P4 yet, anyone
recall doing that?)

Ian.

 

[TommyT]

I try to take a picture of my score but for some reason it want work.

my score is 814 .

 

[gasolin]

Are my score okay i7 4790k at 4.0 ghz on all cores no turbo and 2x asus gtx 680 dcu2 4gb stock core when gpu usage is low

My settings using evga precision because i can oc both cards differently that according to barnaculas nerdgasm should minimize microstutter

I think my score is very low so low that i think my gpu's don't runs as fast as they should (don't know why my gpu's don't score higher)


Here are som results from gpus close to my gtx 680 (gtx 670,770.....) to compare to my results

http://s1349.photobucket.com/user/BwwwJ1st/media/heaven_2013_07_26_15_50_55_630_zpsa15019ee.jpg.html

http://cdn.overclock.net/9/9d/500x1000px-LL-9da90209_stats.jpeg

 

[TommyT]

 

[gasolin]

Full screen makes a different

 

[RoccoBenchmark]

All in stock, i5-4690k / msi gtx 970 4gb

Is my score ok?

 

[gasolin]

My score in full screen ram about 400mhz + and gpu about 60mhz + (2x asus gtx 680 dcu2 4gb)

Fps 67.9
Score 1712
Min fps 27.9
Max score 164.2

 

[ZaiXai]

Sapphire R9 270 OC to 1025/1500

 

[Nightbeat]

2500 @stock & SAPPHIRE 7950 @ 1200MHz BOOST, 1320MHz MEM

 

[Cortana]

Cortana

Intel i7 4790K @ 4.7 GHz - MSI GTX 970 Gaming Edition @ 1561 Core / 2032 Memory - Corsair Vengeance Pro 16GB 2400Mhz - Score 1643

Let me know if there's anything I screwed up, please! thanks!!

 

[gasolin]

Cortana

Intel i7 4790K @ 4.7 GHz - MSI GTX 970 Gaming Edition @ 1561 Core / 2032 Memory - Corsair Vengeance Pro 16GB 2400Mhz - Score 1643

Let me know if there's anything I screwed up, please! thanks!!

View attachment 63259 View attachment 63260 View attachment 63258

So my 2x asus gtx 680 in sli (just slightly oc'ed) is better then a highly oc'ed gtx 970 might even be as good as a stock gtx 980, what is the score for a gtx 980? (but still not high end for 5760x1080 gaming)

 

[Cortana]

So my 2x asus gtx 680 in sli (just slightly oc'ed) is better then a highly oc'ed gtx 970 might even be as good as a stock gtx 980, what is the score for a gtx 980? (but still not high end for 5760x1080 gaming)

However, my card cost me nearly half what your setup costs.

The lowest GTX 980 score was 1645, though that was an overclocked run. since mine is so close, I can only assume that my single overclocked 970 performs better than a stock 980 saved me 200 bucks for the same performance. (though of course if I had a 980 I'd OC the crap out of that too..) well good luck with your 600 dollar setup.

 

[gasolin]

Didin't pay full price for my 2x gtx 680, bought them used, 2x gtx 680 would cost less then 400€ used (traded in my old gpu) and a new one i guess 2 years ago would have cost 600€ when they where new

 

[Cortana]

However, I still paid less, and have room to expand. And mine is new, if that matters at all.. AAAANNNNDDDD you originally had to pay for the GPU you traded, so that value needs to be added on top of whatever you ended up paying for the 680s.
Either way, good job I guess. what was your score then? I'm too lazy to check

 

[gasolin]

My score in full screen ram about 400mhz + and gpu about 60mhz + (2x asus gtx 680 dcu2 4gb)

Fps 67.9
Score 1712
Min fps 27.9
Max score 164.2

Mabye a bit more now since gpu is a bit higher about 100mhz+

 

[Cortana]

Actually OP, I think I'd rather post this bench. Got this one today, and it brings me above an overclocked 980.. so heck yeah. only tweaked a few things, Ill show you.

Intel i7 4790K @ 4.7 GHz - MSI GTX 970 Gaming Edition @ 1561 Core / 2049 Memory - Corsair Vengeance Pro 16GB 2400Mhz - Score 1647

 

[Cortana]

My score in full screen ram about 400mhz + and gpu about 60mhz + (2x asus gtx 680 dcu2 4gb)

Fps 67.9
Score 1712
Min fps 27.9
Max score 164.2

Mabye a bit more now since gpu is a bit higher about 100mhz+

Cool, 2.5 frames over me and 65 points. I still don't think its worth it, but anyway, good job.

 

[gasolin]

Its not oc'ed at all to its limited 2x gtx 680 limited is around 1200-1300 mhz on the core

 

[Cortana]

Its not oc'ed at all to its limited 2x gtx 680 limited is around 1200-1300 mhz on the core

Then go for it.

 

[icubuthed]

4790k @ 4.7 GTX 980 SC 1391/2055

 

[Cortana]

View attachment 63291 4790k @ 4.7 GTX 980 SC 1391/2055

Nice score, but what's up with the wireframe?