UNIGINE-Valley BENCHMARK scores

[uuuaaaaaa]

I think i can push a much better score than that. I will post a update on the scores when my new memory sticks arrive ))

 

[Mydog]

It's really weird you're higher than GamerGuy running 8x. I know he ran a very slightly higher res but on nvidia you lose 1000 points going to 8x. Maybe nvidia needs to optimize better for valley??

My only trick is to disable tessalation in CCC.

 

[LAN_deRf_HA]

My only trick is to disable tessalation in CCC.

Well that would certainly explain it. The test is pretty much all about tesselation.

 

[d1nky]

i thought someone was going to mention CCC. yea the results can be improved by several changes tess changes, to me it kind of spoils the purpose this thread!

 

[Mydog]

Just did a test on my 24/7 settings, CPU @4,7 GHz GPU's 1150/1500

With Tesselation

Without Tesselation

Disabling tesselation in CCC doesn't seem to help at all.


Max OC without tesselation and only 4xAA, CPU @5,0 GHz and GPU's @1280/1700

 

[LAN_deRf_HA]

Well that's even weirder, and we're back to blaming cpu influence.

 

[Tatty_Two]

Don't really bench anymore so just ran this at my 24/7 settings, no GPU graphic tweaks.......I7 930 @ 4.2gig, HD7870 @ 1220/1375.

 

[GamerGuy]

Makes sense, mydog's score of >5k is with CPU @5ghz and GPU @1280/1700, mine's limited to CPU @4.5ghz (w/o messing with vcore voltage) and GPU @1080/1425 (due to my cards being so close together). The 3rd card does nothing, so yeah, it does make sense. I think Heaven V4.0 and Metro 2033 are more GPU intensive, with less emphasis on CPU....

 

[Spider-Vice]

Q6600 @ 3.0 Ghz (It says 2.4 there still lol) // HD6870 @ Stock

The min FPS was due to a god damned single microstutter in the middle of the benchmark, still better than I expected.
*walks away with shame with his horrible result compared to the rest*

 

[Red_or_Dead]

you need to change my result to 2X 7950, not 7970

 

[freakshow]

wow i just ran this and i gotta say is....damn i thought my pc is still going strong then i look at other peoples scores compared to mine....such a damn shame

 

[MetalRacer]

CPU 5.0
GPU 1190/6908

I'll give two Titans a try latter.

 

[Mydog]

Great score for a single GPU

 

[D007]

Score: 4384
Unigine, GPU-Z and EVGA precision up, in thumb.

1118/1842
i7 960 bloomfield @ 4 ghz

Me likey 2x GTX 680... Me likey very much.


Whats up with the top score though? @8x AA?
How about we all just stick to the rules n keep it simple?
5k is nice lol..
That liquid cooling is getting you some sweet clocks.
Nice Mobo too. ^^

GPU vs GPU directly though, I'm seeing 2x 660/680, barely beating the 2x 7970's..
:x
Scary how close 2x 660ti are, to 2x 680..

 

[LAN_deRf_HA]

Scary how close 2x 660ti are, to 2x 680..

Well apparently you'd pull ahead more with a newer cpu and higher clock... I guess. This benchmark seems kinda iffy, but I'm too lazy to make and manage a Heaven 4.0 thread.

 

[Fluffmeister]

CPU 5.0
GPU 1190/6908

Image *snip*

I'll give two Titans a try latter.

Very impressive, Titan is a monster

Can't wait to see what two can do.

 

[LAN_deRf_HA]

CPU influence confirmed. @4.9 GHz 1267/7450

 

[Mydog]

Score: 4384
Unigine, GPU-Z and EVGA precision up, in thumb.

1118/1842
i7 960 bloomfield @ 4 ghz

Me likey 2x GTX 680... Me likey very much.


Whats up with the top score though? @8x AA?
How about we all just stick to the rules n keep it simple?
5k is nice lol..
That liquid cooling is getting you some sweet clocks.
Nice Mobo too. ^^

GPU vs GPU directly though, I'm seeing 2x 660/680, barely beating the 2x 7970's..
:x
Scary how close 2x 660ti are, to 2x 680..

Nice score but as others say you need a better CPU with higher speed.

As for the 8xAA score it was a mistake I made, just picked the wrong saved score when I made the screen. I've posted three others with 4xAA that are better.

@LAN_deRf_HA

I never doubted CPU speed would have an impact, so far I've not seen any benchmark where it hasn't more or less.

 

[toilet pepper]

Tried it again. Overclocking Mem by a 100Hz does not get any benefits.

New clocks. Sapphire 7950 1170/1470

 

[LAN_deRf_HA]

I never doubted CPU speed would have an impact, so far I've not seen any benchmark where it hasn't more or less.

I seem to recall people reporting it making zero difference in Heaven.

 

[Mydog]

I seem to recall people reporting it making zero difference in Heaven.

Me to so I tested it and they where wrong, in Heaven it doesn't make much of a difference as one would like but it does make a difference. Just go and look at the top scores at HWboot.

 

[LAN_deRf_HA]

Me to so I tested it and they where wrong, in Heaven it doesn't make much of a difference as one would like but it does make a difference. Just go and look at the top scores at HWboot.

In response to this I just retested. I score 1 point higher at 4 ghz than I do at 4.4 ghz in Heaven. This matches tests done here at tpu long ago. If the cpu ever has an effect in Heaven it is only when it's a bottleneck which is a very rare occurrence. This consistency is what makes it the go to gpu test.

 

[Mydog]

In response to this I just retested. I score 1 point higher at 4 ghz than I do at 4.4 ghz in Heaven. This matches tests done here at tpu long ago. If the cpu ever has an effect in Heaven it is only when it's a bottleneck which is a very rare occurrence. This consistency is what makes it the go to gpu test.

Agreed

 

[Wrigleyvillain]

Ok here's 1080P. I also did not have texture filter on performance on my first 1440P run, btw.

3570K: 4.3
7950: 1200/1350

 

[Mydog]

Ok here's 1080P. I also did not have texture filter on performance on my first 1440P run, btw.

CPU: 4.3
7950: 1200/1350

Where's the 4xAA?