• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

UNIGINE-Valley BENCHMARK scores

Status
Not open for further replies.
strange score tho...
00004.jpg Clipboard01.jpg

also the boost on GPU-Z show 1479 but on monitoring it was a constant 1643
 
I apologise once again for being late on updating the scores... if im up to installing my new card on Monday i'll go through and add all the latest scores...if not that day then the minute im feeling strong enough...some great scores btw...
 
The boost thing is so weird with NVIDIA. Also, MSI Afterburner doesn't even seem to detect those clock changes or something. Also what's up with reading GDDR5 memory in double data rate instead of quad data rate? It's so idiotic compared to Radeons. 7000MHz memory for NVIDIA is 3500MHz GDDR5. By what logic, I don't know... This isn't DDR1 or DDR2 memory...

And I absolutely hate overclocking with offset. You add something and you have no clue how much you have. Not for clocks and not for voltages. Really dumb design decision compared to Radeons where you always know how much you actually are getting out of the card...
 
RejZoR said:
The boost thing is so weird with NVIDIA. Also, MSI Afterburner doesn't even seem to detect those clock changes or something. Also what's up with reading GDDR5 memory in double data rate instead of quad data rate? It's so idiotic compared to Radeons. 7000MHz memory for NVIDIA is 3500MHz GDDR5. By what logic, I don't know... This isn't DDR1 or DDR2 memory...

And I absolutely hate overclocking with offset. You add something and you have no clue how much you have. Not for clocks and not for voltages. Really dumb design decision compared to Radeons where you always know how much you actually are getting out of the card...
Click to expand...

Now you know why I disabled boost in bios, found a fixed clock, and stuck with it... ;)
 
purecain said:
I apologise once again for being late on updating the scores... if im up to installing my new card on Monday i'll go through and add all the latest scores...if not that day then the minute im feeling strong enough...some great scores btw...
Click to expand...
no worries take your time :) being patient is also a virtue for enthusiast and benchmarker alike
 
Ive managed to install my card and run it once on unigine at stock settings. I changed one thing in control panel which was texture settings to quality instead of performance. reall happy with it... cant even get ,y head around having to uninstall the watercooling on the 290x... infact watercooled 290x for sale...lol
anyway heres the score.. :) i'll update them tomorrow. and i'll overclock my card aswell... :toast:
titanXunigine.png
 
螢幕截圖 2015-07-07 02.57.37.jpg

SAPPHIRE TOXIC R9 270X 2GB GDDR5 WITH BOOST 2GB GDDR5 (1300 MHz Core , 1550MHz Mem @ 1.3V VDDC)
Intel Core i5 4570 3.2GHz Non-Overclock
1871 Score
 
ive updated the scores up to the last two pages... ran out of steam yesterday. i'll have another look tomorrow and get it up to date.

can I just say, the comparisons are really getting interesting now... I added one score with 4 GTX 970's in sli. I think the score was over 5000 which is as good as a single titan x. amazing .... :toast:
 
GTX 980Ti AMP EXtreme edition clocks 1253/1355
heaven2015-07-0818-48-25-67.jpg
[/IMG]
heaven2015-07-0818-48-25-67.jpg
 
purecain said:
ive updated the scores up to the last two pages... ran out of steam yesterday. i'll have another look tomorrow and get it up to date.

can I just say, the comparisons are really getting interesting now... I added one score with 4 GTX 970's in sli. I think the score was over 5000 which is as good as a single titan x. amazing .... :toast:
Click to expand...
:D i can wait for mine to be updated ;) no worries

GreiverBlade said:
strange score tho...
View attachment 66234 View attachment 66235

also the boost on GPU-Z show 1479 but on monitoring it was a constant 1643
Click to expand...
that one ;)
 
I just decided to have alittle benching session with my card and managed 1532mhz gpu / 7210mhz mem

I decided to see if I could hit 5000 points and its turned out to be np for my silicon...

I havnt even touched the memory much yet.

titanx5000.png

titan5053.png


and again at 7470MHz on the memory.
if my card does more than the average +200mhz gpu I should end up with a beefy score. im +140mhz right now...

really happy with a 5000point card atm though.....:toast:

and again @1592mhz gpu/7470mhz mem
titan5176.png
 
Last edited:
@purecain, are you using water and/or any modded BIOS? I'm tempted by a Titan X as the custom 980ti's won't have blocks for a while.
 
@the54thvoid - im on air for now...stock Zotac bios and as far as upgrading. I'd say go with the titan x. how do you know that some of the disabled shaders on the 980Ti were just full Maxwell titan chips that didn't make the grade???just a thought...
heres my last run @1592/7810mhz and I havnt hit a wall yet... :toast:
titan5239.png
 
Last edited:
purecain said:
@the54thvoid - im on air for now...stock Zotac bios and as far as upgrading. I'd say go with the titan x. how do you know that some of the disabled shaders on the 980Ti were just full Maxwell titan chips that didn't make the grade???just a thought...
heres my last run @1592/7810mhz and I havnt hit a wall yet... :toast:
View attachment 66346
Click to expand...
what is the brand and asic % of yours?
 
and again @1612mhz gpu/3955mhz mem
titan5315.png
asic is 65.3% on air. the brand is Zotac.

if I can manage another 50-100mhz on the gpu, I think I can beat my old 290x crossfire score.
 
Last edited:
purecain said:
and again @1612mhz gpu/3955mhz mem
View attachment 66355 asic is 65.3% on air. the brand is Zotac.

if I can manage another 50-100mhz on the gpu, I think I can beat my old 290x crossfire score.
Click to expand...
the hardware must be taking your charisma into account otherwise i dont know how you can achieve such high clock.. makes me wanna buy one too :/
 
im just reading this guys story about 4 titan x gpu's he bought.

one of the cards wouldn't oc, so he tested its asic. it came out with an asic of 80.0 while all the others came out at 65.5 or something similar. the cards with the lower asic 'in this case' clocked far higher.
that doesn't mean to say there arnt other factors at work, like his high asic quality card having a power issue or something similarly obscure.
my card hasn't reached any memory oc or gpu oc walls yet so im hoping I have a golden sample... we shall soon see... i'll bench again later, after the days started to cool down... i'll update the scores then. hopefully when I add mine its gonna be a high score... :toast:

:lovetpu:
 
jboydgolfer said:
It's just a 7870, but it OC's like a beast....after it ran the Final Fantasy Heaven sword BM easily I thought I'd do this one too. Memory @ 1450Mhz Core @ 1050Mhz

It seems that Many of these scores posted are Without Tesselation....or the Tesselation isn't shown on they're results(which makes me feel like if it's not Shown it's likely Not on)not accusing, just seems prudent to show settings for transparency. ... For Example--i noticed that a HD6870 got a 1259, and it seems a bit unlikely with Extreme tesselation on, unless My card is terrible, and the 6870 I had was too :) , even my 6950 which is Still a beast crawled when Tesselation was set to Extreme.just seems like a reach for a Cayman chip to Me.Im not sure if that just wasn't shown in older heavens though....

Capture.png
Click to expand...
Wrong thread, you need the other one.

Edit: I ran Valley but for some reason I couldn't save a screen shot, what am I doing wrong?
 
Last edited:
Caring1 said:
Wrong thread, you need the other one.

Edit: I ran Valley but for some reason I couldn't save a screen shot, what am I doing wrong?
Click to expand...
harddrive was full? :)
 
haswrong said:
harddrive was full? :)
Click to expand...
I've got 16.7GB free, and the two times I have tried to save a screen shot through Paint, it comes out totally black.
Is there another way to save the test results?
Edit again, doesn't matter, I found them by doing a search, I will post them.
 
Last edited:
00000.png

R9 270X @ stock clocks. 975/1400. CPU STOCK 3.4ghZ.
 
Last edited:
its saved to your profile name folder... so mine is start - c/purecain/in here beneath all your picture/appdata/desktop/ folders... so just scroll to the bottom and they are there.

I have no idea why print screen stopped working. it sent me around the bend trying to figure out what I had changed as it worked beforehand.

anyway you found the results I the end... :toast:
 
the54thvoid said:
Unigine is the developer - the most popular two they do are Heaven and Valley.

As the title clearly states, this the

Untitled.png
Click to expand...

ah...simple mistake...easily made. ill delete mine.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top