Not sure how this whole conversation turned sideways from what the title says to politics and such. Not going to give warnings and I will automatically issue thread bans because most of the culprits are repeat offenders.
I've posted some "not on subject" posts.
I apologize.
I jumped too quick on the impact it could have had for me, not staying impartial leading to people getting on edge.
As I understand it, it went sideways because people read the article (for once), and not only the title, leading to see that's a politic decision which was based on Intel (probably) recommendations ; as I understand it, since Intel have it's own fabs and is US based.
So what everybody thought was : "hey, they try to cut out China or whatever, and bring some jobs on US soil".
Some answer were : "it won't resolve anything about US employment nor economy actual problems". We had to expose that other countries are not fearing that kind of threat, because it's not something for the economy, it's about strategy.
But, and that's the whole point, this decision leads to higher prices on silicon (in theory), which was the point of comparison between different people, and what turned bad.
If at this point, I'm getting it wrong, I'd be grateful to read what I should have understand from the article. For my own sake.
And If you want to share, I think I'm not the only one interested. Sincerely.
