1)
@lexluthermiester, are you incapable of scrolling up to see your own words? I think it's ironic that I use the same, but am somehow wrong. Let me see. "You missed the point being made by Auswolf, one I agree with fully." No, disagreeing and missing the point are two entirely different things.
Except I didn't misunderstand. Evidence you say? One moment...
2) Doing a thing is not something that should be rewarded. It is also not to be interpreted as good, when the good is literally the opposite of what was cited. Read. Valve finished the statement about removing all of these games not by saying it was a stand on quality...and that they would be allowed back immediately if they changed their monetization. I use a body as a metaphor, because you seem to not want to see that they didn't do anything inherently good.
...this silly nonsense. Honestly, how stupid do you think we are to accept your double-talk here?
(more senseless nonsense trying to justify forced ads in games)
Just stop. No one cares about any of that.
Simply put, Valve just made a move that will have the following effects;
A. Make things better for gamers who want to GAME instead of watching brainless ads.
B. Force trash devs to make some effort and produce a title worthy of charging money for.
C. Clean up all the garbage currently cluttering up the Steam Store.
D. Prevent more garbage from cluttering up the store in future.
E. Somewhat ensure that customer/gamer experiences are more positive going forward.
This is not a human body, there's no need for such daft comparison.
Daft is a good description.
