- Joined
- Aug 9, 2019
- Messages
- 1,736 (0.87/day)
Processor | 7800X3D 2x16GB CO |
---|---|
Motherboard | Asrock B650m HDV |
Cooling | Peerless Assassin SE |
Memory | 2x16GB DR A-die@6000c30 tuned |
Video Card(s) | Asus 4070 dual OC 2610@915mv |
Storage | WD blue 1TB nvme |
Display(s) | Lenovo G24-10 144Hz |
Case | Corsair D4000 Airflow |
Power Supply | EVGA GQ 650W |
Software | Windows 10 home 64 |
Benchmark Scores | Superposition 8k 5267 Aida64 58.5ns |
RC and RFC are 'hard' timings. The value between no boot and 100% stable is very small. Example:Ill check AIDA later , i tested CB single and im getting better results while the multi are the same.
Yes ill stick to 1867 , my RAM couldnt do stable CL14 at 1900 anyway (have to do CL15 with some timings increased) and i prefer a stable system for when im working on this system, im only trying to push its limits for fun but ofc if i find something stable i wont throw away the extra performance
On my rev E
RC 54 no boot
RC 55 100% stable, no crashes, but many errors in TM5
RC 56 no errors
RFC 518 no boot
RFC 520 unstable
RFC 522 100% stable
RC and RFC are very important for performance, find lowest stable value for a nice boost. You probably have little gains left on RFC, but RC may do several numbers lower