• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Why everyone say Zen 5 is bad ?

Joined
May 10, 2023
Messages
228 (0.42/day)
Location
Brazil
Processor 5950x
Motherboard B550 ProArt
Cooling Fuma 2
Memory 4x32GB 3200MHz Corsair LPX
Video Card(s) 2x RTX 3090
Display(s) LG 42" C2 4k OLED
Power Supply XPG Core Reactor 850W
Software I use Arch btw
That's putting a lot of hope in a rumor. With Intel cutting cost in a lot of places, I'd be surprised to see them keeping this. This isn't the obvious time for them to have (almost) two new CPU types at the same time.. or do they want LGA1700 to become their AM4?

What would we do without hope.
Isn't it also supposed to be an edge/networking solution at first? I believe that, even if it were to came to the desktop, it'd take a while for it to be available through the regular sales channels.
 

SL2

Joined
Jan 27, 2006
Messages
2,417 (0.35/day)
Isn't it also supposed to be an edge/networking solution at first? I believe that, even if it were to came to the desktop, it'd take a while for it to be available through the regular sales channels.
I've heard that as well, which begs the question if it would run anywhere close to 14900K speeds.

Without the speed there's no point drooling at the core count. It's the same situation as when looking at server parts.
 
Joined
Sep 3, 2019
Messages
3,477 (1.84/day)
Location
Thessaloniki, Greece
System Name PC on since Aug 2019, 1st CPU R5 3600 + ASUS ROG RX580 8GB >> MSI Gaming X RX5700XT (Jan 2020)
Processor Ryzen 9 5900X (July 2022), 220W PPT limit, 80C temp limit, CO -6-14, +50MHz (up to 5.0GHz)
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Pro (Rev1.0), BIOS F39b, AGESA V2 1.2.0.C
Cooling Arctic Liquid Freezer II 420mm Rev7 (Jan 2024) with off-center mount for Ryzen, TIM: Kryonaut
Memory 2x16GB G.Skill Trident Z Neo GTZN (July 2022) 3667MT/s 1.42V CL16-16-16-16-32-48 1T, tRFC:280, B-die
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ RX 7900XTX (Dec 2023) 314~467W (375W current) PowerLimit, 1060mV, Adrenalin v24.10.1
Storage Samsung NVMe: 980Pro 1TB(OS 2022), 970Pro 512GB(2019) / SATA-III: 850Pro 1TB(2015) 860Evo 1TB(2020)
Display(s) Dell Alienware AW3423DW 34" QD-OLED curved (1800R), 3440x1440 144Hz (max 175Hz) HDR400/1000, VRR on
Case None... naked on desk
Audio Device(s) Astro A50 headset
Power Supply Corsair HX750i, ATX v2.4, 80+ Platinum, 93% (250~700W), modular, single/dual rail (switch)
Mouse Logitech MX Master (Gen1)
Keyboard Logitech G15 (Gen2) w/ LCDSirReal applet
Software Windows 11 Home 64bit (v24H2, OSBuild 26100.2161), upgraded from Win10 to Win11 on Jan 2024
Heard some rumors that Bartlett Lake could suffer from the same issues like Raptor so maybe its meant only for low-er speeds...
But nothing is confirmed of course. Could be just bad mouthing, but I would keep my hopes low.
 

SL2

Joined
Jan 27, 2006
Messages
2,417 (0.35/day)
Heard some rumors that Bartlett Lake could suffer from the same issues like Raptor so maybe its meant only for low-er speeds...
But nothing is confirmed of course. Could be just bad mouthing, but I would keep my hopes low.
Yeah you never know, but unless a CPU is built with high clock speeds in mind, what are the chances it would end up as fast as people wants it to be?

Is it close to being a Raptor with swapped cores, or are there other changes like number of PCIE lanes? (doubt it)

What about RAM speed? Is the multiplier unlocked?

Now that I think of it, the chance of it having an unlocked multiplier alone seems unlikely.
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Messages
12,334 (5.80/day)
Location
Midlands, UK
System Name Nebulon B
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard MSi PRO B650M-A WiFi
Cooling be quiet! Dark Rock 4
Memory 2x 24 GB Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT 12 GB
Storage 2 TB Corsair MP600 GS, 2 TB Corsair MP600 R2
Display(s) Dell S3422DWG, 7" Waveshare touchscreen
Case Kolink Citadel Mesh black
Audio Device(s) Logitech Z333 2.1 speakers, AKG Y50 headphones
Power Supply Seasonic Prime GX-750
Mouse Logitech MX Master 2S
Keyboard Logitech G413 SE
Software Bazzite (Fedora Linux) KDE
You must self censor as a beginning, then we will talk, if you are still here..
I call bullshit on that, too. Let's not get personal, shall we? ;)
 
Joined
Jul 11, 2022
Messages
356 (0.42/day)
It really did.

and they killed HEDT which sent all of us core whores down to consumer.

Yeah and AMD never had an HEDT with more than 8 cores on a single CCX within a single CCD. Even Threadripper Zen 3 and newer still 8 cores per CCX/CCD.

AMD HEDT is great if you want more than 16 cores and lots of them in separate NUMA domains.

Intel on other hand had HEDT with more than 8 cores a while back last being Cascade Lake X which had decent IPC. It was on a mesh, but all cores were on same mesh and overclocking the mesh yielded much better performance despite latency crippled compared to ring bus and sometimes the overclocking of mesh negated that latency penalty if I remember right?

Now Intel has no HEDT. They have Xeon Workstation Sapphire Rapids which is more expensive and its IPC is crippled unlike Skylake X and Cascade Lake X requires ECC RAM which is less overclock friendly and stupid glamorous enterprise grade motherboards detrimental to things like gaming. Though but they do have more than 8 strong cores on one die the mesh, but their IPC and latency is once again severely gimped compared to Alder Lake client Golden Cove.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 20, 2007
Messages
21,411 (3.40/day)
System Name Pioneer
Processor Ryzen R9 9950X
Motherboard GIGABYTE Aorus Elite X670 AX
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 + A whole lotta Sunon and Corsair Maglev blower fans...
Memory 64GB (4x 16GB) G.Skill Flare X5 @ DDR5-6000 CL30
Video Card(s) XFX RX 7900 XTX Speedster Merc 310
Storage Intel 905p Optane 960GB boot, +2x Crucial P5 Plus 2TB PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSDs
Display(s) 55" LG 55" B9 OLED 4K Display
Case Thermaltake Core X31
Audio Device(s) TOSLINK->Schiit Modi MB->Asgard 2 DAC Amp->AKG Pro K712 Headphones or HDMI->B9 OLED
Power Supply FSP Hydro Ti Pro 850W
Mouse Logitech G305 Lightspeed Wireless
Keyboard WASD Code v3 with Cherry Green keyswitches + PBT DS keycaps
Software Gentoo Linux x64 / Windows 11 Enterprise IoT 2024
That's wrong. Six cores only would not be enough for the game and Windows and all of its main and background processes to run without micro-stuttering, and drops of the 0.1% lows.
I love the evidence ARF brings to the table...

EDIT: in case it isn't clear, the post I quoted is lacking it.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 11, 2022
Messages
356 (0.42/day)
Isn't it also supposed to be an edge/networking solution at first? I believe that, even if it were to came to the desktop, it'd take a while for it to be available through the regular sales channels.

Looks like a consumer release? Though hard to say,

Though if its networking and edge, how much does it cost Intel to make a 12 + 0 die on a ring. Or would they just shave 12 working P cores off Sapphire Rapids or Emerald Rapids defective dies and stuff them in it?? If its the later a hard pass, If its the former I am probably a buyer.

Why would Intel go through hassle of making a new 12P core die on a ring bus for only networking and edge when ring bus is really for performance desktops?

Yeah you never know, but unless a CPU is built with high clock speeds in mind, what are the chances it would end up as fast as people wants it to be?

Is it close to being a Raptor with swapped cores, or are there other changes like number of PCIE lanes? (doubt it)

What about RAM speed? Is the multiplier unlocked?

Now that I think of it, the chance of it having an unlocked multiplier alone seems unlikely.

If it had just 4 more PCIe Gen 4 lanes awesome. Then could have 2 NVME off CPU without cutting into 16 Gen 5 video card lanes. I like 2 NVME SSDs. One for OS and one for games.

Lisa basically admitted in an interview a little while ago that AMD is sandbagging on core counts

Well how about more than 8 cores on a single CCX that isn't C cores Lisa Su.

Per rumored even Zen 6 is still 8 regular cores and 16C cores and 32 denser cores on CCXs. That sucks.

So is she really saying they could put more than 8 on a CCX that are big cores and not the C cores??

Or just that maybe they would consider adding more to consumer chips as in 8 core CCX/CCDs, but maybe increase it to 3 instead of 2. No thanks. Threadripper already does that a whole bunch of 8 core CCDs.

AMD seems technically limited in their design unlike Intel and maybe struggles to get more than 8 on one die. Intel has more options and much bigger company. They just have not executed them lately or provided good ones to consumers or gimped IPC and latency and ECC required expensive SPR Xeon Workstation.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 10, 2018
Messages
6,866 (3.05/day)
Location
California
System Name His & Hers
Processor R7 5800X/ R7 7950X3D Stock
Motherboard X670E Aorus Pro X/ROG Crosshair VIII Hero
Cooling Corsair h150 elite/ Corsair h115i Platinum
Memory Trident Z5 Neo 6000/ 32 GB 3200 CL14 @3800 CL16 Team T Force Nighthawk
Video Card(s) Evga FTW 3 Ultra 3080ti/ Gigabyte Gaming OC 4090
Storage lots of SSD.
Display(s) A whole bunch OLED, VA, IPS.....
Case 011 Dynamic XL/ Phanteks Evolv X
Audio Device(s) Arctis Pro + gaming Dac/ Corsair sp 2500/ Logitech G560/Samsung Q990B
Power Supply Seasonic Ultra Prime Titanium 1000w/850w
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed/ Logitech G Pro Hero.
Keyboard Logitech - G915 LIGHTSPEED / Logitech G Pro
AMD seems technically limited in their design unlike Intel and maybe struggles to get more than 8 on one die. Intel has more options and much bigger company. They just have not executed them lately or provided good ones to consumers or gimped IPC and latency and ECC required expensive SPR Xeon Workstation.

It's a cost thing and it's competitive enough with intel that they don't care to offer more. Seems the primary goal is to use 1 8 core CCD for the whole product stack which honestly has worked out pretty well for them.

They do make odd intel like chips for laptop though

GZs0wjGemQmrzSbe.jpg

They actually do seem to care more about server and laptop so it makes sense I guess.
 

SL2

Joined
Jan 27, 2006
Messages
2,417 (0.35/day)
So the ADMIN-Admin (or whatever you call it) is one thing, but using 24H2 for tests is not something I've seen mentioned before.

Videocardz said:
Moreover, AMD uses Admin mode for its automated testing on Windows 11 24H2. This mode enables new branch prediction code optimizations that were not present in the systems used by reviewers. These optimizations are only available in the latest version of Windows 11, which is currently accessible only through the Insider Program (Build 26100). In other words, gaming performance is expected to improve once the newer version is released.


I just wish they would have told us from the beginning!
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 10, 2018
Messages
6,866 (3.05/day)
Location
California
System Name His & Hers
Processor R7 5800X/ R7 7950X3D Stock
Motherboard X670E Aorus Pro X/ROG Crosshair VIII Hero
Cooling Corsair h150 elite/ Corsair h115i Platinum
Memory Trident Z5 Neo 6000/ 32 GB 3200 CL14 @3800 CL16 Team T Force Nighthawk
Video Card(s) Evga FTW 3 Ultra 3080ti/ Gigabyte Gaming OC 4090
Storage lots of SSD.
Display(s) A whole bunch OLED, VA, IPS.....
Case 011 Dynamic XL/ Phanteks Evolv X
Audio Device(s) Arctis Pro + gaming Dac/ Corsair sp 2500/ Logitech G560/Samsung Q990B
Power Supply Seasonic Ultra Prime Titanium 1000w/850w
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed/ Logitech G Pro Hero.
Keyboard Logitech - G915 LIGHTSPEED / Logitech G Pro
So the ADMIN-Admin (or whatever you call it) is one thing, but using 24H2 for tests is not something I've seen mentioned before.




I just wish they'd told us from the beginning!

At least now they are being honest and saying a 5-8% improvement in gaming in their cherry picked games using in game benchmarks ofc lmao......

Also that it's faster than Raptor lake if we artificially gimp the shite out of it lol....
 
Joined
Dec 16, 2017
Messages
2,890 (1.15/day)
Location
Buenos Aires, Argentina
System Name System V
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Motherboard Asus Prime X570-P
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper 212 // a bunch of 120 mm Xigmatek 1500 RPM fans (2 ins, 3 outs)
Memory 2x8GB Ballistix Sport LT 3200 MHz (BLS8G4D32AESCK.M8FE) (CL16-18-18-36)
Video Card(s) Gigabyte AORUS Radeon RX 580 8 GB
Storage SHFS37A240G / DT01ACA200 / ST10000VN0008 / ST8000VN004 / SA400S37960G / SNV21000G / NM620 2TB
Display(s) LG 22MP55 IPS Display
Case NZXT Source 210
Audio Device(s) Logitech G430 Headset
Power Supply Corsair CX650M
Software Whatever build of Windows 11 is being served in Canary channel at the time.
Benchmark Scores Corona 1.3: 3120620 r/s Cinebench R20: 3355 FireStrike: 12490 TimeSpy: 4624
using 24H2 for tests

I wonder who thought it was a great idea to use a Windows Insider build for testing.

That or the shiny new Enterprise LTSC
 

SL2

Joined
Jan 27, 2006
Messages
2,417 (0.35/day)
Also:

We're collaborating with Microsoft to roll out this optional update to all Windows 11 users soon.

Also that it's faster than Raptor lake if we artificially gimp the shite out of it lol....
Dunno if using "default settings" is AMD's fault. It's kind of in the name if you're asking me.

I wonder who thought it was a great idea to use a Windows Insider build for testing.
It's explained in the text. The problem is that AMD didn't have the update ready, or at least tell us.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 10, 2018
Messages
6,866 (3.05/day)
Location
California
System Name His & Hers
Processor R7 5800X/ R7 7950X3D Stock
Motherboard X670E Aorus Pro X/ROG Crosshair VIII Hero
Cooling Corsair h150 elite/ Corsair h115i Platinum
Memory Trident Z5 Neo 6000/ 32 GB 3200 CL14 @3800 CL16 Team T Force Nighthawk
Video Card(s) Evga FTW 3 Ultra 3080ti/ Gigabyte Gaming OC 4090
Storage lots of SSD.
Display(s) A whole bunch OLED, VA, IPS.....
Case 011 Dynamic XL/ Phanteks Evolv X
Audio Device(s) Arctis Pro + gaming Dac/ Corsair sp 2500/ Logitech G560/Samsung Q990B
Power Supply Seasonic Ultra Prime Titanium 1000w/850w
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed/ Logitech G Pro Hero.
Keyboard Logitech - G915 LIGHTSPEED / Logitech G Pro
Dunno if using "default settings" is AMD's fault. It's kind of in the name if you're asking me.

Must have been how Tomshardware tested as well they are the only place that has the 7800X3D 30% faster than Raptorlake lol
 
Joined
Sep 10, 2018
Messages
6,866 (3.05/day)
Location
California
System Name His & Hers
Processor R7 5800X/ R7 7950X3D Stock
Motherboard X670E Aorus Pro X/ROG Crosshair VIII Hero
Cooling Corsair h150 elite/ Corsair h115i Platinum
Memory Trident Z5 Neo 6000/ 32 GB 3200 CL14 @3800 CL16 Team T Force Nighthawk
Video Card(s) Evga FTW 3 Ultra 3080ti/ Gigabyte Gaming OC 4090
Storage lots of SSD.
Display(s) A whole bunch OLED, VA, IPS.....
Case 011 Dynamic XL/ Phanteks Evolv X
Audio Device(s) Arctis Pro + gaming Dac/ Corsair sp 2500/ Logitech G560/Samsung Q990B
Power Supply Seasonic Ultra Prime Titanium 1000w/850w
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed/ Logitech G Pro Hero.
Keyboard Logitech - G915 LIGHTSPEED / Logitech G Pro
AMD is only two weeks late tho. Damage is done, but at least it's not YEARS..

The problem is even when they were contacted by reviewers sayings what's up with these poor results they were dodgy about it.
 

SL2

Joined
Jan 27, 2006
Messages
2,417 (0.35/day)
Speaking of Toms, theres a driver coming soon as well, which is no surprise by now.

It's not mentioned in my links above tho (I think)

Toms said:
AMD’s blog doesn’t address a pressing issue with its chipset drivers, but I got clarification that the company will soon release a fix.

AMD's chipset driver uses a core parking technique to boost performance with some dual-CCD chips, like its new Ryzen 9 9950X and the top-tier Ryzen 7000X3D parts. However, this feature can’t be uninstalled from the operating system — once you’ve installed an AMD chip that uses the mechanism, you’re stuck with core parking for the life of your operating system. If you later install another processor with the same operating system, the feature will persist and can continue to park cores (potentially unbeknownst to the user), thus reducing performance with processors not designed to use the feature.

The only known good fix is to completely reinstall the operating system. This also creates problems for reviewers who test multiple processors on the same motherboard. While AMD didn’t touch on the topic in its blog, it’s conceivable that this issue contributed to the inconsistent results we’ve seen with the first wave of Ryzen 9000 reviews.

This issue has been known for some time, so I asked David McAfee, the Corporate VP and GM of AMD’s Client Channel Business, if there is a fix coming.

“[…] I will tell you it's in development. Our goal is to have that in your hands by the time we do our X3D reviews [Ryzen 9000X3D]. The timing didn't work out here, which was unfortunate, but I think this is a critical piece of ensuring consistent performance across a range of processor compares in the same socket,” McAfee responded.


The problem is even when they were contacted by reviewers sayings what's up with these poor results they were dodgy about it.
They were? I've only heard what PCWorld-Gordon has said, which was pretty much the opposite. That's my only source tho.

To me it looks like they made a big mistake, and it took some time to figure it out.
 
Joined
Sep 10, 2018
Messages
6,866 (3.05/day)
Location
California
System Name His & Hers
Processor R7 5800X/ R7 7950X3D Stock
Motherboard X670E Aorus Pro X/ROG Crosshair VIII Hero
Cooling Corsair h150 elite/ Corsair h115i Platinum
Memory Trident Z5 Neo 6000/ 32 GB 3200 CL14 @3800 CL16 Team T Force Nighthawk
Video Card(s) Evga FTW 3 Ultra 3080ti/ Gigabyte Gaming OC 4090
Storage lots of SSD.
Display(s) A whole bunch OLED, VA, IPS.....
Case 011 Dynamic XL/ Phanteks Evolv X
Audio Device(s) Arctis Pro + gaming Dac/ Corsair sp 2500/ Logitech G560/Samsung Q990B
Power Supply Seasonic Ultra Prime Titanium 1000w/850w
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed/ Logitech G Pro Hero.
Keyboard Logitech - G915 LIGHTSPEED / Logitech G Pro


They were? I've only heard what PCWorld-Gordon has said, which was pretty much the opposite. That's my only source tho.

To me it looks like they made a big mistake, and it took some time to figure it out.


Hub contacted them asking why performance was nowhere near what AMD claimed it was and intel basically told them your numbers aren't wrong but ours are higher. They then asked what settings were being used for the test systems etc and they wouldn't answer.
 

SL2

Joined
Jan 27, 2006
Messages
2,417 (0.35/day)
Hub contacted them asking why performance was nowhere near what AMD claimed it was and intel basically told them your numbers aren't wrong but ours are higher. They then asked what settings were being used for the test systems etc and they wouldn't answer.
Yeah, I remember now.

Must have been how Tomshardware tested as well they are the only place that has the 7800X3D 30% faster than Raptorlake lol
In games at 1080 I see a difference of 11% between 7800X3D and 14900K in the review of the latter, and 12% between the same in the 9950X review.

Sounds like too much, but I don't think "default settings" is to blame, maybe the reviewer..
 
Joined
May 22, 2024
Messages
408 (2.40/day)
System Name Kuro
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D@65W
Motherboard MSI MAG B650 Tomahawk WiFi
Cooling Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 EVO
Memory Corsair DDR5 6000C30 2x48GB (Hynix M)@6000 30-36-36-76 1.36V
Video Card(s) PNY XLR8 RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 16G@200W
Storage Crucial T500 2TB + WD Blue 8TB
Case Lian Li LANCOOL 216
Power Supply MSI MPG A850G
Software Ubuntu 24.04 LTS + Windows 10 Home Build 19045
Benchmark Scores 17761 C23 Multi@65W
Hub contacted them asking why performance was nowhere near what AMD claimed it was and intel basically told them your numbers aren't wrong but ours are higher. They then asked what settings were being used for the test systems etc and they wouldn't answer.
For what it worth, there is a theory floating around that between the launch delay and the apparent non-utility by a single thread of the second decoder new in Zen 5, that there was some sort of last-minute microcode patch that fixed some bug or exploit, but regressed performance after the official benchmark was released. It certainly sounded interesting.
 
Joined
Sep 10, 2018
Messages
6,866 (3.05/day)
Location
California
System Name His & Hers
Processor R7 5800X/ R7 7950X3D Stock
Motherboard X670E Aorus Pro X/ROG Crosshair VIII Hero
Cooling Corsair h150 elite/ Corsair h115i Platinum
Memory Trident Z5 Neo 6000/ 32 GB 3200 CL14 @3800 CL16 Team T Force Nighthawk
Video Card(s) Evga FTW 3 Ultra 3080ti/ Gigabyte Gaming OC 4090
Storage lots of SSD.
Display(s) A whole bunch OLED, VA, IPS.....
Case 011 Dynamic XL/ Phanteks Evolv X
Audio Device(s) Arctis Pro + gaming Dac/ Corsair sp 2500/ Logitech G560/Samsung Q990B
Power Supply Seasonic Ultra Prime Titanium 1000w/850w
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed/ Logitech G Pro Hero.
Keyboard Logitech - G915 LIGHTSPEED / Logitech G Pro
Yeah, I remember now.


In games at 1080 I see a difference of 11% between 7800X3D and 14900K in the review of the latter, and 12% between the same in the 9950X review.

Sounds like too much, but I don't think "default settings" is to blame, maybe the reviewer..

In their original 9700X review they had the 7800X3D 30% ahead of the 14700k when typically it's around 10%... Even when hub used the 125w bios on the 14900k it was only 8% slower than the 7800X3D.

Obviously a reviewer can skew results however they want but in you just look at multiple reviews that don't artificially gimp intel that is about ballpark.
 

SL2

Joined
Jan 27, 2006
Messages
2,417 (0.35/day)
In their original 9700X review they had the 7800X3D 30% ahead of the 14700k when typically it's around 10%...
They must have changed it, it's 17% now, and 14% in the 14700K review. I don't believe any of those numbers anyway, they're too high compared to others.
 
Joined
Sep 10, 2018
Messages
6,866 (3.05/day)
Location
California
System Name His & Hers
Processor R7 5800X/ R7 7950X3D Stock
Motherboard X670E Aorus Pro X/ROG Crosshair VIII Hero
Cooling Corsair h150 elite/ Corsair h115i Platinum
Memory Trident Z5 Neo 6000/ 32 GB 3200 CL14 @3800 CL16 Team T Force Nighthawk
Video Card(s) Evga FTW 3 Ultra 3080ti/ Gigabyte Gaming OC 4090
Storage lots of SSD.
Display(s) A whole bunch OLED, VA, IPS.....
Case 011 Dynamic XL/ Phanteks Evolv X
Audio Device(s) Arctis Pro + gaming Dac/ Corsair sp 2500/ Logitech G560/Samsung Q990B
Power Supply Seasonic Ultra Prime Titanium 1000w/850w
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed/ Logitech G Pro Hero.
Keyboard Logitech - G915 LIGHTSPEED / Logitech G Pro
Last edited:

SL2

Joined
Jan 27, 2006
Messages
2,417 (0.35/day)
I haven't fallowed toms in ages they use to be my go to back in like 2008/09....

About the time I was like nah this site sucks now.....
I never really liked them that much to begin with, I lost interest around 2004. AT, Xbitlabs and SPCR had lot more details in reviews, even if not having much in common.
 
Top