- Joined
- Aug 20, 2007
- Messages
- 21,542 (3.40/day)
System Name | Pioneer |
---|---|
Processor | Ryzen R9 9950X |
Motherboard | GIGABYTE Aorus Elite X670 AX |
Cooling | Noctua NH-D15 + A whole lotta Sunon and Corsair Maglev blower fans... |
Memory | 64GB (4x 16GB) G.Skill Flare X5 @ DDR5-6000 CL30 |
Video Card(s) | XFX RX 7900 XTX Speedster Merc 310 |
Storage | Intel 905p Optane 960GB boot, +2x Crucial P5 Plus 2TB PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSDs |
Display(s) | 55" LG 55" B9 OLED 4K Display |
Case | Thermaltake Core X31 |
Audio Device(s) | TOSLINK->Schiit Modi MB->Asgard 2 DAC Amp->AKG Pro K712 Headphones or HDMI->B9 OLED |
Power Supply | FSP Hydro Ti Pro 850W |
Mouse | Logitech G305 Lightspeed Wireless |
Keyboard | WASD Code v3 with Cherry Green keyswitches + PBT DS keycaps |
Software | Gentoo Linux x64 / Windows 11 Enterprise IoT 2024 |
That has already been long debunked. Intel soldered smaller CPU dies in the past without issue (see every sandy bridge i3 for instance at 149mm2).
Ryzen is smaller then a sandy bridge quad core (195mm2 vs 216mm2) yet AMD had no issue soldering them. Intel simply cheaped out because they could.
He's not saying they can't, it has a higher failure rate to solder small dies. Which is true. Again, it comes down to money, but at least for Intel a lost chip here and there is a slightly more legit expense than a simple cost of materials for solder.