- Joined
- Aug 16, 2004
- Messages
- 3,285 (0.44/day)
- Location
- Sunny California
Processor | AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D |
---|---|
Motherboard | Gigabyte Aorus X870E Elite |
Cooling | Asus Ryujin II 360 EVA Edition |
Memory | 4x16GBs DDR5 6000MHz Corsair Vengeance |
Video Card(s) | Zotac RTX 4090 AMP Extreme Airo |
Storage | 2TB Samsung 990 Pro OS - 4TB Nextorage G Series Games - 8TBs WD Black Storage |
Display(s) | LG C2 OLED 42" 4K 120Hz HDR G-Sync enabled TV |
Case | Asus ROG Helios EVA Edition |
Audio Device(s) | Denon AVR-S910W - 7.1 Klipsch Dolby ATMOS Speaker Setup - Audeze Maxwell |
Power Supply | beQuiet Straight Power 12 1500W |
Mouse | Asus ROG Keris EVA Edition - Asus ROG Scabbard II EVA Edition |
Keyboard | Asus ROG Strix Scope EVA Edition |
VR HMD | Samsung Odyssey VR |
Software | Windows 11 Pro 64bit |
:/ I don't know haha. I'd imagine it would be pretty pricey tbh.
I can imagine, I might end up selling a 580 locally
Having another card at all beyond a series 400 card is a waste as the card itself is powerful enough to handle both and wont bog anything down.
Thanks for the input, I know this is probably not the right thread to discuss this, and there really aren't that many games that take advantage of PhysX, but for the ones that do, it certainly helps to have a dedicated card to take away the burden from your rendering cards, check this article for reference.
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/batman-arkham-asylum,2465-8.html
Anyways, I'm probably more concerned about the thermal implications of keeping a third card in my case than about performance gains from pure PhysX acceleration, when I went 3-way SLI with my current cards, the top card's temp went up by about 2 to 3 degrees.
Thank you for your opinion