BUTLER P-47 (ROTATED MOTHERBOARD, SCRATCH BUILD, ALL IN ONE)

Posted:
September 1st 2016
Updated:
Viewed:
4,624 times
Rating:
Good (5.3)
Voting Graph 8 votes total
Submit vote:
Please register on the forums & login to vote.
Key Features:
Intel CPU NVIDIA Graphics Scratch Build Water-cooled
System Specs:
  • ASRock Z170M Extreme4
  • Intel Skylake 6600K
  • Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 (8GB X 4)
  • Samsung 850 EVO 500GB
  • Aquacomputer Aqualis D5 100ml
  • Magicool 240 G2 Slim Radiator
  • Phobya UC-1 CPU Block
  • XSPC FLX Clear 7/16" ID 5/8" OD PVC tubing
  • Cooler Master Jetflo 120 (x 4)
  • Acer GN246HL Bbid 144Hz Monitor (24")
  • Corsair CX600M PSU (salvaged from previous build)
  • Logitech g500s mouse (salvaged from previous build)
  • AmazonBasics AC computer speakers (A150)
Performed Mods:
Scratch build from raw aluminum! Front panel bent using bending tool. Primed and painted. Gauges monitor voltage of intake and exhaust fans. GPU sag eliminated by vertical orientation and support.
1. Angled aluminum front gauge panel. 2. Analog intake and exhaust fan voltage gauges. 3. Classic toggle switches. 4. Water cooling of CPU. 5. 90º MOBO rotation for uber air flow (intake fans on bottom, exhaust on top--no heat traps). 6. One cord to rule them all. No more laundry basket of components. Line power in box, with front panel toggle switch cutoff. 7. Speakers and monitor integrated on the case. 8. Power supply at the top of case, with no heat dumped inside.
Add your own comment

6 Comments on BUTLER P-47 (ROTATED MOTHERBOARD, SCRATCH BUILD, ALL IN ONE)

#1
Caring1
I think it is a work in progress. The concept may seem smart but the practical side of it needs development.
It takes up too much desk space, and cable management is a bit sloppy.
With a few of the larger components relocated the case could be a lot thinner allowing more desk top space for your use.
Posted on Reply
#2
Ergosum
Caring1I think it is a work in progress. The concept may seem smart but the practical side of it needs development.
It takes up too much desk space, and cable management is a bit sloppy.
With a few of the larger components relocated the case could be a lot thinner allowing more desk top space for your use.
I agree, in large extent. On this build, I could physically wire the external components internally, including the power supply. Depth, however, was largely dictated by the framing method chosen and the heat/air flow requirements. In an new version, I would likely:

1. Use external angle framing, which would allow the PSU to be oriented "flat" and not conflict with the frame or create a large gap.
2. Watercool the GPU and use a PCI slot extender to allow it to lie parallel to the mobo.
3. The next build will be going for a different look, so the gauges will be digital and more compact.

Many PSU locations were tested out in the solid model, most either required a different frame structure or violated my airflow mandate. Is the PSU the larger component of which you speak? Which component(s) would you have moved?

I think the thing I like the best about the build is the vertical GPU (no card sag!) and the internal mobo IO routing. I know this would drive many people crazy, but I had fun with the concept of minimal flow resistance (this will be better when I switch out the soft tubing for hard).
Posted on Reply
#3
Caring1
Yes, the two major components of PSU and GPU are what I referred to.
I had a similar thought, that an extender be used to rotate the GPU flat adjacent to the Motherboard and with such a large base, the PSU be relocated down there, and possible a concealed cavity, with a removable top, in the base below the monitor for hiding cables which could be routed through a small opening to allow routing to components externally.
Posted on Reply
#4
Ergosum
Caring1Yes, the two major components of PSU and GPU are what I referred to.
I had a similar thought, that an extender be used to rotate the GPU flat adjacent to the Motherboard and with such a large base, the PSU be relocated down there, and possible a concealed cavity, with a removable top, in the base below the monitor for hiding cables which could be routed through a small opening to allow routing to components externally.
That is where I had the PSU initially. With the 1" framing, I kept having to make compromises on the PSU air intake and exhaust locations--in different configurations I had either space problems (had to increase the size of the front base), intake problems (either restrictions or unsightly) or heat exhaust issues. When I do version 2, I'll probably keep the PSU where it is, but have the intake behind the monitor and the power line rewired internally. It will likely be a SFF PSU as well. Without the requirement for that arrangement of instrument panel (large analog gauges), the enclosed base will probably go away entirely and merely be the leg structure.
Posted on Reply
#5
Ergosum
Awesome! Now all I need is a 1, a 9, and a 10 and I'll have run the gamut.
Posted on Reply
#6
biffzinker
ErgosumAwesome! Now all I need is a 1, a 9, and a 10 and I'll have run the gamut.
It has potential to be something more than in it's current form so your not getting a 1 from me. :P
Posted on Reply
Dec 24th, 2024 11:19 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts