Report an Error
NVIDIA Quadro 7000
- Graphics Processor
- GF110
- Cores
- 512
- TMUs
- 64
- ROPs
- 48
- Memory Size
- 6 GB
- Memory Type
- GDDR5
- Bus Width
- 384 bit
GPU
I/O
Bottom
Back
Recommended Gaming Resolutions:
- 1600x900
- 1920x1080
- 2560x1440
The Quadro 7000 was an enthusiast-class professional graphics card by NVIDIA, launched on May 2nd, 2012. Built on the 40 nm process, and based on the GF110 graphics processor, the card supports DirectX 12. The GF110 graphics processor is a large chip with a die area of 520 mm² and 3,000 million transistors. It features 512 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 48 ROPs. NVIDIA has paired 6 GB GDDR5 memory with the Quadro 7000, which are connected using a 384-bit memory interface. The GPU is operating at a frequency of 651 MHz, memory is running at 851 MHz (3.4 Gbps effective).
Being a dual-slot card, the NVIDIA Quadro 7000 draws power from 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin power connector, with power draw rated at 204 W maximum. Display outputs include: 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video. Quadro 7000 is connected to the rest of the system using a PCI-Express 2.0 x16 interface. The card measures 248 mm in length, 111 mm in width, and features a dual-slot cooling solution. Its price at launch was 14499 US Dollars.
Being a dual-slot card, the NVIDIA Quadro 7000 draws power from 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin power connector, with power draw rated at 204 W maximum. Display outputs include: 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video. Quadro 7000 is connected to the rest of the system using a PCI-Express 2.0 x16 interface. The card measures 248 mm in length, 111 mm in width, and features a dual-slot cooling solution. Its price at launch was 14499 US Dollars.
Graphics Processor
Graphics Card
- Release Date
- May 2nd, 2012
- Generation
-
Quadro Fermi
(x000)
- Predecessor
- Quadro FX Tesla
- Successor
- Quadro Kepler
- Production
- End-of-life
- Launch Price
- 14,499 USD
- Bus Interface
- PCIe 2.0 x16
- Reviews
- 26 in our database
Relative Performance
Based on TPU review data: "Performance Summary" at 1920x1080, 4K for 2080 Ti and faster.
Performance estimated based on architecture, shader count and clocks.
Clock Speeds
- GPU Clock
- 651 MHz
- Shader Clock
- 1301 MHz
- Memory Clock
-
851 MHz
3.4 Gbps effective
Memory
- Memory Size
- 6 GB
- Memory Type
- GDDR5
- Memory Bus
- 384 bit
- Bandwidth
- 163.4 GB/s
Render Config
- Shading Units
- 512
- TMUs
- 64
- ROPs
- 48
- SM Count
- 14
- L1 Cache
- 64 KB (per SM)
- L2 Cache
- 768 KB
Theoretical Performance
- Pixel Rate
- 18.23 GPixel/s
- Texture Rate
- 41.66 GTexel/s
- FP32 (float)
- 1,332 GFLOPS
- FP64 (double)
- 666.1 GFLOPS (1:2)
Board Design
- Slot Width
- Dual-slot
- Length
- 248 mm
9.8 inches
- Width
- 111 mm
4.4 inches
- TDP
- 204 W
- Suggested PSU
- 550 W
- Outputs
- 1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
- Power Connectors
- 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
- Board Number
- P1030 SKU 505
Graphics Features
- DirectX
- 12 (11_0)
- OpenGL
- 4.6
- OpenCL
- 1.1
- Vulkan
- N/A
- CUDA
- 2.0
- Shader Model
- 5.1
GF110 GPU Notes
| PureVideo HD: VP4 VDPAU: Feature Set C GF110 has 4 GPCs each capable of 8 pixels per clock. This limits complete GPU to 32 pixels per clock and because of that it can't feed all 48 ROPs when they all require data at the same time. Additional ROPs however can be used for MSAA (because it doesn't require additional data from rasterizers, while giving more work to ROPs.) The complete die contains 64 texture address units and 256 texture filtering units. Latest Drivers: Windows XP / Server 2003 x64: GeForce Release 368.81 Quadro Release R319 U2 (321.01) Tesla Release 340.62 / R319 U2 (321.01) Windows Vista: GeForce Release 365.19 Quadro Release R346 U7 (348.40) Tesla Release 340.84 Windows 7 / 8 / 8.1 / 10 (x32 / x64): GeForce Release 391.35 Quadro Release R375 U11 (377.83) Tesla Release 340.84 / 412.29 |
Nov 5th, 2024 18:23 EST
change timezone
Latest GPU Drivers
New Forum Posts
- Are the 2 mentioned monitors a good upgrade over my current one? (6)
- 2022-X58/1366 PIN Motherboards NVME M.2 SSD BIOS MOD Collection (760)
- What are you playing? (22122)
- 5950x/5900x on a low end trash mb-black friday sale (6)
- E-cores still evolve. But is there a reason for it? (112)
- Laptop battery degrading or charger issue (9)
- Ryzen 7950X on air..? (38)
- Dragon Age: The Veilguard performance analysis (40)
- New RTX 5090 + 9800X3D build: ASUS TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI a good choice? (59)
- Post your Anvil's Storage score for SSD (37)
Popular Reviews
- Dragon Age: The Veilguard Performance Benchmark Review
- SilverStone SETA A2 Review
- DDR5 Memory Performance Scaling with AMD Zen 5
- Call of Duty: Black Ops 6 Performance Benchmark Review - AMD FTW
- Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Review
- Ocypus Iota C70 BK ARGB Review
- G-Wolves Hati-R 8K Review
- Enermax PlatiGemini 1200 W Review
- Intel Core Ultra 7 265K Review
- I\OAudio SOGNO In-Ear Monitors Review - 2 DD, 6 BA, All Harman
Controversial News Posts
- AMD Falling Behind: Radeon dGPUs Absent from Steam's Top 20 (170)
- Quick Denuvo DRM Cracks Cost Game Publishers 20% in Revenue, According to Study (136)
- AMD Introduces Next-Generation AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D Processor, $479, Nov 7 (124)
- MSI OCLab Reveals Ryzen 9000X3D 11-13% Faster Than 7000X3D, AMD Set to Dominate "Arrow Lake" in Gaming (123)
- Apple and Samsung in the Fray to Acquire Intel: Rumor (121)
- AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D Comes with 120W TDP, 5.20 GHz Boost, All Specs Leaked (120)
- Intel's Core Ultra 9 285K Performance Claims Leaked, Doesn't Beat i9-14900K at Gaming (114)
- NVIDIA Tunes GeForce RTX 5080 GDDR7 Memory to 32 Gbps, RTX 5070 Launches at CES (112)