Report an Error
NVIDIA Quadro K5200
- Graphics Processor
- GK110B
- Cores
- 2304
- TMUs
- 192
- ROPs
- 48
- Memory Size
- 8 GB
- Memory Type
- GDDR5
- Bus Width
- 256 bit
GPU
I/O
Back
Recommended Gaming Resolutions:
- 1600x900
- 1920x1080
- 2560x1440
The Quadro K5200 was a professional graphics card by NVIDIA, launched on July 22nd, 2014. Built on the 28 nm process, and based on the GK110B graphics processor, the card supports DirectX 12. The GK110B graphics processor is a large chip with a die area of 561 mm² and 7,080 million transistors. Unlike the fully unlocked GeForce GTX 780 Ti, which uses the same GPU but has all 2880 shaders enabled, NVIDIA has disabled some shading units on the Quadro K5200 to reach the product's target shader count. It features 2304 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 48 ROPs. NVIDIA has paired 8 GB GDDR5 memory with the Quadro K5200, which are connected using a 256-bit memory interface. The GPU is operating at a frequency of 667 MHz, which can be boosted up to 771 MHz, memory is running at 1502 MHz (6 Gbps effective).
Being a dual-slot card, the NVIDIA Quadro K5200 draws power from 1x 6-pin power connector, with power draw rated at 150 W maximum. Display outputs include: 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort 1.2. Quadro K5200 is connected to the rest of the system using a PCI-Express 3.0 x16 interface. The card measures 267 mm in length, 111 mm in width, and features a dual-slot cooling solution.
Being a dual-slot card, the NVIDIA Quadro K5200 draws power from 1x 6-pin power connector, with power draw rated at 150 W maximum. Display outputs include: 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort 1.2. Quadro K5200 is connected to the rest of the system using a PCI-Express 3.0 x16 interface. The card measures 267 mm in length, 111 mm in width, and features a dual-slot cooling solution.
Graphics Processor
Graphics Card
- Release Date
- Jul 22nd, 2014
- Generation
-
Quadro Kepler
(Kx200)
- Predecessor
- Quadro Fermi
- Successor
- Quadro Maxwell
- Production
- End-of-life
- Bus Interface
- PCIe 3.0 x16
- Reviews
- 26 in our database
Relative Performance
Based on TPU review data: "Performance Summary" at 1920x1080, 4K for 2080 Ti and faster.
Performance estimated based on architecture, shader count and clocks.
Clock Speeds
- Base Clock
- 667 MHz
- Boost Clock
- 771 MHz
- Memory Clock
-
1502 MHz
6 Gbps effective
Memory
- Memory Size
- 8 GB
- Memory Type
- GDDR5
- Memory Bus
- 256 bit
- Bandwidth
- 192.3 GB/s
Render Config
- Shading Units
- 2304
- TMUs
- 192
- ROPs
- 48
- SMX Count
- 12
Theoretical Performance
- Pixel Rate
- 37.01 GPixel/s
- Texture Rate
- 148.0 GTexel/s
- FP32 (float)
- 3.553 TFLOPS
- FP64 (double)
- 148.0 GFLOPS (1:24)
Board Design
- Slot Width
- Dual-slot
- Length
- 267 mm
10.5 inches
- Width
- 111 mm
4.4 inches
- TDP
- 150 W
- Suggested PSU
- 450 W
- Outputs
- 2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
- Power Connectors
- 1x 6-pin
- Board Number
- P2081 SKU 502
Graphics Features
- DirectX
- 12 (11_1)
- OpenGL
- 4.6
- OpenCL
- 3.0
- Vulkan
- 1.2.175
- CUDA
- 3.5
- Shader Model
- 6.5 (5.1)
GK110B GPU Notes
| NVENC: 1st Gen NVDEC: 1st Gen PureVideo HD: VP5 VDPAU: Feature Set D L1 Cache is configurable from 16 KB up to 48 KB per SMX GK110B has 5 GPCs each capable of 8 pixels per clock. This limits complete GPU to 40 pixels per clock and because of that it can't feed all 48 ROPs when they all require data at the same time. Additional ROPs however can be used for MSAA (because it doesn't require additional data from rasterizers, while giving more work to ROPs.) Latest Drivers: Windows XP / Server 2003 x64: Quadro Release R319 U2 (321.01) Windows Vista: GeForce Release 365.19 Quadro Release R346 U7 (348.40) / R352 BETA (352.86) Windows 7 / 8 / 8.1 / 10 / 11 (x32 / x64): GeForce Release 391.35 / 475.06 Quadro Release R390 U9 (392.37) / R470 U16 (474.82) Data Center Release 427.11 Tesla Release 441.22 Windows 10 / 11 x64: GeForce Release 474.89 Quadro Release R470 U16 (474.82) Data Center Release 474.82 |
Nov 5th, 2024 18:25 EST
change timezone
Latest GPU Drivers
New Forum Posts
- Are the 2 mentioned monitors a good upgrade over my current one? (6)
- 2022-X58/1366 PIN Motherboards NVME M.2 SSD BIOS MOD Collection (760)
- What are you playing? (22122)
- 5950x/5900x on a low end trash mb-black friday sale (6)
- E-cores still evolve. But is there a reason for it? (112)
- Laptop battery degrading or charger issue (9)
- Ryzen 7950X on air..? (38)
- Dragon Age: The Veilguard performance analysis (40)
- New RTX 5090 + 9800X3D build: ASUS TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI a good choice? (59)
- Post your Anvil's Storage score for SSD (37)
Popular Reviews
- Dragon Age: The Veilguard Performance Benchmark Review
- SilverStone SETA A2 Review
- DDR5 Memory Performance Scaling with AMD Zen 5
- Call of Duty: Black Ops 6 Performance Benchmark Review - AMD FTW
- Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Review
- Ocypus Iota C70 BK ARGB Review
- G-Wolves Hati-R 8K Review
- Enermax PlatiGemini 1200 W Review
- Intel Core Ultra 7 265K Review
- I\OAudio SOGNO In-Ear Monitors Review - 2 DD, 6 BA, All Harman
Controversial News Posts
- AMD Falling Behind: Radeon dGPUs Absent from Steam's Top 20 (170)
- Quick Denuvo DRM Cracks Cost Game Publishers 20% in Revenue, According to Study (136)
- AMD Introduces Next-Generation AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D Processor, $479, Nov 7 (124)
- MSI OCLab Reveals Ryzen 9000X3D 11-13% Faster Than 7000X3D, AMD Set to Dominate "Arrow Lake" in Gaming (123)
- Apple and Samsung in the Fray to Acquire Intel: Rumor (121)
- AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D Comes with 120W TDP, 5.20 GHz Boost, All Specs Leaked (120)
- Intel's Core Ultra 9 285K Performance Claims Leaked, Doesn't Beat i9-14900K at Gaming (114)
- NVIDIA Tunes GeForce RTX 5080 GDDR7 Memory to 32 Gbps, RTX 5070 Launches at CES (112)