Test Setup
All measurements are performed utilizing a custom designed and built load tester, called Faganas, which is able to stress PSUs up to 1800 Watts. We also use a DS1M12 (Stingray) oscilloscope, a CHY 502 thermometer, a Fluke 175 multimeter and an Instek GPM-8212 power meter. Furthermore, in our setup we have included a wooden box, which along with a heating element is used as a Hot Box. Finally, we have at our disposal three electronic loads (Array 3711A, 300W), a Rigol 1052E oscilloscope and a CEM DT-8852 sound level meter. In the near future we plan to acquire six additional loads to complete our new test set up, which with the help of our custom built software will have the same capabilities with the, ultra expensive, Chroma ATEs. In
this article you will find more details about our equipment and the review methodology we follow.
Voltage Regulation Charts
The following charts show the voltage values of the main rails, recorded over a range from 60W to the maximum specified load, and the deviation (in percent), when compared with the voltage values at 60W load.
Efficiency Chart
In this chart you will find the efficiency of CSP-X1200CB at low loads and at loads equal to 20-100% of PSU’s maximum rated load.
Voltage Regulation and Efficiency Measurements
The first set of tests reveals the stability of voltage rails and the efficiency of CSP-X1200CB. The applied load equals to (approximately) 20%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 80% and 100%, of the maximum load that the PSU can handle. In addition, we conduct two more tests. In the first we stress the two minor rails (5V & 3.3V) with the maximum load that our tester can apply to these rails, while the load at +12V is only 2A and in the second test we dial the maximum load that +12V can handle while load at minor rails is minimum.
Voltage Regulation & Efficiency Testing Data Club 3D CSP-X1200CB |
---|
Test | 12 V | 5 V | 3.3 V | Power (DC/AC) | Efficiency | Temp (In/Out) | PF/AC Volts |
20% Load | 18.375A | 1.945A | 2.202A | 242.56W | 87.98% | 42.5°C | 0.943 |
12.267V | 5.025V | 3.353V | 275.70W | 47.2°C | 230.2V |
40% Load | 36.590A | 4.834A | 6.079A | 490.71W | 89.44% | 44.7°C | 0.977 |
12.209V | 4.968V | 3.285V | 548.65W | 51.1°C | 230.6V |
50% Load | 44.601A | 6.793A | 8.075A | 602.91W | 89.25% | 47.1°C | 0.983 |
12.179V | 4.930V | 3.248V | 675.50W | 55.2°C | 229.3V |
60% Load | 54.001A | 6.780A | 8.065A | 715.63W | 89.12% | 48.8°C | 0.987 |
12.151V | 4.920V | 3.237V | 803.00W | 57.6°C | 229.9V |
80% Load | 73.744A | 8.752A | 9.671A | 965.00W | 88.37% | 49.2°C | 0.991 |
12.090V | 4.869V | 3.187V | 1092.00W | 58.7°C | 226.9V |
100% Load | 93.095A | 8.733A | 9.642A | 1194.56W | 87.32% | 44.6°C | 0.993 |
12.050V | 4.842V | 3.161V | 1368.00W | 53.9°C | 226.8V |
Crossload 1 | 2.004A | 19.781A | 16.927A | 173.47W | 78.02% | 48.7°C | 0.934 |
12.219V | 4.832V | 3.155V | 222.35W | 53.7°C | 228.5V |
Crossload 2 | 96.778A | 1.841A | 2.108A | 1184.73W | 87.82% | 45.2°C | 0.993 |
12.077V | 4.927V | 3.259V | 1349.00W | 54.7°C | 225.1V |
The PSU couldn't complete CL2 and 100% load tests with close to 50°C ambient, so we had to lower the temperature inside the hotbox a little bit. Efficiency is pretty high and peaks at 89.44% with 40% load. Voltage regulation at +12V is close to 2%, at 5V a little under 4% and at 3.3V goes out of ATX limits with 6.01% deviation. As it seems the 3.3V VRM is pretty weak. Overall we expected much better voltage regulation on the minor rails. At least +12V performed really well and you should keep in mind that 1.95% deviation on this rail was registered through a very wide, 66W-1200W, load range.
Efficiency at Low Loads
In the next tests, we measure the efficiency of CSP-X1200CB at loads much lower than 20% of its maximum rated load (the lowest load that the 80 Plus Standard measures). The loads that we dial are (approximately) 40, 65 and 90W. This is important for scenarios in which a typical office PC is in idle with power saving turned on.
Efficiency at Low Loads Club 3D CSP-X1200CB |
---|
Test # | 12 V | 5 V | 3.3 V | Power (DC/AC) | Efficiency | PF/AC Volts |
1 | 1.986A | 1.969A | 2.218A | 41.80W | 64.06% | 0.762 |
12.292V | 5.038V | 3.366V | 65.25W | 230.4V |
2 | 3.989A | 1.965A | 2.214A | 66.36W | 72.21% | 0.842 |
12.290V | 5.035V | 3.363V | 91.90W | 229.7V |
3 | 6.082A | 1.961A | 2.212A | 92.05W | 77.91% | 0.889 |
12.290V | 5.033V | 3.361V | 118.15W | 230.1V |
Efficiency at low loads is very low. Since the large capacity of the PSU is a big handicap in these tests, we did not expect much. Unfortunately actual performance is fairly dissapointing, we would like to see around 80% in test #3.
Power Consumption in Idle & Standby
In the table below you will find the power consumption and the voltage values of all rails (except -12V), when the PSU is in idle mode (On but without any load at its rails) and the power consumption when the PSU is in standby (without any load at 5VSB).
Idle / Standby Club 3D CSP-X1200CB |
---|
Mode | 12 V | 5 V | 3.3 V | 5VSB | Power (AC) | PF/AC Volts |
Idle | 12.318V | 5.068V | 3.397V | 5.123V | 16.10W | 0.371 |
230.8V |
Standby | 0.12W | 0.005 |
230.7V |
Vampire power is surprisingly low, so the PSU easily meets ErP Lot 6 requirements.