Optimus Foundation CPU Block (Intel) Review 34

Optimus Foundation CPU Block (Intel) Review

Performance Summary & Performance per Dollar »

Thermal Performance

Test System

Test System
Processor:Intel Core i9-9900K @ 3.7 GHz base / 5.0 GHz OC
Motherboard:MSI MEG Z390 ACE
Provided by: MSI
Memory:2x 8 GB XPG Gammix D10@ 3000 MHz 16-18-18
Provided by: XPG
Video Card:NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Hard disk:CORSAIR Force LE 480 GB SSD
Provided by: CORSAIR
Power Supply:EVGA SuperNova 750G2
Case:Custom test bench
Operating System:Windows 10 64-bit
TIM:Noctua NT-H1
Provided by: Noctua

Test Methodology

A Swiftech MCP35x2 pump, an Aquaero 6 XT controller, and a Black Ice Nemesis GTX 480 radiator with Noiseblocker NB-eLoop B12-3 fans complete the loop. The GPU is not placed in the loop to make the only source of heat the CPU and, thus, the CPU block itself. Average flow rate is set to 1 GPM and calibrated in-line temperature sensors are used to measure the coolant's temperature.

Everything required is placed inside a hotbox, and the ambient temperature is set to 25 °C. Thermal paste cure time is taken into account, and three separate mounts/runs are done for statistical accuracy and to remove chances of any mounting-related anomalies. For each run, a 30 min AIDA64 load test is used, and CPU core temperatures are measured using the same, with the average core temperature recorded at the end of each run. A delta T of CPU core and loop temperature is thus calculated for each run, with an average delta T that is then obtained across all three runs. This way, the cooling solution is taken out of the picture.

Test Results


Note that metal top blocks generally performed slightly better than the non-metal top blocks in my hotbox with active ventilation. With this in mind, it was all the more impressive that the Optimus Foundation with the acrylic top outperformed all other blocks sans the Optimus Signature with the metal top. This definitely means the company has a good formula with the design of the block as a whole and the spring-less installation combining high mounting pressure with a thin TIM spread. I also did a test with the older installation method, and I had already seen some leeway with the washers to where the performance was slightly worse, confirming that both the cooling engine and the new installation contribute positively. There is no 5–6 °C improvement over the other blocks as some customers have reported, which other factors can account for, including different CPUs across platforms with AMD's Ryzen chiplet design perhaps taking more advantage of the bigger cooling engine here, different testing methodologies, and perhaps some people seeing what they want to see.
Next Page »Performance Summary & Performance per Dollar
View as single page
Nov 24th, 2024 12:39 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts