Monday, June 27th 2016

AMD "Vega 10" GPU Crosses a Development Milestone

AMD Radeon Technologies Group (RTG) chief Raja Koduri was in Shanghai last week to meet with one of the design teams of the "Polaris10" and the upcoming "Vega10." He tweeted that development of "Vega10" had just crossed a milestone, although it's a long way to go before you can see it. The 5th generation Graphics CoreNext architecture, and successor to the upcoming "Polaris" architecture, "Vega" promises a higher performance/Watt than "Polaris," which in turn boasts of a large energy efficiency leap over its predecessor.

One of the most notable derivatives of "Vega" is the "Vega10," poised to be a performance-segment GPU, which will make it to the market alongside "Vega11," a larger enthusiast-segment chip. The Vega10 is rumored to feature 4,096 stream processors spread across 64 compute units, and is expected to be a competitor to NVIDIA's GP104 silicon. The larger Vega11 could compete with larger chips based on the "Pascal" architecture, such as the GP102.
Add your own comment

42 Comments on AMD "Vega 10" GPU Crosses a Development Milestone

#1
ZoneDymo
gawd damn it, dont make me look forward to this just when Im considering getting an RX480 or GTX1060 whenever that will show itself
Posted on Reply
#2
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
FAQ#1: Twitter in Shanghai?
Ans. The free-trade zone around Pudong allows western social networks such as Twitter.
Posted on Reply
#3
Dethroy
ZoneDymogawd damn it, dont make me look forward to this just when Im considering getting an RX480 or GTX1060 whenever that will show itself
Do you have any comprehensible reason to upgrade as things are now? Or is it merely the upgrade itch getting the upper hand?
I know that feeling all too well. But I've stuck out for so long and my GTX 670 still manages playable framerates at basically everything I throw at it. The Borg claim that resistance is futile. I'd say that you are better than that :rockout:
Posted on Reply
#4
bug
So now, not only do we know nothing about Vega10, we also don't know anything about this supposed milestone it just past.
Not the most informative piece of news, I have to admit.
Posted on Reply
#5
ZoneDymo
DethroyDo you have any comprehensible reason to upgrade as things are now? Or is it merely the upgrade itch getting the upper hand?
I know that feeling all too well. But I've stuck out for so long and my GTX 670 still manages playable framerates at basically everything I throw at it. The Borg claim that resistance is futile. I'd say that you are better than that :rockout:
I actually have a bit of a need for it, The Division is entirely unplayable for me (my card not being supported by that game does not help) and the free weekend of a Warhammer game was also not the greatest experience.
I would also love ot make use of features like VCE/Nvenc and DSR/VSR which are all relegated to gpu's some gens beyond mine.
Posted on Reply
#6
ZoneDymo
bugSo now, not only do we know nothing about Vega10, we also don't know anything about this supposed milestone it just past.
Not the most informative piece of news, I have to admit.
Well considering the pushed Vega forwards on the release schedule I guess its nice to know that from this point in time it seems they are on track to make that ermm rushed? release date.
Posted on Reply
#7
Nosada
bugSo now, not only do we know nothing about Vega10
Let the FUD and rumours commence!

It'll have eleventybillion shaders, all of which are running at warp 9.9. It'll do 7-dimensional gaming faster than your toaster, and run for 7 years at 100% on a cellphone battery. Also, it cures cancer and beats up superman. And all of that for just $4.99! Order now!!!
Posted on Reply
#8
Ungari
ZoneDymoI actually have a bit of a need for it, The Division is entirely unplayable for me (my card not being supported by that game does not help) and the free weekend of a Warhammer game was also not the greatest experience.
Wow! Especially when you consider that The Division was dumbed down so as not to outstrip the console performance.
Posted on Reply
#9
Chaitanya
Waiting for 480 reviews, and Amd drops info on Vega.
Posted on Reply
#10
the54thvoid
Intoxicated Moderator
ZoneDymoWell considering the pushed Vega forwards on the release schedule I guess its nice to know that from this point in time it seems they are on track to make that ermm rushed? release date.
I saw that rumour but did AMD confirm a 2016 release because the road maps said 2017. This news doesn't expand on release, if anything it says it's a long way off. Unfortunately.
Posted on Reply
#11
rtwjunkie
PC Gaming Enthusiast
the54thvoidI saw that rumour but did AMD confirm a 2016 release because the road maps said 2017. This news doesn't expand on release, if anything it says it's a long way off. Unfortunately.
I thought about a month and a half ago AMD confirmed they had moved Vega release forward to October.
Posted on Reply
#12
bug
ZoneDymoWell considering the pushed Vega forwards on the release schedule I guess its nice to know that from this point in time it seems they are on track to make that ermm rushed? release date.
How does this "news" tell us Vega10 is on track? We don't know what milestones it was supposed to hit and when. Maybe they just hit some milestone they were supposed to hit in March? (just kidding)
Posted on Reply
#13
bug
NosadaLet the FUD and rumours commence!

It'll have eleventybillion shaders, all of which are running at warp 9.9. It'll do 7-dimensional gaming faster than your toaster, and run for 7 years at 100% on a cellphone battery. Also, it cures cancer and beats up superman. And all of that for just $4.99! Order now!!!
What a joke. So it doesn't do my laundry, after all.
Posted on Reply
#15
efikkan
rtwjunkieI thought about a month and a half ago AMD confirmed they had moved Vega release forward to October.
No, there is no confirmation at this point.
If Vega were to be released in October, then QA samples should be out by now, which has not happened yet...
Posted on Reply
#16
rtwjunkie
PC Gaming Enthusiast
efikkanNo, there is no confirmation at this point.
If Vega were to be released in October, then QA samples should be out by now, which has not happened yet...
Read prior post to yours.
Posted on Reply
#17
efikkan
rtwjunkieRead prior post to yours.
I've seen that forum post a long time ago, and it even contains bogus information. "Vega 10" will be the big chip, "Vega 11" will be the smaller one.
Posted on Reply
#18
rtwjunkie
PC Gaming Enthusiast
efikkanI've seen that forum post a long time ago, and it even contains bogus information. "Vega 10" will be the big chip, "Vega 11" will be the smaller one.
I can neither confirm nor deny your view, since we really don't know timelines. I just gave the link which may or may not be factual. However, May 11="a long time ago"? o_O Seriously?!
Posted on Reply
#20
rtwjunkie
PC Gaming Enthusiast
Divide Overflow"AMD reportedly decided to pull the launch of its next big silicon, Vega10, from its scheduled early-2017 launch, to October 2016."

I'm looking forward to Vega too, but what was the source of this "report"? Take it with a grain of salt people, or be subject to the consequences of your own wild expectations.
I have no speculations or expectations. :D I just threw out that article which laid claim to a move forward of the release. Nothing more.

BTW, BTA's source is listed below the post he wrote. Whenever there is a "source", he lists it like that.
Posted on Reply
#21
Divide Overflow
rtwjunkieI have no speculations or expectations. :D I just threw out that article which laid claim to a move forward of the release. Nothing more.
Then as efikkan pointed out, there is no confirmation from AMD at this point.

Sorry, rtwjunkie, not targeting you specifically. The expectations comment was more to the wider audience at large. :)
Posted on Reply
#22
bug
Divide OverflowThen as efikkan pointed out, there is no confirmation from AMD at this point.
AMD is into some shady practices lately, as far as marketing is concerned.
They've also moved Zen to 2017 and I had one of their developers tell me Zen was never planned to come out in 2016, despite several presentations bearing AMD's logo I showed him.
Imho, they're going for the rumour mill, because they can retract anything afterwards.

Edit: Of course, I could be wrong. But that's the impression they give me lately.
Posted on Reply
#23
HD64G
My opinion is that the milestone they celebrated is that the 1st ES of Vega 10 hits above their target in clocks and efficiency. That probably means that it will come sooner than they were expecting in order to battle big guns of nVidia. If I am wrong, I can't see why they made a fuss about... :confused:
Posted on Reply
#24
efikkan
rtwjunkieI can neither confirm nor deny your view, since we really don't know timelines. I just gave the link which may or may not be factual. However, May 11="a long time ago"? o_O Seriously?!
It's not a matter of view, Vega 10 is going to be bigger than Vega 11 like with Polaris. Even the Polaris specs in that forum post is wrong.

A few days ago we got information that Vega is soon finishing development. So the final design is not even taped out yet, which means that QA samples are at least 3 months after tape out, and the finished product is 6-9 months away. Remember that GP104 was finished in development and taped out in ~June 2015.
Posted on Reply
#25
Caring1
efikkanA few days ago we got information that Vega is soon finishing development. So the final design is not even taped out yet, which means that QA samples are at least 3 months after tape out, and the finished product is 6-9 months away. Remember that GP104 was finished in development and taped out in ~June 2015.
Finishing development can mean tape out and production has been completed and it is close to release to the consumer.
AMD have something cooking that beats a 1080 and it's only 4Gb.
I've been seeing a few FS benches come through like this one in Icestorm.
www.3dmark.com/is/3839964?_ga=1.71611927.507117041.1462523653
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
May 21st, 2024 11:12 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts