Wednesday, March 30th 2022

G.Skill Announces DDR5-6000 CL30 64GB (32GB x2) Memory Kit

G.SKILL International Enterprise Co., Ltd., the world's leading manufacturer of extreme performance memory and gaming peripherals, is delighted to announce the launch of a high-capacity, ultra-low-latency DDR5-6000 CL30 64 GB (32 GB x2) overclocked performance memory kit under the Trident Z5 family, designed for the latest 12th Gen Intel Core desktop processors and Intel Z690 chipset motherboard.

As the leader in developing high performance memory products, G.SKILL launches an all new high-capacity, ultra-low-latency dual-channel memory kit, rated at a blistering DDR5-6000 CL30-40-40-96 in 64 GB (32 GB x2) kit capacity. Using only the best-in-class memory components to achieve high-speeds with 32 GB module capacity, this extreme overclocked memory specification represents the next step in high-capacity DDR5 performance. The screenshot below shows this memory kit validated with the Intel Core i7-12700K processor and ASUS ROG Maximus Z690 Hero motherboard.
Red Dot Design Award 2022
The all-new Trident Z5 RGB and Ripjaws S5 DDR5 memory series are the proud recipient of the Red Dot Award: Product Design 2022 for outstanding and innovative design. Both DDR5 memory series exceeded the juror panel's strict criteria and expectations in nine areas of product standards.

The DDR5-6000 CL30 64 GB (32 GB x2) memory specification under the Trident Z5 RGB series will be available in 2022 Q2 via G.SKILL worldwide distribution partners.
Add your own comment

8 Comments on G.Skill Announces DDR5-6000 CL30 64GB (32GB x2) Memory Kit

#1
watzupken
The most important piece of information is missing. What’s the price?

Given how ridiculously overpriced DDR5 memory is at this point in time, this sort of exotic and high end RAMs may likely cost more than the CPU + mother board bundle.
Posted on Reply
#2
asdkj1740
watzupkenThe most important piece of information is missing. What’s the price?

Given how ridiculously overpriced DDR5 memory is at this point in time, this sort of exotic and high end RAMs may likely cost more than the CPU + mother board bundle.
you should expect this type of kit would be much more expensive than 2 packs of 16G*2, simply because 32g*2 kit = verified but two packs of 2*16g in 16g*4 setup are not.
Posted on Reply
#3
ThrashZone
Hi,
Not sure how they can claim "ultra low latency" without running a latency test and showing it 30-40-40 96 are just tested latency timings and seem typical for hynix loose as a goose

6000 at cl30 verses 3000 cl15 is mediocre at best in ddr4 land same as the last kit 6400 cl32 lol

How about running aida 64 and showing this ultra low latency.

Funny they have aida 64 open too :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#4
asdkj1740
ThrashZoneHi,
Not sure how they can claim "ultra low latency" without running a latency test and showing it 30-40-40 96 are just tested latency timings and seem typical for hynix loose as a goose

6000 at cl30 verses 3000 cl15 is mediocre at best in ddr4 land same as the last kit 6400 cl32 lol

How about running aida 64 and showing this ultra low latency.

Funny they have aida 64 open too :laugh:
for the osd display on the top left corner.
Posted on Reply
#5
ThrashZone
asdkj1740for the osd display on the top left corner.
Hi,
Which shows same thing as under it on the other mem test
And none show this "ultra low latency # " as stated in the article
Posted on Reply
#6
junglist724
ThrashZoneHi,
Not sure how they can claim "ultra low latency" without running a latency test and showing it 30-40-40 96 are just tested latency timings and seem typical for hynix loose as a goose

6000 at cl30 verses 3000 cl15 is mediocre at best in ddr4 land same as the last kit 6400 cl32 lol

How about running aida 64 and showing this ultra low latency.

Funny they have aida 64 open too :laugh:
First world latency is kind of meaningless when comparing DDR4 and DDR5 and it isn't representative of actual latency when under load. Intel memory latency checker actually checks latency when under different loads. These are the results I get on a couple of my machines. Under heavy loads DDR5 has lower latency.
9900K - 4000C17
Measuring Loaded Latencies for the system
Using all the threads from each core if Hyper-threading is enabled
Using Read-only traffic type
Inject Latency Bandwidth
Delay (ns) MB/sec
==========================
00000 165.68 49340.6
00002 165.01 49374.5
00008 160.51 49251.6
00015 157.99 49293.0
00050 140.68 48834.0
00100 116.91 48605.5
00200 70.11 41206.0
00300 54.60 30216.0
00400 50.30 23396.2
00500 51.18 18983.2
00700 46.21 14322.5
01000 44.86 10557.1
01300 44.48 8487.4
01700 43.73 6874.0
02500 44.01 5146.2
03500 42.93 4135.1
05000 42.67 3354.4
09000 42.42 2540.5
20000 42.24 1979.8

12900k - 6200C32
Measuring Loaded Latencies for the system
Using all the threads from each core if Hyper-threading is enabled
Using Read-only traffic type
Inject Latency Bandwidth
Delay (ns) MB/sec
==========================
00000 138.86 94911.2
00002 137.67 95062.7
00008 132.36 95048.7
00015 127.26 95018.2
00050 109.84 94738.0
00100 99.70 95056.9
00200 73.20 86546.1
00300 64.37 61858.1
00400 61.71 48823.9
00500 60.13 40213.8
00700 58.79 29914.4
01000 57.67 21767.6
01300 57.14 17229.5
01700 57.06 13555.9
02500 56.50 9693.6
03500 56.32 7302.2
05000 56.80 5452.9
09000 56.90 3548.2
20000 58.42 2189.6
Posted on Reply
#7
Keullo-e
S.T.A.R.S.
watzupkenThe most important piece of information is missing. What’s the price?

Given how ridiculously overpriced DDR5 memory is at this point in time, this sort of exotic and high end RAMs may likely cost more than the CPU + mother board bundle.
The high pricing always been the thing for an early adopter when a new RAM generation has been released.
Posted on Reply
#8
truehighroller1
Don't try to use it on the apex motherboard early production 2021 boards lmfao.
Posted on Reply
May 21st, 2024 19:50 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts