lasThe 295X2 uses 16.1 WHQL Crimson, performance is pretty much the same as current. Many of the games you play are what i consider less demanding. But several of them will make your setup go to it's knees at 2160p if you don't lower IQ. Crysis maxed will for sure, and that game is over 3 years old now. Alot of games won't run on 390 CF at 2160p unless IQ is lowered.

By playable you mean 20-30 fps like consoles or?

Then I understand.

arbiterPcper just released benchmarks using nano in CF, 295x2 and 980TI's in SLI. As i did expect when they released the images here showing a fury pro vs single 980ti to make fury pro look good performance wise, when compared to 2 980ti's in SLI which would be a FAIR test well fury got beat.
www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphics-Cards/AMD-Radeon-Pro-Duo-Review

cdawall

This is the impressive part of all that. I imagine if you got the temps down the fury would lower power consumption, just like the fermi cards (I halfed my power consumption overclocked vs stock coolers).

but on the note of the benchmarks the duo won 3 of the 4 games run for average FPS. Lost 3dmark (go figure) and TW3 (go figure) to me this shows that the pro duo is more powerful at least stock vs stock. Unluckily for AMD we all know how the 980Ti clocks and how the fury does not. Even with the TDP unlocked I don't expect that to change.

arbiterduo pro won 3 outta 4 games? um are you sure you looked at same page i linked cause according to story it lost 3 outta 4. The one it won was by 2% at 4k but lost at 1440p. 2% could be seem as margin of error so being even where as ones it lost were 10+%.

arbiterduo pro won 3 outta 4 games? um are you sure you looked at same page i linked cause according to story it lost 3 outta 4. The one it won was by 2% at 4k but lost at 1440p. 2% could be seem as margin of error so being even where as ones it lost were 10+%.

cdawall

This is the impressive part of all that. I imagine if you got the temps down the fury would lower power consumption, just like the fermi cards (I halfed my power consumption overclocked vs stock coolers).

but on the note of the benchmarks the duo won 3 of the 4 games run for average FPS. Lost 3dmark (go figure) and TW3 (go figure) to me this shows that the pro duo is more powerful at least stock vs stock. Unluckily for AMD we all know how the 980Ti clocks and how the fury does not. Even with the TDP unlocked I don't expect that to change.

SlizzoWhen it comes to games, you really need to pay attention to the frametimes that PC Per posts. Those don't lie about actual user experience with the cards. While all the AMD cards did really well in average FPS, their frame times were all over the place.

This will, hopefully, be fixed in a driver. But for now even AMD is not recommending the RPD for gamers.

arbiterPcper just released benchmarks using nano in CF, 295x2 and 980TI's in SLI. As i did expect when they released the images here showing a fury pro vs single 980ti to make fury pro look good performance wise, when compared to 2 980ti's in SLI which would be a FAIR test well fury got beat.
www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphics-Cards/AMD-Radeon-Pro-Duo-Review

KananThese are child ills that get fixed soon I guess, too soon to disqualify a card for its premature drivers.

RealNeilI have two GTX-980 Ti cards in SLI, two GTX-980 cards in SLI, and soon I'll have a pair of R9-390X Toxic cards in Crossfire. (I have the first one here already)

I think that I'll just sit back and wait for a few months (maybe longer) because I'm not in dire need of an upgrade. All three gaming PCs are ready.

GhostRyderThat's not true, it's always a dire need to upgrade :p.

arbiterSince card been out for a while and CF pretty much same as this duo gpu i think saying drivers are premature isn't really a valid argument since setting 2 cards up on CF should and would produce same issues.

FluffmeisterIt's DOA, you're spot on.

arbiterfury pro should been out when they announced it months ago. But the delay they put on it pretty much put it in shark tank with the new nvidia cards 2 of them draw same power range as fury but gaming wise should be much faster least on paper cause well SLI/CF is hard to get right.