Wednesday, August 16th 2017
Alphacool Intros Eiswolf GPX-Pro ATI RX Vega and the NexXxoS GPX for RX Vega
ATI RX Vega cooler, Alphacool has the perfect cooling solutions for the start of the new AMD Vega graphics card generation. The NexXxoS GPX Vega Version now offers an improved backplate with a side shield to cover the PCB. This also improves its cooling performance, since heat is distributed more evenly over the front connection. If you use a graphics card with a NexXxoS GPX cooler and want to switch over to an AMD Vega, you'll be happy to hear about the corresponding upgrade kits for your cooler.
The Eiswolf GPX-Pro will still be an AIO solution, and will still come pre-filled with an integrated pump built around new "reverse flow" technology for whisper-quiet operation. The pure copper radiator from the well-known NexXxoS series with 120mm and a thickness of 45mm provides outstanding cooling performance.
For bigger solutions an alternative ST30 version has been created - "The Eiswolf GPX-Pro 240mm." Of course, the Eiswolf GPX-Pro will also be available in a pre-filled Eisbaer Ready version, which can be integrated into any cooling loop. You can attach it with the pre-assembled quick connectors, or use the standard G1/4" connectors at any connection point.
The Eiswolf GPX-Pro will still be an AIO solution, and will still come pre-filled with an integrated pump built around new "reverse flow" technology for whisper-quiet operation. The pure copper radiator from the well-known NexXxoS series with 120mm and a thickness of 45mm provides outstanding cooling performance.
16 Comments on Alphacool Intros Eiswolf GPX-Pro ATI RX Vega and the NexXxoS GPX for RX Vega
not nice!here is link you can look, i spend 4sec type i google and found answer :-/
www.alphacool.com/search?sSearch=GPX-Pro+ATI+RX+Vega
The vrms actually run hotter with a fullbody heatsink under sustained load! Running a single bench doesn't load the sink up but run said game over 30 minutes which is typical and actually very little time for a typical game session and you will run them vrms higher than stock cooling. lmao.
www.swiftech.com/HD7900-HSF.aspx
**Btw, I want to point out the missing data line for furmark and using the heatsink w/o no fan at max oc/volts. Ever wonder why that data set is missing? It's pretty clear the overheating card numbers would not be a great selling point to use this thing w/o a fan for active cooling. And put into context in real cases where the heatsink will be on bottom it just exacerbates the problem two fold. No active cooling and the card gets freaking heatsoaked by this massive sink.
If you need more dissipation, you can quick-connect more radiators too.
I'm thinking I might go with the 420 CPU block and then join the loop to one of these, that also gives one two pumps as well and an easy install - assuming a suitable case can be found that the 420 will go into. :)
The pricing is not bad at all when compared to e.g. a Kraken X62.
It (heatsink on the VRMs) is connected to the cold plate. There is a single aluminium block attached to the GPU, RAM and VRMs. The cold plate is then attached to that, so the heat in the aluminium plate (that comes from all 3 components)) is being pulled out by the water block.
This is not the same as traditional cooling where the cold plate/block is only attached to the GPU (or RAM/GPU in the case of HBM).
The other idea with this design is they can use one block for all cards, they just need a different "heat plate" for each one.
That's my understanding of the design anyway.
I suppose you could call it "Semi-active" perhaps, if you want to be pedantic. ;)