Sunday, January 27th 2019
LG 32UL750-W is a 32-inch 4K Monitor with DisplayHDR 600 and USB-C
LG introduced the 32UL750-W, a 32-inch (technically 31.5-inch) 4K Ultra HD monitor boasting of VESA DisplayHDR 600 certification, and support for AMD FreeSync. The monitor also offers an internal feature that attempts to convert SDR content to HDR via post-processing. Based on a VA panel, the monitor offers 178°/178° viewing angles, 4 ms (GTG) response-time, support for 1.07 billion colors (10 bpc), and up to 60 Hz refresh-rate.
Other key panel specs include 3000:1 static-contrast ratio and 400 cd/m² maximum brightness. Display inputs include two HDMI 2.0, a DisplayPort 1.4, and USB type-C (with DisplayPort wiring). If this USB connection also includes USB link-layer wiring, the monitor will use it to drive a 2-port USB 3.0 (type-A) hub. The monitor is expected to be priced around $750.
Other key panel specs include 3000:1 static-contrast ratio and 400 cd/m² maximum brightness. Display inputs include two HDMI 2.0, a DisplayPort 1.4, and USB type-C (with DisplayPort wiring). If this USB connection also includes USB link-layer wiring, the monitor will use it to drive a 2-port USB 3.0 (type-A) hub. The monitor is expected to be priced around $750.
45 Comments on LG 32UL750-W is a 32-inch 4K Monitor with DisplayHDR 600 and USB-C
I'l bet this LG is the same panel with some electronic overdrive and not really able to do real HDR.
Carry on , nothing to see here...
Yea thats totally gonna work..
Its expensive cause you need quite wide color gamut (much more than regular display) and reasonably fast response time (Black-to-Black). Extra gamut was always really expensive thing.
Ofc my little amateur photog self is kinda happy seeing all new HDR displays. :D Cause it also means that probably better color days are coming.
when this inevitably goes on sale for 500 bucks or so, im prob gonna buy it. I can't stand VA. so its either this one or LG nano-IPS
Plus no word on the Freesync range.
It's a lot less bright than this one.
LG also has (by specification) very nice colour space, few useful features and is visually attractive.
AOC is just a panel (often a good one) with all other costs minimized. Bad stands, bad backlight, issues with colour reproduction, occasional glitches and poor port choice - some of the things usually mentioned in reviews.
Well, you get what you pay for.Not everyone is a gamer. And even most gamers don't care about >60Hz.
But a 4K 32" version with a VA panel with 4000:1 contrast ratio would be a dream that I would pay $750 for!
And why would anyone pay for this? Because there are still people in the world that need fidelity instead of 144Hz.
Also, this has a bigger brother for ~$950 that's IPS based. Between these and the RTX 2060, I may have my first taste of 4k this year ;)
Edit: Still, we need reviews, I expect how backlight dimming is implemented to have a make or break effect here.
That said, still a while away from 120Hz refresh rates with this size screen and res.... Ah one day :)
And yes, larger panels tend to be slower.
I miss my Dell 3008's but then I'd like to try a higher refreshing panel as I hear, that's where it's at :)
Having never had a high re-fresh rated screen, I'd like to see what the differences are before buying but I can't see that'll happen so I'll just have to buy something on review/recommendation sadly.. (ish)
Before I was using 2 5970's and 2 5870's to do the same with 3 Dell 3008's!! :D (res was 7680 x 1600!!) Then I had a burst of no brain cells and bought 3 GTX 580 3Gb cards and it sort of stemmed from there :) I can post some pics up if you'd like but I'll do that on another thread rather than spoiling this one :)