Friday, August 11th 2023

TerraMaster Launches F2-212 F4-212 and U4-212 Private Cloud NAS

TerraMaster, a professional brand that focuses on providing innovative storage products for homes and businesses, recently released new design NAS series F2-212, F4-212 and U4-212, support TRAID, BTRFS file system, Snapshot and TFSS providing stronger data backup and better home multimedia experience, which perfectly meet the requirement of personal and home users. Among the 3 models, the sample of F2-212 for review will be firstly available soon in August.

More Modern Exterior Design
The 212 NAS series adopts brand-new design elements and color matching, and has a more fashionable and modern appearance design, better heat dissipation, lower noise, and more convenient installation and use.
Install Hard Drives within 10 seconds
Tool-free hard drive tray design makes easy installation and removal of hard drives without tools.

And the new Push-lock unique design automatically locks the hard drive tray when you insert the hard drive, preventing the hard drive from falling out or disconnecting.

Support TOS 5 System and TRAID
Equipped with a more powerful ARM V8.2 Cortex-A55 64-bit 1.7 GHz quad-core processor, the 212 NAS series run the latest TOS 5 system and support the TRAID flexible disk array management tool which provides users with an optimized, flexible and elastic disk array management solution.

Snapshot and TFSS Protection
Support Snapshot and TerraMaster File System Snapshot (TFSS) based on Btrfs file systems, providing fully data protection and recovery solutions in case of data loss, whether it is due to operation errors or hard disk damage, and even ransomware attacks.

More Secure Private Cloud Storage
F2-212 supports up to 44 TB of raw storage, and F4-212 and U4-212 can support up to 88 TB, which can provide large-capacity private cloud storage for families and small teams. Equipped with the latest TOS 5 operating system, which includes a large number of backup, file sharing and synchronization applications, data backup and remote work collaboration can be easily applied.

Support the latest iOS and Android TNAS Mobile mobile client, you can use a variety of mobile devices to access and securely manage files anytime, anywhere, and by installing the Terra Photo application in the TNAS Application Center, users can use intelligent management tools to backup, share and organize classified photos. Can handle more demanding tasks and a higher number of concurrent users than its predecessors.

The 212 series products can also be integrated with a variety of public clouds, such as supporting Google Drive, Amazon S3, Dropbox and OneDrive and other cloud disk two-way synchronization function, easily open the data channel between your private cloud and public cloud disk, enjoy the convenience of cloud living and more secure data storage.

Home Multimedia Center
Powerful 4K video hardware decoding capability, and compatible with uPnP/DLNA protocol. With TerraMaster dedicated "Multimedia Server" app or third-party multimedia servers (Emby, Plex), it can stream videos to a variety of multimedia devices including smart phones, tablets, Roku, Apple TV, Google Chromecast, Amazon Fire TV, and smart TV, delivering users constant, reliable entertainment experiences.

The F2-212 is available now at Amazon and TerraMaster partners and resellers worldwide for a suggested retail price of $169.99. For more details, please visit
Source: TerraMaster
Add your own comment

10 Comments on TerraMaster Launches F2-212 F4-212 and U4-212 Private Cloud NAS

#1
Chrispy_
In terms of hardware these are very similar to the entry-level DS223J and DS423J. The MSRP of these is also very similar to those competing models, but having used TerraMaster's F5 NAS a year ago, I wouldn't want to pay Synology prices for TerraMaster's software.

This range needs something else to sell it - like an M.2 SSD slot or 2.5Gb networking, otherwise it needs to undercut Synology on price. The TerraMaster OS and web interface is okay, certainly usable enough but it's a long way behind both Synology and QNAP. I'm an enterprise QNAP user of both QuTS and QuTS Hero interfaces, and even though it's great, Synology DSM is still the best offering by a decent margin. It's a shame Synology are just total d*cks about disk, ssd and RAM compatibility!
Posted on Reply
#2
TheLostSwede
News Editor
Chrispy_In terms of hardware these are very similar to the entry-level DS223J and DS423J. The MSRP of these is also very similar to those competing models, but having used TerraMaster's F5 NAS a year ago, I wouldn't want to pay Synology prices for TerraMaster's software.

This range needs something else to sell it - like an M.2 SSD slot or 2.5Gb networking, otherwise it needs to undercut Synology on price. The TerraMaster OS and web interface is okay, certainly usable enough but it's a long way behind both Synology and QNAP. I'm an enterprise QNAP user of both QuTS and QuTS Hero interfaces, and even though it's great, Synology DSM is still the best offering by a decent margin. It's a shame Synology are just total d*cks about disk, ssd and RAM compatibility!
When it comes to value for money, Asustor seem hard to beat. Not convinced about their software still, but they're getting there.

I'll stick to my DIY OMV NAS though, at least it's less chance of getting hacked, as it has no cloud services that I have no control over installed on it.
Posted on Reply
#3
Chrispy_
TheLostSwedeWhen it comes to value for money, Asustor seem hard to beat. Not convinced about their software still, but they're getting there.

I'll stick to my DIY OMV NAS though, at least it's less chance of getting hacked, as it has no cloud services that I have no control over installed on it.
I should probably look at OMV for simple home network NASes, I use TrueNAS a bit (from back when it was called FreeNAS) but I've always thought it bit too much work for your average Joe at home.
Posted on Reply
#4
TheLostSwede
News Editor
Chrispy_I should probably look at OMV for simple home network NASes, I use TrueNAS a bit (from back when it was called FreeNAS) but I've always thought it bit too much work for your average Joe at home.
Yeah, the True/Free NAS people see, to be elitists as well that point out you need at least 32 GB of ECC memory for your ZFS pool so you don't get bit rot...

I'm sure bit rot can happen, but considering I've recovered data from half failed 15 plus year old floppy disks and the files that weren't corrupted due to the poor storage of the disks, didn't suffer from bit rot...

OMV looks pretty slick these days, it's obviously not super fancy, but as it's quite a basic NAS OS on its own, it doesn't need a super fance GUI.
Is it perfect, nah, but it does the job and it's regularly updated.

Posted on Reply
#5
ymdhis
TheLostSwedeYeah, the True/Free NAS people see, to be elitists as well that point out you need at least 32 GB of ECC memory for your ZFS pool so you don't get bit rot...

I'm sure bit rot can happen, but considering I've recovered data from half failed 15 plus year old floppy disks and the files that weren't corrupted due to the poor storage of the disks, didn't suffer from bit rot...

OMV looks pretty slick these days, it's obviously not super fancy, but as it's quite a basic NAS OS on its own, it doesn't need a super fance GUI.
Is it perfect, nah, but it does the job and it's regularly updated.

I haven't checked OMV since at least 3-4 years, does it allow you to set up iscsi natively without needing legacy plugins? That was the deal breaker and why I had to go with truenas.
Posted on Reply
#6
Chrispy_
ymdhisI haven't checked OMV since at least 3-4 years, does it allow you to set up iscsi natively without needing legacy plugins? That was the deal breaker and why I had to go with truenas.
If you need iSCSI, you're probably not a casual home user looking at OMV!
Posted on Reply
#7
TheLostSwede
News Editor
ymdhisI haven't checked OMV since at least 3-4 years, does it allow you to set up iscsi natively without needing legacy plugins? That was the deal breaker and why I had to go with truenas.
Not sure, I don't use iSCSI.
There's this though.

Posted on Reply
#8
Chrispy_
TheLostSwedeYeah, the True/Free NAS people see, to be elitists as well that point out you need at least 32 GB of ECC memory for your ZFS pool so you don't get bit rot...

I'm sure bit rot can happen, but considering I've recovered data from half failed 15 plus year old floppy disks and the files that weren't corrupted due to the poor storage of the disks, didn't suffer from bit rot...

OMV looks pretty slick these days, it's obviously not super fancy, but as it's quite a basic NAS OS on its own, it doesn't need a super fance GUI.
Is it perfect, nah, but it does the job and it's regularly updated.

It's actually been a while since I looked at homebrew NAS hardware and it's remarkably expensive/difficult to get a low-power mITX motherboard+CPU combo these days. For re-using old hardware that people would otherwise retire or throw out, something like TrueNAS or OMV looks great - but for something efficient and low-power there doesn't seem to be much. I kinda miss the days of cheap mITX boards with <5Watt Z-series Atoms soldered next to a SoDIMM slot and some SATA ports.

What is there to replace that these days, or is it a market segment that died for good?
Posted on Reply
#9
TheLostSwede
News Editor
Chrispy_It's actually been a while since I looked at homebrew NAS hardware and it's remarkably expensive/difficult to get a low-power mITX motherboard+CPU combo these days. For re-using old hardware that people would otherwise retire or throw out, something like TrueNAS or OMV looks great - but for something efficient and low-power there doesn't seem to be much. I kinda miss the days of cheap mITX boards with <5Watt Z-series Atoms soldered next to a SoDIMM slot and some SATA ports.

What is there to replace that these days, or is it a market segment that died for good?
Like this?
www.asus.com/motherboards-components/motherboards/prime/prime-n100i-d-d4/

Maybe not the ideal motherboard, due to the PCIe x1 and only one onboard SATA, but that's obviously just something cheap.
The issue is cases, not really motherboards. None of the low power mini-ITX boards have been good to build a NAS around though, as there have always been some stupid compromise.

I got a "proper" NAS case with four hot swappable drives and obviously went a bit crazy on the hardware side, but I had the CPU and RAM and wanted something I wouldn't have to upgrade for years to come.
Posted on Reply
#10
Chrispy_
TheLostSwedeLike this?
www.asus.com/motherboards-components/motherboards/prime/prime-n100i-d-d4/

Maybe not the ideal motherboard, due to the PCIe x1 and only one onboard SATA, but that's obviously just something cheap.
The issue is cases, not really motherboards. None of the low power mini-ITX boards have been good to build a NAS around though, as there have always been some stupid compromise.

I got a "proper" NAS case with four hot swappable drives and obviously went a bit crazy on the hardware side, but I had the CPU and RAM and wanted something I wouldn't have to upgrade for years to come.
Ah yeah, that board is a disaster for storage. I guess it's designed for thin-clients?
Jonsbo N1 or Node 302 are fine cheap NAS cases, Hot-swappable is nice but many of the home NAS options from the big players aren't hot-swappable at all and these things tend to get one or two disk changes in their entire lifespan.
Posted on Reply
Nov 21st, 2024 09:30 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts