Monday, August 12th 2024

Intel Arc "Battlemage" Graphics Card with 12GB of 19 Gbps GDDR6 Memory Surfaces

A prototype discrete GPU based on the Intel Arc "Battlemage" graphics architecture was spotted in a public boot log by Intel GFX Continuous Integration group. The group is probably testing a prototype discrete GPU with a Linux driver. The OS loads its driver at boot, which puts out a few messages in the boot log, including explicit mention of "Battlemage" as BMG. It also mentions its memory size to be 12 GB, a memory speed of 19 Gbps, and a memory bus width of 192-bit.

It is hence likely that this is a mid-tier GPU from the series, with the top tier one probably featuring a 256-bit memory interface. This aligns with Intel's strategy of targeting the bulk of the gaming graphics market, instead of gunning for the enthusiast class. The new "Battlemage" architecture is expected to make Intel contemporary against rival architectures in the segment, such as NVIDIA "Ada" and AMD RDNA 3, although it remains to be seen if it can square off against the next-generation NVIDIA "Blackwell" and AMD RDNA 4.
Source: HotHardware
Add your own comment

30 Comments on Intel Arc "Battlemage" Graphics Card with 12GB of 19 Gbps GDDR6 Memory Surfaces

#26
kondamin
Vya DomusI am just wondering if you're using superlatives like "extremely overvalued" for a company like AMD what's left for the rest of them ? Ultra giga hyper overvalued ?
well companies like apple microsoft google have serious sustainable income streams from their appstore, o365 and azure advertising...
they have OK P/E ratios (price to earning) for every dollar they make their market cap is that much bigger
it's said that anything below 50 is in a normal economic climate Good, over 50 would be over valued.
in recessions that number would be lower.

AMD's P/E as of last week was 161
Nvidia 60
intel 20 (after last weeks correction)
microsoft 34
google 31
apple 33
facebook 45
Tesla 56

so Nvidia & tesla would be over valued.
and AMD is extremely over valued.

but sure, there are companies that are trading even higher than what they earn, and I honestly don't know what i would call companies that have +1000 ratio's
Posted on Reply
#27
Visible Noise
DavenBusiness is business. It is very possible that Intel cancels its entire GPU efforts as they cut cost which means no Battlemage. You cannot dismiss current events because they are not convenient. Real people are behind these real business decisions. As they lose cash quarter over quarter, Intel will be faced with some hard decisions.
As long as we’re making up stories, it’s very possible that AMD cancels its entire GPU efforts.
Posted on Reply
#28
Hecate91
The financial troubles Intel are having is anything but made up lol.
If the best Intel can come up with is a 12GB card, then its not enough and it would make no sense as a business decision to continue with dedicated graphics.
Posted on Reply
#29
phanbuey
DavenWe do need more competition in the GPU market. I just wish it would be from someone other than Intel. Given the latest track record, any moves on behalf of Intel will be a wasted effort.
That's what people used to say about AMD and their Bulldozers... now you have Zen.
Posted on Reply
#30
Dristun
SSGBryanLooking at the TPU GPU database - that is 4k performance, averaging over 90fps.

Last time I checked, that and below is about 95% of the market.
You're looking at it the wrong way around. Margins are much fatter in those top 5% so odds are very good that Jensen will sell 10 5090s and earn more money than Intel selling 50 of their middle-end battlemages. It's all the money in the world in those top 5%.
That said, I wish Intel all the best and depending on pricing I might get one of those cards to see how they improved. Maybe one day they'll compete at the top too.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Feb 7th, 2025 13:31 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts