• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

Simple WCG PPD Estimator

Oh wow, that's awesome dude! :respect: thanks to all!
 
Thanks, I'm very proud of what he's done :toast:

He says there are plans for some changes, including making values 'stick' after a calculation & a slider to select CPU usage :toast:
 
That would be great. Maybe upon selecting usage, it can give you a estimated TDP?
 
I'm not so sure how that would work, as TDP isn't linear :ohwell:

But I'll ask him and see what we can do :toast:
 
Just thought it was a cool idea for those who are concerned about power draw you know. If not it's totally fine with me.
 
Awesome. Don't need apps now unless you find yourself without an internet connection.
 
Chicken Patty said:
Just thought it was a cool idea for those who are concerned about power draw you know. If not it's totally fine with me.
Click to expand...
While I agree that it would be great, I don't see any way that it could be done :ohwell:
FordGT90Concept said:
Awesome. Don't need apps now unless you find yourself without an internet connection.
Click to expand...

I think it'll be useful to have an app, I frequently don't have internet access, so an offline version would still be great :)
 
That's fine ION, not an issue. :toast:
 
I should have the SandyBridge i7 2600K up and running today. Let me know if there is anything I can do to help you develop the estimator for that CPU. Think twylith was getting his soon too so at least we can compare to get more accurate numbers.
 
If you could let it run for a week, and then get me a SS of this page...
wcgpage.png

....and provide me with your clocks/OS, I'll build a new version with support for the SB i3s and i7s.
 
Honestly, even if you just go and boost up the multi ~5x and leave everything else stock it should be fine ;)
 
[Ion] said:
Honestly, even if you just go and boost up the multi ~5x and leave everything else stock it should be fine ;)
Click to expand...

Planning on compiling a PPD/Watt chart, so partly why I'll leave it stock till I get the time.
 
Ahh, I see. Well, I'd be very interested in the results, I'd love a 2600k at some point.
 
New version available!!
Now with support for i7 Sandy Bridge CPUs.​
 

Attachments

brandonwh64 said:
Wonder if ION will be back to make another update?
Click to expand...

Doubt it, he's not even answering my emails anymore. Looks like we lost him for good. :(
 
Chicken Patty said:
Unless someone else is interested in creating their own?
Click to expand...

If I had his code, I could try but he knows all the values of the PPD estimating stuff and what each CPU MAY make

*EDIT*

I see forGT made a version, maybe we can get his source code
 
Where is his version, same thread?
 
I have my source code for it but I don't know how he got those numbers. The relevant bits:
Code: 
            _ProcessorDatabase.Add(new Processor("AMD", "Athlon X2", "", 1.7));
            _ProcessorDatabase.Add(new Processor("AMD", "Athlon 64 X2", "", 1.7));
            _ProcessorDatabase.Add(new Processor("AMD", "Phenom I X3", "", 2.3));
            _ProcessorDatabase.Add(new Processor("AMD", "Phenom I X4", "", 3.2));
            _ProcessorDatabase.Add(new Processor("AMD", "Athlon II X2", "", 2));
            _ProcessorDatabase.Add(new Processor("AMD", "Athlon II X3", "", 3));
            _ProcessorDatabase.Add(new Processor("AMD", "Athlon II X4", "", 3.9));
            _ProcessorDatabase.Add(new Processor("AMD", "Phenom II X2", "", 2.1));
            _ProcessorDatabase.Add(new Processor("AMD", "Phenom II X3", "", 3.1));
            _ProcessorDatabase.Add(new Processor("AMD", "Phenom II X4", "", 4.2));
            _ProcessorDatabase.Add(new Processor("AMD", "Phenom II X6", "", 6.7));
            _ProcessorDatabase.Add(new Processor("Intel", "Core 2 Duo", "Conroe", 2));
            _ProcessorDatabase.Add(new Processor("Intel", "Core 2 Duo", "Mobile", 2));
            _ProcessorDatabase.Add(new Processor("Intel", "Core 2 Duo", "Wolfdale", 2.2));
            _ProcessorDatabase.Add(new Processor("Intel", "Core 2 Quad", "Kentsfield", 4));
            _ProcessorDatabase.Add(new Processor("Intel", "Core 2 Quad", "Yorkfield", 4.45));
            _ProcessorDatabase.Add(new Processor("Intel", "Core i3/i5", "Clarkdale", 4.1));
            _ProcessorDatabase.Add(new Processor("Intel", "Core i5", "Lynnfield", 5.9));
            _ProcessorDatabase.Add(new Processor("Intel", "Core i7", "Quad-core", 8.1));
            _ProcessorDatabase.Add(new Processor("Intel", "Core i7", "Hexa-core", 12.1));

It is C#. Send me a PM if you want the source. I'll throw in the WCG/BOINC Configurator source too (they're in the same solution).
 
You wanna give this a shot Brandon?

Thanks FORD! :toast:
 
Hmmm I am currently doing C++ not C# , it may not work the same.
 
I can update it if I new what values to add.

C# is like pointerless C/C++.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top