Simple WCG PPD Estimator

[Chicken Patty]

Oh wow, that's awesome dude! thanks to all!

 

[[Ion]]

Thanks, I'm very proud of what he's done

He says there are plans for some changes, including making values 'stick' after a calculation & a slider to select CPU usage

 

[Chicken Patty]

That would be great. Maybe upon selecting usage, it can give you a estimated TDP?

 

[[Ion]]

I'm not so sure how that would work, as TDP isn't linear

But I'll ask him and see what we can do

 

[Chicken Patty]

Just thought it was a cool idea for those who are concerned about power draw you know. If not it's totally fine with me.

 

[FordGT90Concept]

Awesome. Don't need apps now unless you find yourself without an internet connection.

 

[[Ion]]

Just thought it was a cool idea for those who are concerned about power draw you know. If not it's totally fine with me.

While I agree that it would be great, I don't see any way that it could be done

Awesome. Don't need apps now unless you find yourself without an internet connection.

I think it'll be useful to have an app, I frequently don't have internet access, so an offline version would still be great

 

[Chicken Patty]

That's fine ION, not an issue.

 

[KieX]

I should have the SandyBridge i7 2600K up and running today. Let me know if there is anything I can do to help you develop the estimator for that CPU. Think twylith was getting his soon too so at least we can compare to get more accurate numbers.

 

[[Ion]]

If you could let it run for a week, and then get me a SS of this page...

....and provide me with your clocks/OS, I'll build a new version with support for the SB i3s and i7s.

 

[KieX]

If you could let it run for a week, and then get me a SS of this page...
http://img.techpowerup.org/110113/wcgpage.png
....and provide me with your clocks/OS, I'll build a new version with support for the SB i3s and i7s.

Cool will do. I'll run it as stock for now as I don't have time to play around with it :shadedshu

 

[[Ion]]

Honestly, even if you just go and boost up the multi ~5x and leave everything else stock it should be fine

 

[KieX]

Honestly, even if you just go and boost up the multi ~5x and leave everything else stock it should be fine

Planning on compiling a PPD/Watt chart, so partly why I'll leave it stock till I get the time.

 

[[Ion]]

Ahh, I see. Well, I'd be very interested in the results, I'd love a 2600k at some point.

 

[[Ion]]

New version available!!
Now with support for i7 Sandy Bridge CPUs.​

 

[brandonwh64]

Wonder if ION will be back to make another update?

 

[Chicken Patty]

Wonder if ION will be back to make another update?

Doubt it, he's not even answering my emails anymore. Looks like we lost him for good.

 

[brandonwh64]

Doubt it, he's not even answering my emails anymore. Looks like we lost him for good.

Awww So sad! Wished we had the code he used so someone could update it.

 

[Chicken Patty]

Awww So sad! Wished we had the code he used so someone could update it.

Unless someone else is interested in creating their own?

 

[brandonwh64]

Unless someone else is interested in creating their own?

If I had his code, I could try but he knows all the values of the PPD estimating stuff and what each CPU MAY make

*EDIT*

I see forGT made a version, maybe we can get his source code

 

[Chicken Patty]

Where is his version, same thread?

 

[FordGT90Concept]

I have my source code for it but I don't know how he got those numbers. The relevant bits:

            _ProcessorDatabase.Add(new Processor("AMD", "Athlon X2", "", 1.7));
            _ProcessorDatabase.Add(new Processor("AMD", "Athlon 64 X2", "", 1.7));
            _ProcessorDatabase.Add(new Processor("AMD", "Phenom I X3", "", 2.3));
            _ProcessorDatabase.Add(new Processor("AMD", "Phenom I X4", "", 3.2));
            _ProcessorDatabase.Add(new Processor("AMD", "Athlon II X2", "", 2));
            _ProcessorDatabase.Add(new Processor("AMD", "Athlon II X3", "", 3));
            _ProcessorDatabase.Add(new Processor("AMD", "Athlon II X4", "", 3.9));
            _ProcessorDatabase.Add(new Processor("AMD", "Phenom II X2", "", 2.1));
            _ProcessorDatabase.Add(new Processor("AMD", "Phenom II X3", "", 3.1));
            _ProcessorDatabase.Add(new Processor("AMD", "Phenom II X4", "", 4.2));
            _ProcessorDatabase.Add(new Processor("AMD", "Phenom II X6", "", 6.7));
            _ProcessorDatabase.Add(new Processor("Intel", "Core 2 Duo", "Conroe", 2));
            _ProcessorDatabase.Add(new Processor("Intel", "Core 2 Duo", "Mobile", 2));
            _ProcessorDatabase.Add(new Processor("Intel", "Core 2 Duo", "Wolfdale", 2.2));
            _ProcessorDatabase.Add(new Processor("Intel", "Core 2 Quad", "Kentsfield", 4));
            _ProcessorDatabase.Add(new Processor("Intel", "Core 2 Quad", "Yorkfield", 4.45));
            _ProcessorDatabase.Add(new Processor("Intel", "Core i3/i5", "Clarkdale", 4.1));
            _ProcessorDatabase.Add(new Processor("Intel", "Core i5", "Lynnfield", 5.9));
            _ProcessorDatabase.Add(new Processor("Intel", "Core i7", "Quad-core", 8.1));
            _ProcessorDatabase.Add(new Processor("Intel", "Core i7", "Hexa-core", 12.1));

It is C#. Send me a PM if you want the source. I'll throw in the WCG/BOINC Configurator source too (they're in the same solution).

 

[Chicken Patty]

You wanna give this a shot Brandon?

Thanks FORD!

 

[brandonwh64]

Hmmm I am currently doing C++ not C# , it may not work the same.

 

[FordGT90Concept]

I can update it if I new what values to add.

C# is like pointerless C/C++.