- Joined
- Aug 11, 2011
- Messages
- 4,357 (0.88/day)
- Location
- Mexico
System Name | Dell-y Driver |
---|---|
Processor | Core i5-10400 |
Motherboard | Asrock H410M-HVS |
Cooling | Intel 95w stock cooler |
Memory | 2x8 A-DATA 2999Mhz DDR4 |
Video Card(s) | UHD 630 |
Storage | 1TB WD Green M.2 - 4TB Seagate Barracuda |
Display(s) | Asus PA248 1920x1200 IPS |
Case | Dell Vostro 270S case |
Audio Device(s) | Onboard |
Power Supply | Dell 220w |
Software | Windows 10 64bit |
There's nothing to not like about the 8350. Power consumption is around 10% less compared to the 1100t (3.3Ghz) and to top it off, it has two extra cores. Compared to my X6 @ 3.9Ghz, WUs take slightly longer on the 8350 to complete (about 15-20 min more) but since you're doing 8 at a time the FX has the upper hand.
The downside is that, based on some reviews I've seen, power consumption grows exponentially with overclocking. A 10% OC would increase power consumption by 20%, at 5Ghz (25% OC) you'd be looking at a 70% increase (see FX-9590). Running them stock is the sensible approach if you plan on crunching 24/7.
The downside is that, based on some reviews I've seen, power consumption grows exponentially with overclocking. A 10% OC would increase power consumption by 20%, at 5Ghz (25% OC) you'd be looking at a 70% increase (see FX-9590). Running them stock is the sensible approach if you plan on crunching 24/7.
Last edited: