Unigine Heaven 4.0 Benchmark Scores

[Durvelle27]

Please use the new thread here: http://www.techpowerup.com/forums/threads/unigine-heaven-4-0-benchmark-scores.198888/#post-3080200


***Please attach a screen capture of your results for score verification***

Benchmark setup:

1.1920x1080, Fullscreen, 8x Anti-Aliasing
2.Ultra Quality
3.Extreme Tessellation
4.No integrated GPU enabled, unless it's the only GPU in the build
5.Tessellation correctly set up on AMD cards and not bypassed in CCC
6.You must also provide correct GPU and CPU clocks
7.Must Be a Screenshot from within Heaven to be valid

It will ensure that we have consistent results.


**Scores**



Single GPU
____________

# | CPU| Frequency | GPU| GPU Clocks | Score | User Name
1.)| i7-4930K | 5.05GHz | GTX Titan | 1202/1777 | 1837 | MetalRacer
2.)| i7-2600K| 5GHz | GTX 780 Ti| 1165/1925 | 1777| devilpepper
3.)| i7-4770K | 4.2GHz | GTX 780 Ti| 1110/1750 | 1763 | Dj-Electric
4.)| i7-2600K | 4.6GHz | GTX 780 Ti| 1241/1751 | 1743 | BarbaricSoul
5.)| i7-3930K | 4.4GHz | GTX Titan | 1227/1752 | 1728 | the54thvoid
6.)| i7-3930K | 3.2GHz | R9 290X | 1247/1666 | 1691 | Eroticus
7.)| FX-8350 | 4.5GHz | GTX 780 Ti| 1138/1915 | 1684 | goninja
8.)| FX-8350 | 5.1GHz | GTX 780 | 1293/1850 | 1679 | Durvelle27
9.)| i7-2600K | 4.5GHz | GTX 780 | 1280/1778 | 1669 | Droffz
10.)| i7-4770K | 3.5GHz | GTX 780 | 1320/1750 | 1657 | MxPhenom 216
11.)| i7-920 | 3.4GHz | GTX 780 | 1238/1600 | 1565 | mdbrotha03
12.)| i7-3770K| 4.7GHz | GTX 780 | 1035/1604 | 1504 | freakshow
13.)| i7-4770K| 4.4GHz | GTX 780 | 1150/1502 | 1466 | HammerON
14.)| FX-8350 | 5GHz | R9 290 | 1150/1450 | 1465 | Durvelle27
15.)| i7-4770K| 4.3GHz | R9 290 | 1150/1420 | 1441 | SimpleTech
16.)| i7-960 | 3.8GHz | GTX 780 | 1031/1556 | 1433 | Rekkapena
17.)| i5-4670K| 4.2GHz | R9 290 | 1120/1250 | 1410 | Tupac33
18.)| i7-3770K| 4.6GHz | R9 290 | 1000/1250 | 1407 | sirbaili
19.)| Xeon W3520| 4GHz | R9 290X | 1000/1250 | 1372 | Solaris17
20.)| FX-8350 | 4.8GHz | HD 7970 | 1290/1850 | 1125 | Durvelle27
21.)| FX-8350 | 4.7GHz | HD 7970 | 1180/1680 | 1019 | MalcomXT
22.)| i5-3450 | 3.8GHz | HD 7950 | 1240/1425 | 1000 | _larry
23.)| i7-3770K| 4.5GHz | GTX 670 | 1129/1840 | 984 | Bladedrummer
24.)| FX-6350 | 4.4GHz | R9 280X | 1150/1500 | 974 | z1tu
25.)| i5-4670K| 3.4GHz | R9 280X | 1070/1550 | 943 | Valor
26.)| i7-3770K| 4.8GHz | HD 7970 | 1010/1375 | 883 | fullinfusion
27.)| i7-920 | 4.4GHz | GTX 580 | 950/1170 | 844 | GreiverBlade
28.)| i5-3450 | 3.1GHz | HD 7950 | 1000/1380 | 843 | reny900
29.)| FX-8320 | 4.4GHz | HD 7870 | 1150/1450 | 727 | Durvelle27
30.)| Xeon E3 1275 V2 | 3.5GHz | R9 270 | 1050/1500 | 702 | GreiverBlade
31.)| Phenom X4 9600B| 2.4GHz | GTX 460 | 930/1100 | 605 | GreiverBlade

Multi GPU
____________

# | CPU| Frequency | GPU| GPU Clocks | # of GPUs | Score | User Name
1.)| i7-4770K | 4GHz | GTX 780 Ti| 1124/1750 | 2 | 4025 | JHThorpe
2.)| FX-8350 | 5.02GHz| HD 7970 | 1125/1575 | 4 | 3964 | red1414
3.)| i7-4930K | 4.4GHz | GTX 780 Ti| 1175/1785 | 2 | 3232 | Paladone
4.)| i7-4770K | 4.2GHz | GTX 780 | 1190/1502 | 2 | 2858 | Gribar
5.)| i7-4770K | 4.4GHz | GTX 780 | 1150/1502 | 3 | 2838 | HammerON
6.)| i7-3770K | 4.6GHz | R9 290 | 1100/1250 | 2 | 2730 | sirbaili
7.)| i7-2700K | 4.8GHz | R9 290 | ???/??? | 2 | 2659 | freeleacher
8.)| i7-3770K | 4.8GHz | HD 7970 | 1280/1770 | 2 | 2176 | fullinfusion
9.)| i5-2500K | 4.5GHz | GTX 670 | 1050/1750 | 2 | 1846 | renozi
10.)| i7-3770K | 4.2GHz | HD 7950 | 800/1250 | 2 | 1756 | Jetster
11.)| i7-3770K | 4.2GHz | GTX 760 | 995/1750 | 2 | 1720 | havene
12.)| FX-8320 | 4.8GHz | HD 7870 | 1150/1450 | 2 | 1389 | Durvelle27
13.)| Xeon E3 1275 V2 | 3.7GHz | GTX 580 | 900/1050 | 2 | 1322 | GreiverBlade

Single Card Multi GPU
___________________










XFX HD 7970 @1290/1850+FX-8350 @4.8GHz

 

[d1nky]

this has been done and the thread had about 5 posts.

do something different, like BASIC preset. that's pure overclocking madness

 

[GreiverBlade]

wellll i never thought of running H4.0 in ultra/tess extreme FSAA 8X on my rig ... but i have to say ... naahhh my dear Revy on my desktop background say more just by the pose.

and for answering d1nky : "if my old bag can do it like that, no way any other "enthusiast" setup cant!"

 

[HammerON]

Single GTX 780 @ 1150/3005 w/ i7 4770K @ 4.4GHz:

MSI GTX 780 SLI @ 1124/3005 w/ i7 4770K @ 4.4GHz:

 

[GreiverBlade]

Single GTX 780 @ 1150/3005 w/ i7 4770K @ 4.4GHz:
http://img.techpowerup.org/131003/Capture138847.jpg

MSI GTX 780 SLI @ 1124/3005 w/ i7 4770K @ 4.4GHz:
http://img.techpowerup.org/131003/Capture137221.jpg

weeew when i see your 1st rig score im pretty proud of my rig (specially since its assembled from various 2nd hand parts and for a ridiculous price )

duhhh my downside of the day ... i found a Intel DX79SI at 80$ but i cant find anymore the i7-3820 i saw at 150$ oh well s'not my day ...

 

[Rekkapena]

GTX780 slightly oc and i7 960@3,8GHz

http://picsit.fi/k/2013/10/03/tulos.jpg

 

[Durvelle27]

List Updated

 

[_larry]

Not sure why the benchmark itself doesn't show my CPU overclock. I feel like my score should be higher, no? I'm waiting on some new case fans to allow the card to breathe better at 100% fan. The three fans on it are LOUD and require a mass of airflow. I will break 1000~ before this is over.
i5 -3450 @ 3.8ghz
7950 @ 1110core/1480mem
Score - 923

 

[the54thvoid]

GTX Titan at 1176 core, 7008 memory. i73930k @ 4.4Ghz

Also, how does a GTX 780 boosting at 1031 beat anther GTX 780 boosting at 1150 (Rekkapena versus HammerOn)? That don't seem right at all, considering HammerON has a faster processor (4.4 versus 3.8).

 

[sweet]

Also, how does a GTX 780 boosting at 1031 beat anther GTX 780 boosting at 1150 (Rekkapena versus HammerOn)? That don't seem right at all, considering HammerON has a faster processor (4.4 versus 3.8).

HammerON has a SLI setup so I guess that he benched the main card first while the 2nd card is still on the board. Heat might be the factor here.

 

[EarthDog]

this has been done and the thread had about 5 posts.

do something different, like BASIC preset. that's pure overclocking madness

Thats a lot of CPU too... and a bit pointless for a GPU thread. And he isn't using the Hwbot wrapper so, I do not think there is a 'basic' preset anyway?

If it was heat, sweet, it would throttle... If the card is below the throttling point, it wont perform and worse at the same clockspeed. My guess is drivers or something...

 

[GreiverBlade]

Not sure why the benchmark itself doesn't show my CPU overclock. I feel like my score should be higher, no? I'm waiting on some new case fans to allow the card to breathe better at 100% fan. The three fans on it are LOUD and require a mass of airflow. I will break 1000~ before this is over.
i5 -3450 @ 3.8ghz
7950 @ 1110core/1480mem
Score - 923

Unigines benchies show my 920 being at 3990mhz and CPU-Z/Bios/OHM report 4189mhz seems all post show that behavior, also your score show me i dont need to upgrade (the only upgrade in my budget, new and not 2nd hand as i allways do is about the same setup as yours)

also my GTX580 is whisper quiet thanks Prolimatech and Noiseblocker 1260rpm on 2 140mm i cant hear them if i lower the CPU fan and my HAF-XB isnt what you can call a isolated box ,i just need to change the fan on my Macho im using a Coolink Swif 120 pwm as a backup, since i put my 2 Ty-147 on the IFX-14 in the Boinc machine

im also waiting on a 2nd 580 from asus i will keep it with the DCUII cooler but im wondering if my InWin 700W gold will handle that setup

 

[EarthDog]

Heaven on the 'extreme' setting like this is NOT remotely CPU dependent. Your scores will not change much at all from stock to overclocked.

 

[_larry]

Also, how does a GTX 780 boosting at 1031 beat anther GTX 780 boosting at 1150 (Rekkapena versus HammerOn)? That don't seem right at all, considering HammerON has a faster processor (4.4 versus 3.8).

Look at the min. FPS.
I think this test requires a few passes to get cached in. There is one point where the scene froze for a second like it was loading the textures and my min. fps went from 22 to 6~. Or maybe it is just an inconsistent benchmark..

 

[the54thvoid]

Look at the min. FPS.
I think this test requires a few passes to get cached in. There is one point where the scene froze for a second like it was loading the textures and my min. fps went from 22 to 6~. Or maybe it is just an inconsistent benchmark..

Good call m8. 5.5fps is pretty low minimum

HammerOn - we demand you run the loop then bench again. That being said - I didn't cache mine (except for the first 10 seconds before running the bench)

 

[GreiverBlade]

pushing the bclk to 210 bringing that i7-920 to 4.4ghz (also the score grid shows 4.2)
getting the 580 to 950 core 1170 memory got me to 844 and min fps 16.7 instead of 7.2
indeed the cpu OC dont do much (i believe the little bump in the score and fps is only due to the card OC)

and wow 64c the highest temp i got on that card till now

 

[_larry]

THEORY CONFIRMED.
I just used a LOWER overclock and got a HIGHER min. FPS by letting the scenes fully pass before doing the benchmark. Might want to make a note of this in the OP...Time to go break 1000 now haha!

 

[GreiverBlade]

THEORY CONFIRMED.
I just used a LOWER overclock and got a HIGHER min. FPS by letting the scenes fully pass before doing the benchmark. Might want to make a note of this in the OP...

my 16fps min was achieved by directly hitting F9 at the start of the demo, no caching or letting the demo run

yahoohoo 965mhz/2365mhz throttle xD 15fps slideshow+ slight artifacting after scene 10, result : score 591 23.5 avg fps 11.8 min fps 106.2 max fps

 

[_larry]

my 16fps min was achieved by directly hitting F9 at the start of the benchmark, no caching or letting the demo run

yahoohoo 965mhz/2365mhz throttle xD 15fps slideshow+ slight artifacting after scene 10, result : score 591 23.5 avg fps 11.8 min fps 106.2 max fps

Might be different if you are running it off of an SSD or a fast hard drive. Some of the people who got below 10~fps might want to try my method. Then it will really be confirmed if their lowest fps was higher.

 

[GreiverBlade]

well i can try running it installed on the Vertex III or the Velociraptor instead of the 5k6 WD green xD

 

[_larry]

well i can try running it installed on the Vertex III or the Velociraptor instead of the 5k6 WD green xD

Don't bother. Apparently the lowest FPS doesn't even matter...I just got a score of 935 with a lowest fps of 20...only 12 points higher than my other benchmark that had a lowest fps of 6...

 

[EarthDog]

The HDD shouldnt make a difference. In the Hwbot version of Heaven (same but with a wrapper and different scoring), I run it off an SSD in one machine and HDD in another. There is ALWAYS that 'hitch' at the very beginning for me. THough running the benchmark twice the FPS do not drop as low.

 

[GreiverBlade]

Don't bother. Apparently the lowest FPS doesn't even matter...I just got a score of 935 with a lowest fps of 20...only 12 points higher than my other benchmark that had a lowest fps of 6...

well for me it made 816 to 844, 28pts more weird

 

[EarthDog]

Run variance people...

 

[GreiverBlade]

Run variance people...

i know i know (look my System Specs under "benchmark results" )