Unigine Heaven 4.0 Benchmark Scores

[Meathead77]

Not to bad for my First attempt with a mild overclock on the gtx 970.
System Specs:

I7-4790k @ 4.5ghz (only show 4ghz)
256gb Samsung 850 pro ssd
32gb ram @ 2133mhz
Msi gaming gtx 970
Asrock z97 extreme 6

 

[FX-GMC]

Not to bad for my First attempt with a mild overclock on the gtx 970.
System Specs:

I7-4790k @ 4.5ghz (only show 4ghz)
256gb Samsung 850 pro ssd
32gb ram @ 2133mhz
Msi gaming gtx 970
Asrock z97 extreme 6

View attachment 62551

1.) 1920x1080, Fullscreen, 8x Anti-Aliasing
2.) Ultra Quality
3.) Extreme Tessellation

 

[mobiuus]

msi geforce gtx770 4gb gpu:1150 mem:2000(8000) cpu:i7 4770k@4.5ghz

 

[Devil-Walker]

 

[Ja.KooLit]

you need to re bench using this setting. Check page 1

Benchmark setup:

1.) 1920x1080, Fullscreen, 8x Anti-Aliasing
2.) Ultra Quality
3.) Extreme Tessellation

 

[Devil-Walker]

my bad.

 

[zieg]

i7 4790k@4.00 (turbo@4.40) stock
gtx 780ti@941/1750 stock

2nd try

 

[MiataManiac]

Ah, I screwed up. I put my mem clock speed as 1089. That's the Boost clock, not the mem clock. Should read 1010/1852. Sorry about that!

 

[mapesdhs]

night.fox writes:
> ... Oh boy, you bring me down one more slot . Curse those 980's lol



It'll be very interesting to see how thw P7P55 WS behaves. P55 has a lower latency arch overall than
X58 from that era, but the NF200 adds latency. We shall see. Just sorting out the CPU oc atm, though
turns out I fitted the board with an 870, not an 875K (must have stuck the latter on something else).
No matter, initial testing looks like 4.3GHz should work fine (I could push it a lot higher of course,
but I don't want to risk a burnout, trying to keep vcore below 1.4, atm it's 1.38).


> 980's are really a beast.

I'm struggling not to make those few easy clicks for a 4th. Damn online shopping... 6 clicks and
it's in my house tomorrow! Must... resist...


> But it wont make me still want to replace my 290's. I like them as now although I have more itch now for extreme platform

Addictive isn't it?

One thing that's perhaps holding back my pushing the 980s is the slot spacing on these boards, typically
2-slot, so of course they sit right next to each other, making it a bit difficult to get fresh air into the middle
card and the one next to the CPU. However, one board I've not yet done much with could change that,
namely an Asrock X58 Extreme6, for which I have a 990X I've not yet done anything with. This board has
tri-slot spacing for all three main PCIe slots; here's a good picture. With three GPUs, they run at x16/x8/x8
(same as the P7P55 WS) vs. x8/x16/x16 for the M4E. I bought one because of the spacing, but while waiting
to source a CPU, I managed to bag a boxed M4E for the insanely low price of 87 UKP (this was several years
ago) along with a well priced 2700K, so I left the Extreme6 alone; got a 990X eventually, but not had time
to do much with it.

However, that's for the far future if I can ever be bothered to pull the 980s out for more testing. Most
likely I'll mess about with three 580s on the Extreme6 to begin with. Atm it just has a XEON X5570 which I
need to get rid of.

Ian.

 

[Meathead77]

Thank you for the info FX-GMC... Sorry I don't bench much. Was wondering why it got such a high score, until I went back and saw everyone was using FULL SCREEN mode.

Any rate.. Re-benched it for ya. Not sure how good this is or bad or average... With FULL screen this time.

System specs:

I7-4790k
850 Pro SSD
32gb 2133mhz ram
MSI Gaming 970 GTX (core: 1419 / memory: 7510)

 

[FX-GMC]

my bad.

1920x1064 8xAA windowed =/= 1920x1080 8xAA fullscreen

Updated.

 

[MiataManiac]

New system benchmark is finally done. i5-4690k and two GTX 980s all stock for now:

 

[s4in7]

Brand new here Just popped a reference 980 into my rig and so far it's an absolute beast.

Specs:
FX-8350 @ 4.5ghz
240gb Intel 530
8gb ram @ 1600mhz
Reference Nvidia GTX 980 (1.5GHz core/7.6GHz mem)
Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 (rev. 4)

 

[MiataManiac]

Aaaaaaaaaaaand GPUs overclocked:

Will probably overclock CPU later this week.

 

[chester7lp]

4790k @ 4.6 / 2x evga gtx980 1503 / 2000

 

[s4in7]

I guess the list at the beginning of the thread isn't being updated anymore? I was looking forward to being the only AMD FX user in the top 20 seeing as how my score places me at #12 for single GPU.

 

[HammerON]

If you look at a post a couple above yours you will notice that it was updated seveal days ago. Have a little patience.

 

[s4in7]

I'm not impatient...I was simply asking a question. But thanks.

 

[mapesdhs]

Btw s4in7, a reference 980 definitely does not have a 1500MHz core. The original reference 980's stock clock is 1126MHz.

Not sure I'd want to push one as high as 1.5, but plenty have judging by Futremark submissions.

Ian.

PS. Crazy/evil result coming shortly...

 

[Aramil]

i5 3570k @4.2Ghz (ASUS Z77 Sabertooth)
Palit GTX980 Super Jet Stream @1493Mhz Boost / 7200Mhz Mem

 

[mapesdhs]

And here we are, crazy/evil data point, three 980s on a P55 board with an i7 870 @ 4.3GHz. (mbd is an ASUS P7P55 WS Supercomputer)

I think that nabs spot 6...

Note that the 980s in this config are running at x8/x8/x16 PCIe V2.0.

I'm not going to try any oc'd runs, but it seems to add on typically some small hundreds extra.

Ian.

 

[s4in7]

Probably a good thing the list wasn't updated--I just broke into the 1900 club!

And yes mapesdhs my 980 is in fact a reference card. It's highly OC'd, but it is a reference Nvidia card--i.e. stock blower and not from a board partner like EVGA, MSI, etc.

I'm at 1550MHz core and 7.6GHz mem 24/7 stable now (well, 24/3 as I've only ran these clocks for 3 days). With auto fan control I haven't exceeded 81c, and with manual control at 75% I don't see anything above 73c. Played several hours of Far Cry 3 & 4, Lichdom, and BF4 and haven't experienced a single crash or driver reset. She's a beaut!

Top 10, I'm gunning for ya

 

[s4in7]

Annnnnnnnd #10 for single GPU.

This was achieved at 1575MHz core 7.6GHz mem. I'm not pushing her any further...that's insane to me. I know the CPU has very little to do with this benchmark, but it sure will be nice to see an FX in the top 10. I'm not testing again, so rest assured this is my final score (unless someone dislodges me).

Specs:
FX-8350 @ 4.5ghz
(2) 240gb Intel 530
8gb ram @ 1600mhz
Reference Nvidia GTX 980 (1.575GHz core/7.6GHz mem)
Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 (rev. 4)

 

[mapesdhs]

s4in7 writes:
> And yes mapesdhs my 980 is in fact a reference card. It's highly OC'd, but it is a reference Nvidia card--
> i.e. stock blower and not from a board partner like EVGA, MSI, etc.

Oh I see! Sorry, I thought you meant it was a ref card running at ref clocks.


> I'm at 1550MHz core and 7.6GHz mem 24/7 stable now ...

I worry about pushing mine that far. I'm sure they can handle it, but when they cost so much, makes me nervous.

I don't think I'll try anything mega again (ie. over 1400) until I've had a chance to read a bunch of forums, see what
people have done with the card in detail (my specific model I mean), example clocks vs. voltage/power settings, etc.


> ... and haven't experienced a single crash or driver reset. She's a beaut!

Indeed, the reference cooler really is very good. Certainly gave NVIDIA an edge for a while.


> Annnnnnnnd #10 for single GPU.

I haven't targeted single-GPU yet...


> ... but it sure will be nice to see an FX in the top 10. ...

Small confession: I do have a number of AMD setups, just not had time to delve into them much yet. Eventually
though. I have a couple of Ph2 965s, 6000+, 250, 640 and a 1090T. Got some good results with the 640 oc'd,
but that was testing with lesser GPUs.

Ian.

PS. Added a whole bunch of 980 data to my site, testing with i5 760, 2700K and 3930K. Typing up a 3DMark
summary atm which compares to 7970 CF.

 

[short2bucks]

i5 2500k @4.5Ghz
Asus 750 ti @1291 MHz Boost & 5600 MHz Mem.

Not bad for first run on a budget build (under $750)