Unigine Heaven 4.0 Benchmark Scores

[jboydgolfer]

weird ... what drivers?

oh well if it was me ... i would like Shadowplay without the crap that Geforce Experience is ...

i just had to uninstall/reinstall. these are my 1st nvidia cards in a VERY long time...iirc 5xxx or 4xxx was my jump into ATI, and been RED since, until this month when i retired the Last of a LONG line of AMD /ATI gpus, so im REALLY new to the Whole nvidia deal.

 

[jboydgolfer]

weird ... what drivers?

the experience . it is Separate from the Display driver, and the Nvidia settings software. it just disappeared .so i removed and reinstalled it.

I used to do a LOT of streaming/recording on MY AMD's, and Ill say this much, Nvidia has 100% got AMD with this Shadowplay. That is IF recording is Your thing, that Alone is worth the green over Red. I personally have NO allegiance, but that IS a fact. the Perf hit is SO tiny. and it even works with my little 750Ti.
sorry if My posts are a bit off, i am on NO sleep...things are "difficult" right now

 

[Vellinious]

"simply, clear enough for you, lol" who do you think i am? Rejzor?

also you do realize you wrote "I don't care WHAT he's looking at." and "And yes... you should always list the max clock listed by the GPU-Z sensors tab..." in the same post? contradiction? much.
so what about his 1600+ is like i explain for the 2 last post : MAX BOOST READING like my result ... clear enough for you?

until the concerned person answer : no real mean to know, and then therefore no need to try to explain me the opposite and treat me like that (i rarely use sarcasm when i try to explain something even if people cross-read )



well technically ... nope 1378 under water (hybrid) is not really a good result ... compare that to a R9-290 under water, i got the same result: +200mhz (and both are stable in game at +100mhz since +200mhz is only for bench and crash once in a blue moon, but still crash)

and 1500+ actual core clock is not ... since you read GPU-Z sensor tab : it's max boost clock, i have a reading of 1643 but my real clock is 1393 so no, my actual core clock is not 1600+, but the max sustained boost is.
unlock the potential of a 970, well that GPU really need it ... for what it is so... what's your actual settings in afterburner? +100? yep, monster OC'er

oh ... to hell with that ... ok: i am an idiot, you both are right and the other user we mention is a liar (well ... less than nVidia with the 970 ... )

You have a 980ti boosting to 1643? Got a screenshot of that? What your 980 can do, and what a 980ti can do in terms of clock speeds are two entirely different things. When I see a screenshot of a 980ti hitting 1600+ core clocks under load, with stock cooling, then I'll believe it...

GM204s overclock a lot better than the GM200s. It's not uncommon to have a GM204 pushing 1600+ pretty easy. I had a pair of 970s that would run 1620 in SLI, and the single good card would run through benchmarks at 1671.

"
oh ... to hell with that ... ok: i am an idiot, you both are right and the other user we mention is a liar (well ... less than nVidia with the 970 ..." No, I don't think he's a liar, I think he was reading the core clock and the memory clock from what Unigine told him his card was running at. You should know that those clocks are almost never right. BTW, I'd match my 970 scores up against your 290 any day. Have a 290X now too....let's measure. rofl

 

[PP Mguire]

is early 4 mE. ure wrdz confuze me...more cawphee rekwired. asap

i am Totally confused right now, my shadowplay setting options have completely disappeared from my Geforece experience wat is going on Nvidiuuchi?>

not sure what it is your replying to . I was just saying that my 970 is holding those clocks , and it is. im not certain about minus 100mhz, or whatever. MY maxed out clocks are what i posted, im not under water, btw , (not sure, theres a Lot of info that is kind of all together) this is a Ref 970, an nvidia one. One of these ...i was only commenting on the maxwells over clock good part of @Vellinious post, the rest . i didnt even read TBH

Case twinkies unite.

 

[jboydgolfer]

mobo not SLI capable only quad xfire,

 

[GreiverBlade]

You have a 980ti boosting to 1643? Got a screenshot of that? What your 980 can do, and what a 980ti can do in terms of clock speeds are two entirely different things. When I see a screenshot of a 980ti hitting 1600+ core clocks under load, with stock cooling, then I'll believe it...

GM204s overclock a lot better than the GM200s. It's not uncommon to have a GM204 pushing 1600+ pretty easy. I had a pair of 970s that would run 1620 in SLI, and the single good card would run through benchmarks at 1671.

"
oh ... to hell with that ... ok: i am an idiot, you both are right and the other user we mention is a liar (well ... less than nVidia with the 970 ..." No, I don't think he's a liar, I think he was reading the core clock and the memory clock from what Unigine told him his card was running at. You should know that those clocks are almost never right. BTW, I'd match my 970 scores up against your 290 any day. Have a 290X now too....let's measure. rofl

ok, no worries, you can stop the rofl, i get your point (but not your mean to write it ... too rofl'lol'esque at my taste).

i am done with that and over it for now all that matter for me is what my card behave, and i will hold onto that, i stop bothering you.

btw a 980 is a side-grade to a 290 (out of benchmark condition) ... so a 970 is a in between of the 2 (well the score show it, 1400 average 290, 1600 average 970, 1900 average 980) 970<290<290X/980<<<980Ti

 

[Vellinious]

1600 for a 970 is ok, but not good. 1400 for a 290 is pretty poor.

 

[jboydgolfer]

Are you saying that a 1600 heaven score is no good for a 970? The scores in the OP dont go too muchhigher than that.what 970 scores much higher? Out of curiosity.

 

[Vellinious]

Are you saying that a 1600 heaven score is no good for a 970? The scores in the OP dont go too muchhigher than that.what 970 scores much higher? Out of curiosity.

1600 is pretty decent, but high 1600's and low 1700s are doable.

 

[jboydgolfer]

o, yeah for sure. I got that 1599 on my 3rd OC attempt. Im certain i could get 1700, or pretty close to it

 

[Vellinious]

o, yeah for sure. I got that 1599 on my 3rd OC attempt. Im certain i could get 1700, or pretty close to it

Just gotta keep it cool. Let me know if you want to add some more volts.

 

[neatfeatguy]

Last update for me with my current configuration. I've hit max stable OC on my Zotac GTX 980Ti AMP! Omega.

i5-4670k at stock
GPU:
Core = 1313 (1414 boost). MSI reported 1489 max boost
Memory = 2160
GPUZ validation: http://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/details.php?id=4puaf

 

[chuck216]

OK another run at 4.7 ghz on the CPU ... BTW I think my first run may be invaild.... tessilation was set to AMD optimized by default and I think the this requires "use application settings" which is what this run is at.

 

[Vellinious]

AMD Optimized is fine. It's when you use "override application settings" and alter the level of tessellation that it gives more frames.

 

[lapino]

Just ran the benchmark because I have a hard time getting a 60fps constant in The Division. MSI GTX980Ti 6G with an Intel 6600K @ 4.4ghz, I'm getting 2423 with nvidia 362.00. Is this about right?

 

[Vellinious]

Just ran the benchmark because I have a hard time getting a 60fps constant in The Division. MSI GTX980Ti 6G with an Intel 6600K @ 4.4ghz, I'm getting 2423 with nvidia 362.00. Is this about right?

For stock clocks / mild overclock on the GPU, yeah....that's about normal.

 

[christfloyd]

 

[Pinkerton B.]

i just had to uninstall/reinstall. these are my 1st nvidia cards in a VERY long time...iirc 5xxx or 4xxx was my jump into ATI, and been RED since, until this month when i retired the Last of a LONG line of AMD /ATI gpus, so im REALLY new to the Whole nvidia deal.

mobo not SLI capable only quad xfire,

View attachment 73047

i just had to uninstall/reinstall. these are my 1st nvidia cards in a VERY long time...iirc 5xxx or 4xxx was my jump into ATI, and been RED since, until this month when i retired the Last of a LONG line of AMD /ATI gpus, so im REALLY new to the Whole nvidia deal.

When should you retire a card (taking advancement of software requirements out of the calculation)? I don't dare add any supplemental voltage to my cards as I've seen on this thread and other websites some video cards are just overclocked versions of the previous. Thus, no substantial gain is made without possibly destroying the card in the process. I'm going to add an external cooler to the Alien 18, but for now, this is the best score I can get when tinkering with GPU and Mem offsets.

 

[jboydgolfer]

Not sure what your saying,, You have linked a dead attachment that goes nowhere, while quoting comments of mine that are from when Shadowplay was broken, or corrupted..then you mention not increasing power on your card out of fear of damaging it ?? im not sure...i have no probblem increasing my cards voltage. if it broke , or needed replacing , i would replace it. thats just part of the risk. but i got performance increases on my Machine...it runs those over volted settings 24/7 just fine. if it broke, id return it, and put in the other 970 i have sitting here that the same company sent me for free. no skin off my back. thansk for the concern tho.

decent score too.

 

[scevism]

Just tried mine at 1920x1080 And comes back with this wtf?

 

[jboydgolfer]

You didnt check the box for fullscreen is my guess, but i suppose i could be wrong....theres a 1st time for everything

 

[scevism]

I'm running on a old 40'' sony lcd at 1360x768
Just done 1920x1080 fullscreen display was all washed out and over stretched and come back with this crap result ffs

 

[jboydgolfer]

that score doesnt seem indicative of that beast of a GPU, and CPU build You have...somethings not right there.
Hmmm, maybe your Nvidia control panel has something screwy going on, im REALLY new to Nvidia, ive been an AMD user for a long time, certainly not the guy to offer advice, but Your score should blow me out of the water, atleast id think it would...im certain you'll figure it out. I wonder if its the OS?

 

[scevism]

Dont get it im on win10 all games run great on max settings. I use Nvidia DSR on all games at 2720x1536.
All a bit strange.

 

[Vellinious]

Dont get it im on win10 all games run great on max settings. I use Nvidia DSR on all games at 2720x1536.
All a bit strange.

Take a screenshot of your NVIDIA control panel settings.

The power management should be set to "prefer maximum performance"
Texture filtering? I think that's in there, it should be on "performance"
There's also some tweaks you can do with image filtering.

Honestly though, even on stock settings, your card should be posting better scores than that on 1080.