Share your CPUZ Benchmarks!

[CAPSLOCKSTUCK]

Why do you have disabled hyper-threading?

I was playing GTA and my CPU was hitting 68 degrees. Ive been using it at stock since i broke my AIO but decided to set it @ 3.6ghz and turn H/T off to lower temps a bit.

As it happens ive got a stock cooler off a FX 8350 sitting on my chip at the moment.....its bloody loud.

Can you add your specs here please.
https://www.techpowerup.com/forums/account/specs

 

[cdawall]

@CAPSLOCKSTUCK
Thanks.
Why do you have disabled hyper-threading?

Sorry - my english is not good.
When FX reaches a temperature over 60 degrees under a load, the timing and the voltage drops. In this beta BIOS there is no option to disable this protection. Power section is not hot (is cooled). When I held unlocked and overclocked Phenom X2 to X4 is a drop timing is not happen.
I posted a screenshot for proof that the Asus 890GX chipset is possible stable operation of the processor FX 8350.
This is the maximum that can be achieved in terms of overclocking, at least for me.

890GX supports FX series parts, but the VRM sections are known to throttle due to the fact that they are not as strong as what you will find in the higher end 990FX stuff. They were only designed for the 6 core thuban based chips which consume a lot less power under load. Even if the PWM section is cool it does not mean it is not throttling due to wattage. The controller is smart enough to know it is over wattage.

 

[CAPSLOCKSTUCK]

Sorry folks but i like these comparisons.

@blysk

Heres my X5670 @ 4.5ghz h/t off

and heres yours cos its on a different page now and they are easier to compare like this.

Mine @ 4.5ghz h/t on

 

[blysk]

Thanks for reply cdawall
How do you think? Should I remove this FX and install Phenom X6 1100T to this mainboard?
I do not want change this mainboard.
AND I know thats INTEL CPU'S are better than AMD CPU'S

This is good comparison CAPSLOCKSTUCK.
From 6759 multi thread score to 10273 is a big difference.

 

[CAPSLOCKSTUCK]

AND I know thats INTEL CPU'S are better than AMD CPU'S

that wasnt the point of my comparison. The last build i completed (last weekend) was a Phenom ii and the one before that was a FX 8350 with GTX 970.

 

[cdawall]

Thanks for reply cdawall
How do you think? Should I remove this FX and install Phenom X6 1100T to this mainboard?
I do not want change this mainboard.
AND I know thats INTEL CPU'S are better than AMD CPU'S

This is good comparison CAPSLOCKSTUCK.
From 6759 multi thread score to 10273 is a big difference.

Just leave it be and upgrade the whole rig at once.

 

[blysk]

@cdawall
If I will have much more money I will do this, and many other things...
Thank you. I understand - Investing in this technology is wasting of money in my case.

CAPSLOCKSTUCK
FX 8350 and GTX 970?
You made computer with good perfomance for present games like witcher 3

 

[CAPSLOCKSTUCK]

It was for a friend, his brother chose the parts and he asked me to build it. He mainly plays modded Skyrim.

 

[redmaster]

Just registered here to show how the G3250 beats most of hi-Tech CPU-s in single-threaded operations, of course, overclocked
Got 4.4Ghz with stock Cooler, and 1.38v aaaaaand yes, on B85 Board

 

[EmbeddedGenius]

 

[Recon-UK]

Needs more flux capacitor.

 

[Recon-UK]

The 1366 XEON's.

Enthusiast driver behind the wheel =

 

[panther030]

Is this OK ?

 

[nomdeplume]

I've been averaging 1280 single thread and 4300 multi thread since I posted mine for some reason. If I bench a second time scores similar to yours show up. No ideas.

 

[Grings]

was at 4.8 but it needed 1.38v, this is at 1.33v

 

[er557]

Xeon FTW; nuff said...

 

[cdawall]

View attachment 80954

Xeon FTW; nuff said...

I'm so close to that with 8 cores lol

 

[er557]

stock man, stock ! i dont fry eggs on my 0.6v vcore , NOTHING is overclocked except some tweaks on the gpus

 

[cdawall]

stock man, stock ! i dont fry eggs on my 0.6v vcore , NOTHING is overclocked except some tweaks on the gpus

I was just impressed how close it was getting in the mutlithreading. I have a fancy Xeon as well, but it is only a 12 core for my plex server. I think turbo is broken on the ES chip however, it only seems to bump up to 2.4 in stead of the 2.9ghz it is spec'd for.

 

[er557]

That's any ES chip, they are all clocked /turbo lower than retail, and who knows what other feature may be incomplete. what i looked for was the QS stepping, which is same as retail spec/clock/feature/any other way, just marked qualification sample still(officially). hence price goes down, and bang for buck goes up

 

[cdawall]

That's any ES chip, they are all clocked /turbo lower than retail, and who knows what other feature may be incomplete. what i looked for was the QS stepping, which is same as retail spec/clock/feature/any other way, just marked qualification sample still(officially). hence price goes down, and bang for buck goes up

This was cheap enough that I am not really that worried about it. Good value and it stepped me into broadwell-e which clock for clock seems to hold its own against yours single cored

 

[watageek]

24/7, +0.125 offset vcore, pretty conservative @ 3.7Ghz HT ON
PROCHOT OFF

 

[CAPSLOCKSTUCK]

@watageek

For comparison X5670 @ 3.6 H/T off

 

[watageek]

@CAPSLOCKSTUCK

HT OFF

Roughly, only one Generation between the cpu...

 

[Recon-UK]

Same uarch, Westmere is just far more efficient.