INSTG8R
Vanguard Beta Tester
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2004
- Messages
- 8,081 (1.10/day)
- Location
- Canuck in Norway
System Name | Hellbox 5.1(same case new guts) |
---|---|
Processor | Ryzen 7 5800X3D |
Motherboard | MSI X570S MAG Torpedo Max |
Cooling | TT Kandalf L.C.S.(Water/Air)EK Velocity CPU Block/Noctua EK Quantum DDC Pump/Res |
Memory | 2x16GB Gskill Trident Neo Z 3600 CL16 |
Video Card(s) | Powercolor Hellhound 7900XTX |
Storage | 970 Evo Plus 500GB 2xSamsung 850 Evo 500GB RAID 0 1TB WD Blue Corsair MP600 Core 2TB |
Display(s) | Alienware QD-OLED 34” 3440x1440 144hz 10Bit VESA HDR 400 |
Case | TT Kandalf L.C.S. |
Audio Device(s) | Soundblaster ZX/Logitech Z906 5.1 |
Power Supply | Seasonic TX~’850 Platinum |
Mouse | G502 Hero |
Keyboard | G19s |
VR HMD | Oculus Quest 3 |
Software | Win 11 Pro x64 |
Exactly you need to have an be within your actual range for it to work. On AMD the ideal setup is running both Enhanced Sync with Freesync so Enhanced cover when it goes outside of the Freesync range making the transitions between the two seamless for your case for example allowing that kind of extremes without any penalty in theory. I’m still sceptical of it but I’ve been assured by AMD this is the ideal setup. I’m still waiting for someone combine Fast Sync and VRR to see if that combo produces the same results.But that's the only way it feels "bearable". If capped at 60, I get even worse performance comparing to regular VSync (I'm talking about stuttering on the monitor, not PC lagging).
Constant frame jumping and image distortion.
Before this update I was using fastsync, which gives best of both worlds with less performance impact. I guess I'll have to stick with that until I get a proper 144Hz 4K in about 4-5 years
Last edited: