- Joined
- Nov 27, 2010
- Messages
- 924 (0.18/day)
System Name | future xeon II |
---|---|
Processor | DUAL SOCKET xeon e5 2686 v3 , 36c/72t, hacked all cores @3.5ghz, TDP limit hacked |
Motherboard | asrock rack ep2c612 ws |
Cooling | case fans,liquid corsair h100iv2 x2 |
Memory | 96 gb ddr4 2133mhz gskill+corsair |
Video Card(s) | 2x 1080 sc acx3 SLI, @STOCK |
Storage | Hp ex950 2tb nvme+ adata xpg sx8200 pro 1tb nvme+ sata ssd's+ spinners |
Display(s) | philips 40" bdm4065uc 4k @60 |
Case | silverstone temjin tj07-b |
Audio Device(s) | sb Z |
Power Supply | corsair hx1200i |
Mouse | corsair m95 16 buttons |
Keyboard | microsoft internet keyboard pro |
Software | windows 10 x64 1903 ,enterprise |
Benchmark Scores | fire strike ultra- 10k time spy- 15k cpu z- 400/15000 |
@FCG :
I see that you are using the turbo hack, mind you that older microcodes with TSX are less stable, though do turbo higher. You seem to not run undervolted, as you upped the bclk to 105, do check stability in the long term, also to avoid other devices hurting from the bclk, you may use an undervolt efi to gain same performance without bclk raising.
Can you share the efi version you are using, also the microcode revision and are you meltdown protected.
I see that you are using the turbo hack, mind you that older microcodes with TSX are less stable, though do turbo higher. You seem to not run undervolted, as you upped the bclk to 105, do check stability in the long term, also to avoid other devices hurting from the bclk, you may use an undervolt efi to gain same performance without bclk raising.
Can you share the efi version you are using, also the microcode revision and are you meltdown protected.