I wanna say that When GTX 1050 Ti released in 2016, it's price was 140 Dollars. RX 470 costed 180 Dollars and it only pass %30 GTX 1050 Ti. GTX 1050 Ti is only 75W. Well, how much power RX 470 spends?
R9 390X-390=RX 580 for 2 years. I think that Nvidia defeats AMD. GTX 980 is same with GTX 1060 6GB.
AMD builts Ryzen for 4 years because of the fact that Jim Keller helps AMD and he left AMD. So what will we see in 2021?
In the same way, Raja koduri left AMD. I don't expect these GPUs are as good as RTX 2070 for 330 Dollars. Maybe it will same with GTX 1660 Ti(RX3080 non XT).
Why do you defend AMD?
Everyone is right for Nvidia's pricing method. I think that GTX 1650 should costs 130 Dollars.
Jim Keller never stays with one company for very long. He's hired to help design CPU Micro-Architectures, then moves on.
What Jim Keller did for AMD is not only assist with the ZEN Design, but also had a hand in the CPU Design after ZEN 4's completion in 2021 or so. Basically he's set AMD up for several years in advance.
He will do the same for Intel, then move onto other ventures or simply retire.
It took AMD about 5 years to design and launch ZEN. In 2015 AMD started development on a New GPU Design, built from the ground up. That GPU should be available sometime in 2020, though depending on how well Navi performs as a last GCN based effort, AMD may as well push the new GPU Design to 2021 to further enhance the architecture. D
With Dr. Lisa Su leading AMD, the success of ZEN I am confident Navi will impress just enough to satisfy the average gamer, all while they prepare the brand new gpu.
MEH... multi-GPU has lost its luster and has been losing favor for what seems like years now. Scaling isn't always there, double the power, double the heat, double the price... unless you cannot reach the FPS you want, single card is the way to go.
As much as I would like to disagree, I cannot lol
Perhaps one day Games will take better multi Core advantage.