• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Announces the CDNA and CDNA2 Compute GPU Architectures

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,311 (7.52/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
AMD at its 2020 Financial Analyst Day event unveiled its upcoming CDNA GPU-based compute accelerator architecture. CDNA will complement the company's graphics-oriented RDNA architecture. While RDNA powers the company's Radeon Pro and Radeon RX client- and enterprise graphics products, CDNA will power compute accelerators such as Radeon Instinct, etc. AMD is having to fork its graphics IP to RDNA and CDNA due to what it described as market-based product differentiation.

Data centers and HPCs using Radeon Instinct accelerators have no use for the GPU's actual graphics rendering capabilities. And so, at a silicon level, AMD is removing the raster graphics hardware, the display and multimedia engines, and other associated components that otherwise take up significant amounts of die area. In their place, AMD is adding fixed-function tensor compute hardware, similar to the tensor cores on certain NVIDIA GPUs.



AMD also talked about giving its compute GPUs advanced HBM2e memory interfaces, Infinity Fabric interconnect in addition to PCIe, etc. The company detailed a brief roadmap of CDNA looking as far into the future as 2021-22. The company's current-generation compute accelerators are based on the dated "Vega" architectures, and are essentially reconfigured "Vega 20" GPUs that lack tensor hardware.

Later this year, the company will introduce its first CDNA GPU based on "7 nm" process, compute unit IPC rivaling RDNA, and tensor hardware that accelerates AI DNN building and training.

Somewhere between 2021 and 2022, AMD will introduce its updated CDNA2 architecture based on an "advanced process" that AMD hasn't finalized yet. The company is fairly confident that "Zen4" CPU microarchitecture will leverage 5 nm, but hasn't been clear about the same for CDNA2 (both launch around the same time). Besides ramping up IPC, compute units, and other things, the design focus with CDNA2 will be hyper-scalability (the ability to scale GPUs across vast memory pools spanning thousands of nodes). AMD will leverage its 3rd generation Infinity Fabric interconnect and cache-coherent unified memory to accomplish this.

Much like Intel's Compute eXpress Link (CXL) and PCI-Express gen 5.0, Infinity Fabric 3.0 will support shared memory pools between CPUs and GPUs, enabling scalability of the kind required by exascale supercomputers such as the US-DoE's upcoming "El Capitan" and "Frontier." Cache coherent unified memory reduces unnecessary data-transfers between the CPU-attached DRAM memory and the GPU-attached HBM. CPU cores will be able to directly process various serial-compute stages of a GPU compute operation by directly talking to the GPU-attached HBM and not pulling data to its own main memory. This greatly reduces I/O stress. "El Capitan" is an "all-AMD" supercomputer with up to 2 exaflops (that's 2,000 petaflops or 2 million TFLOPs) peak throughput. It combines AMD EPYC "Genoa" CPUs based on the "Zen4" microarchitecture, with GPUs likely based on CDNA2, and Infinity Fabric 3.0 handling I/O.

Oh the software side of things, AMD's latest ROCm open-source software infrastructure will bring CDNA and CPUs together, by providing a unified programming model rivaling Intel's OneAPI and NVIDIA CUDA. A platform-agnostic API compatible with any GPU will be combined with a CUDA to HIP translation layer.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
7,564 (1.77/day)
AMD haven't specified which version of 7nm they'll use or if they'll even use 7nm EUV at all, btw TSMC 7nm has 3 variants.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2005
Messages
5,847 (0.81/day)
Location
Ikenai borderline!
System Name Firelance.
Processor Threadripper 3960X
Motherboard ROG Strix TRX40-E Gaming
Cooling IceGem 360 + 6x Arctic Cooling P12
Memory 8x 16GB Patriot Viper DDR4-3200 CL16
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Ventus 2X OC
Storage 2TB WD SN850X (boot), 4TB Crucial P3 (data)
Display(s) 3x AOC Q32E2N (32" 2560x1440 75Hz)
Case Enthoo Pro II Server Edition (Closed Panel) + 6 fans
Power Supply Fractal Design Ion+ 2 Platinum 760W
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Razer Pro Type Ultra
Software Windows 10 Professional x64
When NVIDIA did it, the cry from the red fanboys was "ngreedia is ripping you off!!!!!!111one". I very much look forward to seeing the mental gymnastics they'll put themselves through to justify "their" team doing the same.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
7,564 (1.77/day)
Doing what exactly? Nvidia, besides being rightly slapped with multiple class action lawsuits over the GTX 970, was involved with screw-gate, BIOS (drivers?) updates killing GPUs, then killing OCing on notebook(?) GPU but then backtracking after user backlash among many others. You really have to be "specific" what you think AMD will do to screw their user base!
 
Joined
Nov 24, 2017
Messages
853 (0.33/day)
Location
Asia
Processor Intel Core i5 4590
Motherboard Gigabyte Z97x Gaming 3
Cooling Intel Stock Cooler
Memory 8GiB(2x4GiB) DDR3-1600 [800MHz]
Video Card(s) XFX RX 560D 4GiB
Storage Transcend SSD370S 128GB; Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB HDD
Display(s) Samsung S20D300 20" 768p TN
Case Cooler Master MasterBox E501L
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150
Power Supply Corsair VS450
Mouse A4Tech N-70FX
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores BaseMark GPU : 250 Point in HD 4600
Doing what exactly? Nvidia, besides being rightly slapped with multiple class action lawsuits over the GTX 970, was involved with screw-gate, BIOS (drivers?) updates killing GPUs, then killing OCing on notebook(?) GPU but then backtracking after user backlash among many others. You really have to be "specific" what you think AMD will do to screw their user base!
What problem you are talking about?? Aren't those are AMD's problem??
/s
 

Frick

Fishfaced Nincompoop
Joined
Feb 27, 2006
Messages
19,689 (2.86/day)
Location
w
System Name Black MC in Tokyo
Processor Ryzen 5 7600
Motherboard MSI X670E Gaming Plus Wifi
Cooling Be Quiet! Pure Rock 2
Memory 2 x 16GB Corsair Vengeance @ 6000Mhz
Video Card(s) XFX 6950XT Speedster MERC 319
Storage Kingston KC3000 1TB | WD Black SN750 2TB |WD Blue 1TB x 2 | Toshiba P300 2TB | Seagate Expansion 8TB
Display(s) Samsung U32J590U 4K + BenQ GL2450HT 1080p
Case Fractal Design Define R4
Audio Device(s) Plantronics 5220, Nektar SE61 keyboard
Power Supply Corsair RM850x v3
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Dell SK3205
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores Rimworld 4K ready!
When NVIDIA did it, the cry from the red fanboys was "ngreedia is ripping you off!!!!!!111one". I very much look forward to seeing the mental gymnastics they'll put themselves through to justify "their" team doing the same.

Why would anyone say that?
 
Joined
Jul 9, 2015
Messages
3,413 (0.99/day)
System Name M3401 notebook
Processor 5600H
Motherboard NA
Memory 16GB
Video Card(s) 3050
Storage 500GB SSD
Display(s) 14" OLED screen of the laptop
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores 3050 scores good 15-20% lower than average, despite ASUS's claims that it has uber cooling.
AMD haven't specified which version of 7nm they'll use or if they'll even use 7nm EUV at all, btw TSMC 7nm has 3 variants.
7N and 7NP are compatible.
7N+, on the other hand, looks like a waste, if what TSMC is promisnig about 5nm is true.

When NVIDIA did it, the cry from the red fanboys was "ngreedia is ripping you off!!!!!!111one". I very much look forward to seeing the mental gymnastics they'll put themselves through to justify "their" team doing the same.
I thought AMD having enough money to have separate line of compute oriented products was good news for gamers.
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
26,259 (4.43/day)
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2021
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (65w eco profile)
Motherboard MSI B550 Gaming Plus
Cooling Scythe Mugen (rev 5)
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-3200 32 GiB
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Storage Samsung 980 Pro, Seagate Exos X20 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Nixeus NX-EDG274K (3840x2160@144 DP) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW (1440x900@60 HDMI-DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay + USB 3.2 (A+C) 3.5" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse Nixeus REVEL-X
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
I wonder if CDNA is a rebrand of GCN with render hardware chopped off and some features (like Infinity Fabric between GPUs) added.
 
Joined
Jun 18, 2015
Messages
349 (0.10/day)
Location
Perth , West Australia
System Name schweinestalle
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 3700 X
Motherboard Asus Prime - Pro X 570 + Asus PCI -E AC68 Dual Band Wi-Fi Adapter
Cooling Standard Air
Memory Kingston HyperX 2 x 16 gb DDR 4 3200mhz
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon 5700 XT 8 GB Strix
Storage Intel SSD 240 gb Speed Demon & WD 240 SSD Blue & WD 250 SSD & WD Green 500gb SSD & Seagate 1 TB Sata
Display(s) Asus XG 32 V ROG
Case Corsair AIR ATX
Audio Device(s) Realtech standard
Power Supply Corsair 850 Modular
Mouse CM Havoc
Keyboard Corsair Cherry Mechanical
Software Win 10
Benchmark Scores Unigine_Superposition 4K ultra 7582
Isnt it good for AMD to win a contract like this ??? Arnt they a US company ….WhO gives A damn about fanbois .
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
3,430 (0.83/day)
Location
Athens, Greece
System Name 3 desktop systems: Gaming / Internet / HTPC
Processor Ryzen 5 7600 / Ryzen 5 4600G / Ryzen 5 5500
Motherboard X670E Gaming Plus WiFi / MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (1) / MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (2)
Cooling Aigo ICE 400SE / Segotep T4 / Νoctua U12S
Memory Kingston FURY Beast 32GB DDR5 6000 / 16GB JUHOR / 32GB G.Skill RIPJAWS 3600 + Aegis 3200
Video Card(s) ASRock RX 6600 / Vega 7 integrated / Radeon RX 580
Storage NVMes, ONLY NVMes / NVMes, SATA Storage / NVMe, SATA, external storage
Display(s) Philips 43PUS8857/12 UHD TV (120Hz, HDR, FreeSync Premium) / 19'' HP monitor + BlitzWolf BW-V5
Case Sharkoon Rebel 12 / CoolerMaster Elite 361 / Xigmatek Midguard
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Chieftec 850W / Silver Power 400W / Sharkoon 650W
Mouse CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / CoolerMaster Devastator / Logitech
Keyboard CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / CoolerMaster Devastator / Logitech
Software Windows 10 / Windows 10&Windows 11 / Windows 10
When NVIDIA did it, the cry from the red fanboys was "ngreedia is ripping you off!!!!!!111one". I very much look forward to seeing the mental gymnastics they'll put themselves through to justify "their" team doing the same.

It must be a great feeling when there is ONCE in a lifetime the chance to imagine, just imagine, another company coming close to Nvidia's greediness(well, close as looking from a telescope).
 
Joined
Jul 9, 2015
Messages
3,413 (0.99/day)
System Name M3401 notebook
Processor 5600H
Motherboard NA
Memory 16GB
Video Card(s) 3050
Storage 500GB SSD
Display(s) 14" OLED screen of the laptop
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores 3050 scores good 15-20% lower than average, despite ASUS's claims that it has uber cooling.
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
9,521 (3.27/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R9 7900 - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Edge
Motherboard ASRock B650 Pro RS
Cooling 2x 360mm NexXxoS ST30 X-Flow, 1x 360mm NexXxoS ST30, 1x 240mm NexXxoS ST30
Memory 32GB - FURY Beast RGB 5600 Mhz
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 7900 XT - Alphacool Eisblock Aurora
Storage 1x Kingston KC3000 1TB 1x Kingston A2000 1TB, 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) LG UltraGear 32GN650-B + 4K Samsung TV
Case Phanteks NV7
Power Supply GPS-750C
When NVIDIA did it

Genuinely have no clue what you are talking about. This a first as far as I know and it's product that will never reach the hands of the average consumer.

I wonder if CDNA is a rebrand of GCN

Not a rebrand but probably an evolution of GCN, I doubt they can add in those tensor units without revamping the architecture in some way. That being said cutting all raster hardware is going to save a considerable amount of space.
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
11,878 (2.20/day)
Location
Manchester uk
System Name RyzenGtEvo/ Asus strix scar II
Processor Amd R5 5900X/ Intel 8750H
Motherboard Crosshair hero8 impact/Asus
Cooling 360EK extreme rad+ 360$EK slim all push, cpu ek suprim Gpu full cover all EK
Memory Corsair Vengeance Rgb pro 3600cas14 16Gb in four sticks./16Gb/16GB
Video Card(s) Powercolour RX7900XT Reference/Rtx 2060
Storage Silicon power 2TB nvme/8Tb external/1Tb samsung Evo nvme 2Tb sata ssd/1Tb nvme
Display(s) Samsung UAE28"850R 4k freesync.dell shiter
Case Lianli 011 dynamic/strix scar2
Audio Device(s) Xfi creative 7.1 on board ,Yamaha dts av setup, corsair void pro headset
Power Supply corsair 1200Hxi/Asus stock
Mouse Roccat Kova/ Logitech G wireless
Keyboard Roccat Aimo 120
VR HMD Oculus rift
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 8726 vega 3dmark timespy/ laptop Timespy 6506
When NVIDIA did it, the cry from the red fanboys was "ngreedia is ripping you off!!!!!!111one". I very much look forward to seeing the mental gymnastics they'll put themselves through to justify "their" team doing the same.
Wondering what your on about?.


Did what?
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
11,878 (2.20/day)
Location
Manchester uk
System Name RyzenGtEvo/ Asus strix scar II
Processor Amd R5 5900X/ Intel 8750H
Motherboard Crosshair hero8 impact/Asus
Cooling 360EK extreme rad+ 360$EK slim all push, cpu ek suprim Gpu full cover all EK
Memory Corsair Vengeance Rgb pro 3600cas14 16Gb in four sticks./16Gb/16GB
Video Card(s) Powercolour RX7900XT Reference/Rtx 2060
Storage Silicon power 2TB nvme/8Tb external/1Tb samsung Evo nvme 2Tb sata ssd/1Tb nvme
Display(s) Samsung UAE28"850R 4k freesync.dell shiter
Case Lianli 011 dynamic/strix scar2
Audio Device(s) Xfi creative 7.1 on board ,Yamaha dts av setup, corsair void pro headset
Power Supply corsair 1200Hxi/Asus stock
Mouse Roccat Kova/ Logitech G wireless
Keyboard Roccat Aimo 120
VR HMD Oculus rift
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 8726 vega 3dmark timespy/ laptop Timespy 6506
He is one of the derail squad who sent ocn into the abyss. Exhibits like these normally frame you into a troll stereotype and try to maintain the upperhand in playing tag.
So random though.


Looking forward though consider, Any benchmark or rumour on a video output enabled big Navi is not CDNA.


Spec sheet rumours could be either too.
 
Joined
Jun 3, 2010
Messages
2,540 (0.48/day)
Looking forward though consider, Any benchmark or rumour on a video output enabled big Navi is not CDNA.
Correct. Display versions are rapid packed math enabled all the while compute versions are tensor enabled. I wonder how good they work in exercise. They have Timothy Lottes as a superpower at every turn. Navi had compiler optimisations to improve opcode traffic. I wonder how far these can do the same. After all, aren't tensors about bigger vector flows to reduce opcode traffic? All to the extent of scalarization imo.
 
Joined
Aug 8, 2019
Messages
430 (0.22/day)
System Name R2V2 *In Progress
Processor Ryzen 7 2700
Motherboard Asrock X570 Taichi
Cooling W2A... water to air
Memory G.Skill Trident Z3466 B-die
Video Card(s) Radeon VII repaired and resurrected
Storage Adata and Samsung NVME
Display(s) Samsung LCD
Case Some ThermalTake
Audio Device(s) Asus Strix RAID DLX upgraded op amps
Power Supply Seasonic Prime something or other
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
When NVIDIA did it, the cry from the red fanboys was "ngreedia is ripping you off!!!!!!111one". I very much look forward to seeing the mental gymnastics they'll put themselves through to justify "their" team doing the same.

I got in trouble for making a similar post hammering NV fanboys.

Key differences...

NV locks you into an eco system. AMD hasn't made a CUDA or done everything they can to force you to only use Radeons for things like 'Physx' and threatened to sue people who dare to undo their locks.

AMD is actually trying to make this easy to use and support open standards while trying to ease the pain of moving from the green tax team.

I also very muchly doubt we'll see the end of products like the Vega 2s, because there's a purpose for render/compute beast cards.

Though who knows, Quadros are nothing but really expensive GeForce cards with 'pro' drivers in most cases.

AMD on the other hand lets you use their Pro drivers on their normal Radeons. The difference is the real pro cards tend to have better FP64 dividers.

Sooooo...

How's AMD being greedy again?
 

Cheeseball

Not a Potato
Supporter
Joined
Jan 2, 2009
Messages
2,057 (0.35/day)
Location
Pittsburgh, PA
System Name Titan
Processor AMD Ryzen™ 7 7950X3D
Motherboard ASRock X870 Taichi Lite
Cooling Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 EVO CPU
Memory TEAMGROUP T-Force Delta RGB 2x16GB DDR5-6000 CL30
Video Card(s) ASRock Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24 GB GDDR6 (MBA)
Storage Crucial T500 2TB x 3
Display(s) LG 32GS95UE-B, ASUS ROG Swift OLED (PG27AQDP), LG C4 42" (OLED42C4PUA)
Case Cooler Master QUBE 500 Flatpack Macaron
Audio Device(s) Kanto Audio YU2 and SUB8 Desktop Speakers and Subwoofer, Cloud Alpha Wireless
Power Supply Corsair SF1000
Mouse Logitech Pro Superlight 2 (White), G303 Shroud Edition
Keyboard Keychron K2 HE Wireless / 8BitDo Retro Mechanical Keyboard (N Edition) / NuPhy Air75 v2
VR HMD Meta Quest 3 512GB
Software Windows 11 Pro 64-bit 24H2 Build 26100.2605
Guys... :shadedshu:

Oh the software side of things, AMD's latest ROCm open-source software infrastructure will bring CDNA and CPUs together, by providing a unified programming model rivaling Intel's OneAPI and NVIDIA CUDA. A platform-agnostic API compatible with any GPU will be combined with a CUDA to HIP translation layer.

CUDA is technically an open-source framework. It is basically C++ code and can run on any GPGPU, however there are extensions that are optimized for NVIDIA hardware to use them. There are also compilers (cuDNN and NVCC) which are optimized for NVIDIA hardware. This is where the advantage of CUDA lies and why its one of the superior solutions at the moment.

ROCm is also an open-source framework. It is also C++ code that can run on any hardware too. There are some AMD-only extensions that are specific to GCN5 (and RDNA as of 3.0 now) but they are mostly raw OpenCL, which can be run on NVIDIA GPUs, Intel IGPs and even x86/ARM CPUs using standard LLVM compilers. They are also Metal (Apple) compatible, considering that Macs are using AMD GPUs for the Pro products.

Whats the problem? There isn't any! What it is is that it's more of a limitation because coding pure (without extensions and optimizations) OpenCL is not as robust as CUDA on NVIDIA GPGPUs. It's great for initial learning and early development, but eventually once you get to optimization, you'd want a framework that can handle complex loads and support for optimizing further.

HIP makes it easy to use CUDA, HC, OpenCL, etc. code as it translates quite cleanly. So any code compiled with HIP enabled (using HCC on AMD, NVCC on NVIDIA) will work on any GPGPU.

NVIDIA has not made CUDA proprietary. It is only a "walled garden" because CUDA-optimized code runs better on NVIDIA hardware, and this is obviously sensible. If you translate CUDA code using HIP, you can run it on AMD GPUGPUs, but don't expect it to be optimized since the underlying architecture is different. OpenCL runs fine on any hardware, hence being open, only being limited by the hardware.
 
Joined
Aug 8, 2019
Messages
430 (0.22/day)
System Name R2V2 *In Progress
Processor Ryzen 7 2700
Motherboard Asrock X570 Taichi
Cooling W2A... water to air
Memory G.Skill Trident Z3466 B-die
Video Card(s) Radeon VII repaired and resurrected
Storage Adata and Samsung NVME
Display(s) Samsung LCD
Case Some ThermalTake
Audio Device(s) Asus Strix RAID DLX upgraded op amps
Power Supply Seasonic Prime something or other
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Guys... :shadedshu:



CUDA is technically an open-source framework. It is basically C++ code and can run on any GPGPU, however there are extensions that are optimized for NVIDIA hardware to use them. There are also compilers (cuDNN and NVCC) which are optimized for NVIDIA hardware. This is where the advantage of CUDA lies and why its one of the superior solutions at the moment.

ROCm is also an open-source framework. It is also C++ code that can run on any hardware too. There are some AMD-only extensions that are specific to GCN5 (and RDNA as of 3.0 now) but they are mostly raw OpenCL, which can be run on NVIDIA GPUs, Intel IGPs and even x86/ARM CPUs using standard LLVM compilers. They are also Metal (Apple) compatible, considering that Macs are using AMD GPUs for the Pro products.

Whats the problem? There isn't any! What it is is that it's more of a limitation because coding pure (without extensions and optimizations) OpenCL is not as robust as CUDA on NVIDIA GPGPUs. It's great for initial learning and early development, but eventually once you get to optimization, you'd want a framework that can handle complex loads and support for optimizing further.

HIP makes it easy to use CUDA, HC, OpenCL, etc. code as it translates quite cleanly. So any code compiled with HIP enabled (using HCC on AMD, NVCC on NVIDIA) will work on any GPGPU.

NVIDIA has not made CUDA proprietary. It is only a "walled garden" because CUDA-optimized code runs better on NVIDIA hardware, and this is obviously sensible. If you translate CUDA code using HIP, you can run it on AMD GPUGPUs, but don't expect it to be optimized since the underlying architecture is different. OpenCL runs fine on any hardware, hence being open, only being limited by the hardware.

We gets it Cheeseball, you will defend NV to your dying breath.

I actually went digging. AMD can only partially emulate some CUDA code. They can only do it on Linux. They are also versions behind.

NV did offer an emulator for a bit, but then killed it and locked the CUDA dev tools to only run on certified hardware.

If AMD ever did try to actually license CUDA, NV would have to change the license. You require Nvidia hardware, you require Nvidia drivers, and God help you if you try to modify their software.

So basically AMD can't even look at CUDA while trying to port it.

Open and free as long as you only use our hardware. Oh you could use OpenCL but it's badly supported and very limited, but here use our 'Free' and superior 'open' alternative.

Saying it's not a walled garden is like saying OSX isn't because it's based on FreeBSD. Apple keeps making it harder and harder to run on non-Apple hardware.

NV has a stack of clauses forbidding people from reverse engineering anything they provide in terms of CUDA or it's required software it seems.

Just because people have managed to hack support for some CUDA calls to work in OpenCL or One API, doesn't mean it's open. Oh and you are completely screwed on Windows.

This is what I gathered in a few minutes of Google searches.

Nvidia won't even let you decompile the CUDA stuff on Linux. The license actually says you are only allowed to decompress the downloaded file, and distribute the unzipped contents. Any other modification or tampering or unpacking will be viewed most dimly.

So it's impressive that people have managed to get any CUDA porting to work. Though I'm sure if NV could prove that they looked at actual CUDA stuff they'd sue their asses into non-existance.

Edit: from what I gathered...

ROCm is an attempt by AMD to emulate CUDA hardware.

HIPM is software that translates CUDA code into OpenCL code.

Neither offers full support for even older versions of CUDA and they don't support the latest versions at all.

Also no CUDA emulators on Windows or NV will sue you into bankruptcy. Guess they really don't want PhysX on anything but NV hardware that is also rendering. No slave NV GPUs with Radeons doing the drawing.

Open like iOS... LoL
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 4, 2017
Messages
36 (0.01/day)
Location
Melbourne
Watching the NVIDIA/AMD fanbois fight it out is hilarious and entertaining.

Hot tip: never listen to fanbois. They have no real information due to their inherent cognitive bias.

Guys... :shadedshu:



CUDA is technically an open-source framework. It is basically C++ code and can run on any GPGPU, however there are extensions that are optimized for NVIDIA hardware to use them. There are also compilers (cuDNN and NVCC) which are optimized for NVIDIA hardware. This is where the advantage of CUDA lies and why its one of the superior solutions at the moment.

ROCm is also an open-source framework. It is also C++ code that can run on any hardware too. There are some AMD-only extensions that are specific to GCN5 (and RDNA as of 3.0 now) but they are mostly raw OpenCL, which can be run on NVIDIA GPUs, Intel IGPs and even x86/ARM CPUs using standard LLVM compilers. They are also Metal (Apple) compatible, considering that Macs are using AMD GPUs for the Pro products.

Whats the problem? There isn't any! What it is is that it's more of a limitation because coding pure (without extensions and optimizations) OpenCL is not as robust as CUDA on NVIDIA GPGPUs. It's great for initial learning and early development, but eventually once you get to optimization, you'd want a framework that can handle complex loads and support for optimizing further.

HIP makes it easy to use CUDA, HC, OpenCL, etc. code as it translates quite cleanly. So any code compiled with HIP enabled (using HCC on AMD, NVCC on NVIDIA) will work on any GPGPU.

NVIDIA has not made CUDA proprietary. It is only a "walled garden" because CUDA-optimized code runs better on NVIDIA hardware, and this is obviously sensible. If you translate CUDA code using HIP, you can run it on AMD GPUGPUs, but don't expect it to be optimized since the underlying architecture is different. OpenCL runs fine on any hardware, hence being open, only being limited by the hardware.

Wow that is plain uninformed, if not disingenuous.
 

Cheeseball

Not a Potato
Supporter
Joined
Jan 2, 2009
Messages
2,057 (0.35/day)
Location
Pittsburgh, PA
System Name Titan
Processor AMD Ryzen™ 7 7950X3D
Motherboard ASRock X870 Taichi Lite
Cooling Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 EVO CPU
Memory TEAMGROUP T-Force Delta RGB 2x16GB DDR5-6000 CL30
Video Card(s) ASRock Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24 GB GDDR6 (MBA)
Storage Crucial T500 2TB x 3
Display(s) LG 32GS95UE-B, ASUS ROG Swift OLED (PG27AQDP), LG C4 42" (OLED42C4PUA)
Case Cooler Master QUBE 500 Flatpack Macaron
Audio Device(s) Kanto Audio YU2 and SUB8 Desktop Speakers and Subwoofer, Cloud Alpha Wireless
Power Supply Corsair SF1000
Mouse Logitech Pro Superlight 2 (White), G303 Shroud Edition
Keyboard Keychron K2 HE Wireless / 8BitDo Retro Mechanical Keyboard (N Edition) / NuPhy Air75 v2
VR HMD Meta Quest 3 512GB
Software Windows 11 Pro 64-bit 24H2 Build 26100.2605
Watching the NVIDIA/AMD fanbois fight it out is hilarious and entertaining.

Hot tip: never listen to fanbois. They have no real information due to their inherent cognitive bias.



Wow that is plain uninformed, if not disingenuous.

Uninformed? What part of what I said is wrong? :laugh:

We gets it Cheeseball, you will defend NV to your dying breath.

I actually went digging. AMD can only partially emulate some CUDA code. They can only do it on Linux. They are also versions behind.

NV did offer an emulator for a bit, but then killed it and locked the CUDA dev tools to only run on certified hardware.

If AMD ever did try to actually license CUDA, NV would have to change the license. You require Nvidia hardware, you require Nvidia drivers, and God help you if you try to modify their software.

So basically AMD can't even look at CUDA while trying to port it.

Open and free as long as you only use our hardware. Oh you could use OpenCL but it's badly supported and very limited, but here use our 'Free' and superior 'open' alternative.

Saying it's not a walled garden is like saying OSX isn't because it's based on FreeBSD. Apple keeps making it harder and harder to run on non-Apple hardware.

NV has a stack of clauses forbidding people from reverse engineering anything they provide in terms of CUDA or it's required software it seems.

Just because people have managed to hack support for some CUDA calls to work in OpenCL or One API, doesn't mean it's open. Oh and you are completely screwed on Windows.

This is what I gathered in a few minutes of Google searches.

Nvidia won't even let you decompile the CUDA stuff on Linux. The license actually says you are only allowed to decompress the downloaded file, and distribute the unzipped contents. Any other modification or tampering or unpacking will be viewed most dimly.

So it's impressive that people have managed to get any CUDA porting to work. Though I'm sure if NV could prove that they looked at actual CUDA stuff they'd sue their asses into non-existance.

Edit: from what I gathered...

ROCm is an attempt by AMD to emulate CUDA hardware.

HIPM is software that translates CUDA code into OpenCL code.

Neither offers full support for even older versions of CUDA and they don't support the latest versions at all.

Also no CUDA emulators on Windows or NV will sue you into bankruptcy. Guess they really don't want PhysX on anything but NV hardware that is also rendering. No slave NV GPUs with Radeons doing the drawing.

Open like iOS... LoL

You technically agreed with me with everything you wrote here. The majority of projects using CUDA today are not on 7.5 and under (which is when it was still mostly proprietary), as that would be inefficient.

CUDA was locked down prior to 2012 and could only run on NVIDIA GPGPUs as there was practically no competition. OpenCL at the time (1.2) was not as useful for compute until 2.0 (due to C11 and piping support). This is why CUDA has a lead in deep learning implementation today.

OpenCL is definitely not badly supported by NVIDIA. In fact most implementations of it run fine on both NVIDIA and AMD GPGPUs. It's just that implementations that use CUDA code have a specific use case and have proven to be more efficient than trying to implement it in vanilla OpenCL.

Are you arguing about open-source solutions or the superiority of one API over another? Because despite CUDA being proprietary (in terms of hardware efficiency), NVIDIA hasn't done anything wrong since it is their product.

ROCm is a very new (as in less than 2 years old) framework that I very much want to succeed, but direct support (from AMD) is lacking. This is expected as it is an open-source solution and AMD is a smaller company that most likely doesn't have enough resources to send help out. This is where NVIDIA (and Intel apparently) shines. Hopefully the funding from the US DOE will accelerate its development as a viable framework.
 

eidairaman1

The Exiled Airman
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
42,770 (6.69/day)
Location
Republic of Texas (True Patriot)
System Name PCGOD
Processor AMD FX 8350@ 5.0GHz
Motherboard Asus TUF 990FX Sabertooth R2 2901 Bios
Cooling Scythe Ashura, 2×BitFenix 230mm Spectre Pro LED (Blue,Green), 2x BitFenix 140mm Spectre Pro LED
Memory 16 GB Gskill Ripjaws X 2133 (2400 OC, 10-10-12-20-20, 1T, 1.65V)
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon 290 Sapphire Vapor-X
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, WD Velociraptor 1TB
Display(s) NEC Multisync LCD 1700V (Display Port Adapter)
Case AeroCool Xpredator Evil Blue Edition
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Seasonic 1250 XM2 Series (XP3)
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD
Keyboard Roccat Ryos MK Pro
Software Windows 7 Pro 64
I got in trouble for making a similar post hammering NV fanboys.

Key differences...

NV locks you into an eco system. AMD hasn't made a CUDA or done everything they can to force you to only use Radeons for things like 'Physx' and threatened to sue people who dare to undo their locks.

AMD is actually trying to make this easy to use and support open standards while trying to ease the pain of moving from the green tax team.

I also very muchly doubt we'll see the end of products like the Vega 2s, because there's a purpose for render/compute beast cards.

Though who knows, Quadros are nothing but really expensive GeForce cards with 'pro' drivers in most cases.

AMD on the other hand lets you use their Pro drivers on their normal Radeons. The difference is the real pro cards tend to have better FP64 dividers.

Sooooo...

How's AMD being greedy again?

Pro drivers can be used on HD 7000 series

Dedicated hardware vs a jack all trades and a master of none. Makes more sense.
 
Joined
Aug 8, 2019
Messages
430 (0.22/day)
System Name R2V2 *In Progress
Processor Ryzen 7 2700
Motherboard Asrock X570 Taichi
Cooling W2A... water to air
Memory G.Skill Trident Z3466 B-die
Video Card(s) Radeon VII repaired and resurrected
Storage Adata and Samsung NVME
Display(s) Samsung LCD
Case Some ThermalTake
Audio Device(s) Asus Strix RAID DLX upgraded op amps
Power Supply Seasonic Prime something or other
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Pro drivers can be used on HD 7000 series

Dedicated hardware vs a jack all trades and a master of none. Makes more sense.

I installed the Pro drivers on a RX 560.

Seems they are available for all GCN cards. Which is really kind of cool. Those certified drivers aren't cheap to produce and have certified.
 
Joined
Jul 16, 2014
Messages
8,220 (2.15/day)
Location
SE Michigan
System Name Dumbass
Processor AMD Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard ASUS TUF gaming B650
Cooling Artic Liquid Freezer 2 - 420mm
Memory G.Skill Sniper 32gb DDR5 6000
Video Card(s) GreenTeam 4070 ti super 16gb
Storage Samsung EVO 500gb & 1Tb, 2tb HDD, 500gb WD Black
Display(s) 1x Nixeus NX_EDG27, 2x Dell S2440L (16:9)
Case Phanteks Enthoo Primo w/8 140mm SP Fans
Audio Device(s) onboard (realtek?) - SPKRS:Logitech Z623 200w 2.1
Power Supply Corsair HX1000i
Mouse Steeseries Esports Wireless
Keyboard Corsair K100
Software windows 10 H
Benchmark Scores https://i.imgur.com/aoz3vWY.jpg?2
Splitting the architecture and removing useless hardware, who could have guessed that would be an improvement...
 
Top