@W1zzard I have some questions regarding the latest update:
I heard GA102 was going to be used for 3080 / 3080 Ti / 3090, not just 3080 Ti and 3090. Where did you get a source stating the 3080 would use GA103? AFAIK, and I definitely could be wrong, GA103 was to be used for 3070, GA104 for 3060, etc. So the stack is essentially pushed up. In fact on the
"NVIDIA RTX 3080 / RTX 3080 Ti / RTX 3090 [added]" section, it mentions the three are on GA102, not that the 3080 uses GA103. Bit of an inconsistency. Also that section mentions a 3030 instead of a 3080.
Didn't Nvidia drop the "Tesla" branding for their server cards? (ref: NVIDIA Ampere section; Tesla server cards are going into Indiana University Big Red 200 supercomputer)
In the AMD Zen 3 section, you state:
- New process tech: 7 nm Plus (probably not 7 nm+ EUV)
- Uses EUV (extreme ultraviolet) silicon fabrication node at TSMC
One sort of contradicts the other, if I'm reading this correctly. Is this intentional?
Where do you get the pricing for the XT refreshes?
- Ryzen 9 3900 XT: 12c/24t, 4.1 GHz Base, 4.8 GHz Boost, 70 MB cache, 105 W, € 499
- Ryzen 7 3800 XT: 8c/16t, 4.2 GHz Base, 4.7 GHz Boost, 36 MB cache, 105 W, € 460
- Ryzen 5 3600 XT: 6c/12t, 4.0 GHz Base, 4.7 GHz Boost, 32 MB cache, 95 W, € 320
Seems like the 3800XT would be a completely useless part here. €39 more for 4 cores, almost twice the cache and a 0.1GHz boost increase (with the same TDP) by going to the 3900XT.. Seems like a no-brainer to me? Either the 3900XT is too cheap, or the 3800XT is too expensive. I can't imagine pricing like this, it's way too close. Where would the existing 3900X fall end up? Sandwiched between the 3800X and 3800XT? It just doesn't make sense to me.
Would love your input on these questions!