• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

GPU Test System Update March 2021

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
27,965 (3.71/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
So dirty Geforce FE cards. Are those used for mining?
Happens if you throw your cards around like this
 

Kirsebaer

New Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2020
Messages
4 (0.00/day)
Just curious: When you benchmark, do you set the pump and fan speed at 100%, or do you aim for a balanced cooling and noise level? I know e.g. Gamer's Nexus set the pump and fan speed to 100%, in order to not be limited by the cooling capacity. Personally I don't like that approach, but I get the idea.

By the way, would it be possible for you to do a quick Cinebench R20 test? I began to make a comparison between reviewers when Zen 3 was released, and I found quite a big discrepancy:

Especially when looking at the 5900X reviews:

Just curious where your system scores.
 

Durvelle27

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 10, 2012
Messages
6,797 (1.49/day)
Location
Memphis, TN
System Name Black Prometheus
Processor |AMD Ryzen 7 1700
Motherboard ASRock B550M Pro4|MSI X370 Gaming PLUS
Cooling Thermalright PA120 SE | AMD Stock Cooler
Memory G.Skill 64GB(2x32GB) 3200MHz | 32GB(4x8GB) DDR4
Video Card(s) ASUS DirectCU II R9 290 4GB
Storage Sandisk X300 512GB + WD Black 6TB+WD Black 6TB
Display(s) LG Nanocell85 49" 4K 120Hz + ACER AOPEN 34" 3440x1440 144Hz
Case DeepCool Matrexx 55 V3 w/ 6x120mm Intake + 3x120mm Exhaust
Audio Device(s) LG Dolby Atmos 5.1
Power Supply Corsair RMX850 Fully Modular| EVGA 750W G2
Mouse Logitech Trackman
Keyboard Logitech K350
Software Windows 10 EDU x64
Joined
Feb 1, 2013
Messages
1,270 (0.29/day)
System Name Gentoo64 /w Cold Coffee
Processor 9900K 5.2GHz @1.312v
Motherboard MXI APEX
Cooling Raystorm Pro + 1260mm Super Nova
Memory 2x16GB TridentZ 4000-14-14-28-2T @1.6v
Video Card(s) RTX 4090 LiquidX Barrow 3015MHz @1.1v
Storage 660P 1TB, 860 QVO 2TB
Display(s) LG C1 + Predator XB1 QHD
Case Open Benchtable V2
Audio Device(s) SB X-Fi
Power Supply MSI A1000G
Mouse G502
Keyboard G815
Software Gentoo/Windows 10
Benchmark Scores Always only ever very fast
DLSS - which option was tested? Quality, Balanced, Performance?
 
D

Deleted member 205776

Guest
All this resizable BAR talk makes me wonder. When AMD enables support for Ryzen 3000 CPUs to use it in AGESA 1.2.0.2, would I be able to enable it on my 3900X with my RTX 3070 when its resizable bar vbios is released?

Or is it only for RX 6000 cards?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
27,965 (3.71/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
would I be able to enable it on my 3900X with my RTX 3070 when its resizable bar vbios is released?
Yes, it works on any platform. You need to boot with UEFI, enable the resizable BAR option in mobo BIOS, have the NVIDIA VBIOS update and have the new NVIDIA driver
 
D

Deleted member 205776

Guest
Yes, it works on any platform. You need to boot with UEFI, enable the resizable BAR option in mobo BIOS, have the NVIDIA VBIOS update and have the new NVIDIA driver
Nice, will be patiently waiting for my card's new VBIOS to release.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2020
Messages
999 (0.59/day)
System Name S.L.I + RTX research rig
Processor Ryzen 7 5800X 3D.
Motherboard MSI MEG ACE X570
Cooling Corsair H150i Cappellx
Memory Corsair Vengeance pro RGB 3200mhz 32Gbs
Video Card(s) 2x Dell RTX 2080 Ti in S.L.I
Storage Western digital Sata 6.0 SDD 500gb + fanxiang S660 4TB PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2
Display(s) HP X24i
Case Corsair 7000D Airflow
Power Supply EVGA G+1600watts
Mouse Corsair Scimitar
Keyboard Cosair K55 Pro RGB
Multi GPU has been the scope of several previous special reviews, but nowadays it's simply not worth it because it's just a huge waste of money due to lack of game support
The last review I can find is from 2 1/2 years ago with 2080 TI and NV-link , The last AMD one was with crossfire RX 480 from almost over 5 years ago. Buying a gpu right now isn't worth the money and is a huge waste of money. Only like 0.2% of people are getting them anyways.

I'm only curious because this would move these cards away from a gpu bottleneck to a cpu bottleneck where it looks like a driver overhead becomes problem mostly on Nvidia currently.

Dual 6800 XT test (I don't think they used raytracing on any test)

Nvidia Has a Driver Overhead Problem, GeForce vs Radeon on Low-End CPUs

AMD vs NV Drivers: A Brief History and Understanding Scheduling & CPU Overhead

The lack of games with raytracing and mutl-gpu is annoying there's like two or three games I know of, Rise of The Tomb Raider, Shadow of the tomb raider , Deus ex Mankind divided.

I think DX12/ raytracing is a complete failure because of this.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 26, 2020
Messages
416 (0.23/day)
Location
Minbar
System Name Da Bisst
Processor Ryzen 5800X
Motherboard GigabyteB550 AORUS PRO
Cooling 2x280mm + 1x120 radiators, 4xArctic P14 PWM, 2xNoctua P12, TechN CPU, Alphacool Eisblock Auror GPU
Memory Corsair Vengeance RGB 32 GB DDR4 3800 MHz C16 tuned
Video Card(s) AMD PowerColor 6800XT
Storage Samsung 970 Evo Plus 512GB
Display(s) BenQ EX3501R
Case SilentiumPC Signum SG7V EVO TG ARGB
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply ChiefTec Proton Series 1000W (BDF-1000C)
Mouse Mionix Castor
Impressive job! But your Relative Performance charts when viewing Gpu's specs is different from these current numbers here. Is there a plan to update those too with the new data? And would there be a better way to display Relative Performance differently than it is today, as in most of the Gpu's are in the 1080 category, but the better ones are in the 4K category? What If one would want to buy a top card for 1080 and not 4k? Finally, thanks for these, general charts are always a good start for measuring performance over product stacks.
 

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
27,965 (3.71/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
But your Relative Performance charts when viewing Gpu's specs is different from these current numbers here. Is there a plan to update those too with the new data?
Yeah that is planned.

And would there be a better way to display Relative Performance differently than it is today, as in most of the Gpu's are in the 1080 category, but the better ones are in the 4K category? What If one would want to buy a top card for 1080 and not 4k?
Any suggestions? Obviously the mix of 1080p and 4K performance data is not perfect, but it's the best we came up with. The primary objective for the GPU Database is to keep the chart simple, give a basic understanding of performance. There's no way one number can be 100% accurate. If that was possible, GPU reviews would be one chart, and not 20+ games :)
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2020
Messages
416 (0.23/day)
Location
Minbar
System Name Da Bisst
Processor Ryzen 5800X
Motherboard GigabyteB550 AORUS PRO
Cooling 2x280mm + 1x120 radiators, 4xArctic P14 PWM, 2xNoctua P12, TechN CPU, Alphacool Eisblock Auror GPU
Memory Corsair Vengeance RGB 32 GB DDR4 3800 MHz C16 tuned
Video Card(s) AMD PowerColor 6800XT
Storage Samsung 970 Evo Plus 512GB
Display(s) BenQ EX3501R
Case SilentiumPC Signum SG7V EVO TG ARGB
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply ChiefTec Proton Series 1000W (BDF-1000C)
Mouse Mionix Castor
Yeah that is planned.


Any suggestions? Obviously the mix of 1080p and 4K performance data is not perfect, but it's the best we came up with. The primary objective for the GPU Database is to keep the chart simple, give a basic understanding of performance. There's no way one number can be 100% accurate. If that was possible, GPU reviews would be one chart, and not 20+ games :)
I do have a suggestion, but not sure how easy it would be to implement, the suggestion being have 3 clickable resolution pickers in the Relative Performance tab, for 1k, 2k, 4k, and single clicking on each would dynamically show the dataset for that given resolution. That would also make the list a lot more fancy function wise, but I guess that's not something you can easily do, would be awesome though :D
 
Joined
Aug 8, 2016
Messages
89 (0.03/day)
System Name Evo PC
Processor AMD Ryzen 5800X3D
Motherboard Asus X470 Prime Pro
Cooling Noctua NH15
Memory G.Skill Ripjaws 32GB 3,600MHz
Video Card(s) Gigabyte Aorus RX 7900XTX Gaming OC
Storage 1TB WD SN750/512GB Samsung 870 EVO
Display(s) LG UltraGear 27 2K 165Hz
Case Fractal Define C Glass
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium
Power Supply Supernova G2 1000
Mouse MSI Vigor GM11
Keyboard Corsair K55 Pro RGB
Good idea! I always knew that this nVidia overhead would become serious in the long term since the Kepler architecture, their software stack had become bloated and while they had been doing good strides with the software scheduling, this constant change from 192 CUDAs per SMX to 128 and then to 64 and now back to 128 shows that something fishy is going on.
 
Joined
Mar 21, 2009
Messages
45 (0.01/day)
Processor 9700k
Motherboard asrock z390 extreme4
Video Card(s) 5700
Display(s) benq xl2411p 144hz 1080p
holy shit at AMD and radeon vii. wtf

Comedy gold.
" Luckily, I found the updated BIOS in our VGA BIOS collection, and the card is working perfectly now."
comedy gold indeed
 
Joined
Apr 16, 2019
Messages
632 (0.30/day)
I think it would have been prudent to wait for Rocket Lake, especially less then a month before its release and considering the fact that the jump from 9900k to 5800x brings maybe 2-3% difference. Honestly it would have been fine just sticking with 9900k (you could probably even get away with 8700k still, of course delidded and really well OCed) until Alder Lake (and I guess maybe also Zen4) land. When the differences are so small, it makes more sense to just keep the same testing platform for better consistency and easy comparison between several dozen gpus of several generatios.
 
Top