Shadow of the Tomb Raider benchmark

[Det0x]

Any 11700k's here?

 

[Felix123BU]

Any 11700k's here?

Don't think so, all the 11700k's went into hiding out of shame for the leaked samples

 

[Det0x]

Don't think so, all the 11700k's went into hiding out of shame for the leaked samples

Nizzen from overclockers.net is sharing some numbers on this norwegian forum (where iam also from)

Shadow of the tomb raider benchmark-tråden

translate.google.com

Shadow of the tomb raider benchmark-tråden

www.diskusjon.no

 

[Felix123BU]

Nizzen from overclockers.net is sharing some numbers on this norwegian forum (where iam also from)

Shadow of the tomb raider benchmark-tråden

translate.google.com

Shadow of the tomb raider benchmark-tråden

www.diskusjon.no

poor Intel, they really cant catch a brake. Would have been nice to see a bench at Highest with TAA, not at Medium and no AA from that 11700k

 

[IchigoQc]

INTEL 10700K stock chipset B460 so memory is locked @2933MHZ (I know I can't overclock with B460, will upgrade later .... been more then 8 years since I build a PC, OC was a standard feature back then ) MSI RTX 2060 Ventus XS OC with AIO ... the stock cooler was horrible couldn't bear the sound of it.

 

[jboydgolfer]

i need to finish upgrading my PC. its bad when your GPU has nearly twice as much memory as your entire PC.

 

[Taraquin]

i need to finish upgrading my PC. its bad when your GPU has nearly twice as much memory as your entire PC.

View attachment 191295

Your 8600K seems to be underperforming. Have you tweaked ram/oc cpu?

 

[Felix123BU]

Your 8600K seems to be underperforming. Have you tweaked ram/oc cpu?

That and this game reaaaally liking moar cores, I had a 20 FPS bum from going from a 5600X to a 5800X, and a friend with a 5900X and the same GPU and equivalent ram settings gets 10 FPS more than my 8 core

 

[harm9963]

That and this game reaaaally liking moar cores, I had a 20 FPS bum from going from a 5600X to a 5800X, and a friend with a 5900X and the same GPU and equivalent ram settings gets 10 FPS more than my 8 core

I had 2700X _ 122 then a 5800X _132 and now 5950X _ 140

 

[Taraquin]

I had 2700X _ 122 then a 5800X _132 and now 5950X _ 140

Look at the avg on CPU-game. That is the important one that shows how many fps your CPU is producing. Going from the stock 3000cl16-ram xmp on my Ryzen 3600 to 3733cl15 with dram calc I got 163fps. That is a 25% better CPU-score from ram-tweaking alone.

 

[Splinterdog]

First one with FreeSync off
View attachment 126987

And FreeSync on - 2 fps gained
View attachment 126988

These are a big improvement over the 2600X/RX580 with both being at 1080p/Ultra/DX12.

 

[Taraquin]

These are a big improvement over the 2600X/RX580 with both being at 1080p/Ultra/DX12.
View attachment 191585

View attachment 191586

Done anything with your ram? Your cpu score is lower than what I get with my Ryzen 3600. With modest ram tweaking you should get 200+ fps on cpu-game Tried dram calc?

 

[Splinterdog]

Done anything with your ram? Your cpu score is lower than what I get with my Ryzen 3600. With modest ram tweaking you should get 200+ fps on cpu-game Tried dram calc?

With respect, you're comparing apples to oranges because your 3060Ti GPU is much more powerful than mine.
And no, I haven't overclocked the RAM from its default 2400Mhz just yet.

 

[Taraquin]

With respect, you're comparing apples to oranges because your 3060Ti GPU is much more powerful than mine.
And no, I haven't overclocked the RAM from its default 2400Mhz just yet.

No, I had the 5700XT before. Cpu game avg score is the same with 5700XT and 3060ti. It shows how many fps the cpu generates, gpu game shows how many fps the gpu produces. Just a tip if you want to improve cpu performance Dram calc 3733 fast preset raised my score from 130 to over 160 fps.

 

[Splinterdog]

No, I had the 5700XT before. Cpu game avg score is the same with 5700XT and 3060ti. It shows how many fps the cpu generates, gpu game shows how many fps the gpu produces. Just a tip if you want to improve cpu performance Dram calc 3733 fast preset raised my score from 130 to over 160 fps.

Thanks for your advice, but for the moment I'm more than happy with the performance

 

[INSTG8R]

With respect, you're comparing apples to oranges because your 3060Ti GPU is much more powerful than mine.
And no, I haven't overclocked the RAM from its default 2400Mhz just yet.

I have a fairly identical setup but not the game, it’s coming to Game Pass I‘ve wanted to run the bench so I’ll definitely post results for comparison when it‘s available. But you should definitely give your RAM a kick regardless may not show better FPS but you’re holding your CPU back at such low speeds I hope your Time Spy score is old because mine is double that.

 

[Det0x]

Scrubs
View attachment 190106
*edit*
Forgot to include "framecounter", so other run
View attachment 190107

Testrun of my new everyday 24/7 settings:
273 fps average CPU Game

PS: Nvidia Rebar lowers the CPU game numbers by ~10-15 fps, recommend to turn it off

 

[mrthanhnguyen]

Testrun of my new everyday 24/7 settings:
273 fps average CPU Game
View attachment 195061
View attachment 195060
PS: Nvidia Rebar lowers the CPU game numbers by ~10-15 fps, recommend to turn it off

highest setting.

 

[Det0x]

highest setting.

This again ? Why ?
If you want highest setting you can look at this screenshot instead:

Dont matter if you run 1080p@medium or 4k@highest, you get the same "CPU Game" score either way (within run to run variance)

Reference for a highly optimized intel system 1440p vs 2160: https://www.techpowerup.com/forums/...-raider-benchmark.250511/page-11#post-4450321
1080p vs 5k: https://www.techpowerup.com/forums/...-raider-benchmark.250511/page-11#post-4457340
1080p vs 1440p vs 2160p: https://www.techpowerup.com/forums/threads/shadow-of-the-tomb-raider-benchmark.250511/page-10

The reason for me using exactly 1080 medium is because it was the settings for this thread: https://www.diskusjon.no/topic/1888561-shadow-of-the-tomb-raider-benchmark-tråden/

But like i said above, it makes no difference for "CPU Game" score.

 

[Taraquin]

This again ? Why ?
If you want highest setting you can look at this screenshot instead:View attachment 195079

It was decided by the starter of the tread StefanM for unknown reasons. I think many here are more interested in the real avg fps than cpu game which they don't understand. You, me and a few other prefer the cpu game stats to see how the cpu performs, but I guess we are a minority.

 

[Felix123BU]

This again ? Why ?
If you want highest setting you can look at this screenshot instead:View attachment 195079

Why? Because this thread is about 1080 Highest, because all followed this from the beginning, and by throwing in random setting you dilute the results.

Now, I can very much agree that this game is an oddity, the moar cores you throw at it, the better your FPS will be, each extra 2 cores will give extra frames, going up to 16/32, and in that regard, the CPU game is sort of more interesting. But that should be the subject of another thread.

 

[Det0x]

If you want to bench the GPU, use 3dmark.
The rest of the world use this benchmark as a cpu/memeory bench, not a 99% limited GPU bench.

But by all means, have at it

If threadstarter StefanM wanted to keep a leaderboard on page1 i could see the need conform to a single setting, but as it stands now, 90% of the results here are from unoptimized systems, from people who dont know how to tweak a system..

"Now, I can very much agree that this game is an oddity, the moar cores you throw at it, the better your FPS will be, each extra 2 cores will give extra frames, going up to 16/32, and in that regard, the CPU game is sort of more interesting. But that should be the subject of another thread.

No, this game dont scale with cores/threads past a certain point.. 250+ fps CPU Game is not hard with a 8core zen3 cpu (5800x)

Russian SoTB benchthread uses 720p lowest, Scandinavian use 1080p medium. overclockers.net use whatever.

 

[Felix123BU]

If you want to bench the GPU, use 3dmark.
The rest of the world use this benchmark as a cpu/memeory bench, not a 99% limited GPU bench.

But by all means, have at it
View attachment 195098

If threadstarter StefanM wanted to keep a leaderboard on page1 i could see the need conform to a single setting, but as it stands now, 90% of the results here are from unoptimized systems, from people who dont know how to tweak a system..


No, this game dont scale with cores/threads past a certain point.. 250+ fps CPU Game is not hard with a 8core zen3 cpu (5800x)

Russian SoTB benchthread uses 720p lowest, Scandinavian use 1080p medium. overclockers.net use whatever.

Dude, you are being an ass for no good reason. We all have a gazillion opinions on a variety of topics. This thread was meant for 1080 Highest. If you don't like it, or don't agree with it, start another thread where you can show the whole world that you are right and everybody else is wrong. Or post whatever you like without being disrespectful to the other members of this thread.

 

[Det0x]

Dude, you are being an ass for no good reason. We all have a gazillion opinions on a variety of topics. This thread was meant for 1080 Highest. If you don't like it, or don't agree with it, start another thread where you can show the whole world that you are right and everybody else is wrong. Or post whatever you like without being disrespectful to the other members of this thread.

Maybe you think I'm being disrespectful, but could that have something to do with people commenting on things they dont understand/know what they are talking about ?

Would be more meaningful comparing apples to apples.

All these custom settings are pointless.

I was like goood damn, 282, but then I saw Medium settings

Seems like to me some of you guys didn't know "CPU Game" is not affected by quality, resolution nor renderscale. ?

And that's why this game is a popular benchmark for cpu/memory, as it scales very well with tweaking of memory timings and latency.. GFX dont matter here.. But ofcourse if you want to brag about your epeen 3090 which require no knowledge to get a high GPU score with, and maybe keep your 1440p highscore, then graphic score is the most important and only highest settings should be used i guess, but tough luck, it didn't make it. I simply dont find it interesting to benchmark graphic cards in SotTR.

And i think i have been sharing usefull information about how the different game versions affect game scores (free version vs paid version) and how rebar (resizable bar) affects scoring, but if you think iam an ass then so be it. But i mostly think that have something to do with how you comment on others first, use Taraquin as an example if you want to have a better tone.

 

[Felix123BU]

Maybe you think I'm being disrespectful, but could that have something to do with people commenting on things they dont understand/know what they are talking about ?



Seems like to me some of you guys didn't know "CPU Game" is not affected by quality, resolution nor renderscale. ?

And that's why this game is a popular benchmark for cpu/memory, as it scales very well with tweaking of memory timings and latency.. GFX dont matter here.. But ofcourse if you want to brag about your epeen 3090 which require no knowledge to get a high GPU score with, and maybe keep your 1440p highscore, then graphic score is the most important and only highest numbers should be used i guess, but tough luck, it didn't make it. I simply dont find it interesting to benchmark graphic cards in SotTR.

And i think i have been sharing usefull information about how the different game versions affect game scores (free version vs paid version) and how rebar (resizable bar) affects scoring, but if you think iam an ass then so be it. But i mostly think that have something to do with how you comment on others first, use Taraquin as an example if you want to have a better tone.

Again, "Maybe you think I'm being disrespectful, but could that have something to do with people commenting on things they don't understand/know what they are talking about ?" is disrespectful.
This thread is and was from its beginning comparing results of 1080 Highest in SOTR, not debating the influences of the human mind on the universe, or alternatively CPU scores in SOTR. Do you understand?

And yeah, CPU score and subsequently CPU performance are hugely important for higher FPS in this game, nobody I think is debating that, and it might help some, but that does not change the fact that this thread was created for comparing performance at a certain setting, namely once again, 1080 Highest. There have been enough posts with 1080 Highest and a combo of 2K, 4K, and people also discussing the influence of CPU ingame, of Rebar or Ram tuning.

Coming in and shitting on everybody because they don't see your wisdom, even though being politely reminded on several occasions that here people compare 1080 Highest, is highly disrespectful and rude.

Nobody would have had anything against you posting helpful stuff, me included, but when your messages read like "listen dumb posters here, I have the ultimate knowledge, you are all dumb sheep that don't get what shit is about, I am the best thing that happened to your lives" you sound disrespectful towards all who posted in this tread and somehow managed to select settings for 1080 Highest, post the results, and have conversations about it. Again, nobody said you can not chat about anything game related, but a minimum show of respect would have been starting your rant with a post of 1080 Highest, then crapping on the world for not thinking like you and trying to hijack the thread.