Ok folks, testing is done.
Let's state the particulars.
The system being used is a Dell Precision T3500 with an Intel Xeon W3680 using the stock cooler and a steady state 3700RPM 92mm fan. The testing software was Prime95. Temp monitoring software is HWInfo. The thermal interface materials being tested are as follows:
Dragon Star DRG102, compound very similar to Arctic Silver 5
Automotive Copper thread grease
Noctua NT-H1
Arctic Cooling MX-5
The tests were conducted as follows:
3 runs of 2 stages of Prime95 calculations which run for a little over 11 minutes per each TIM.
Here is how each was applied. I did not take photos of the Noctua NT-H1 as I forgot to. It didn't look any different than the DRG102.
DRG102
Copper Grease
MX-5
As you can see, I spread the TIM out in very thin layers. The DRG102 and Copper Grease were the easiest to spread evenly. NT-H1 was a little more difficult but only a bit. MX-5 was a bit of challenge but with a few minutes of work it spread out fine. It is as "sticky" as everyone claims of course, however this is a minor thing.
Here are the test results.
Dragon Star DRG102
This performance ranks third best in the tests.
Automotive Cooper thread grease
This performance ranks fourth in the tests.
Noctua NT-H1
This performance was second best in the tests.
Arctic Cooling MX-5
This performance was the best of the tests.
My conclusion is that MX-5 is a very impressive TIM. It bested NT-H1 by several degrees C in both idle and full load tests. It also bested the DRG102 handily. The copper grease proved inferior to the rest, even though the temps were within reason as expected given that the compound was used in this same system for nearly a year and performed well. NT-H1 is widely regarded as a premium TIM and has shown itself to be an excellent performer. For MX-5 to perform better than such shows it to be, at the very least, competitive with premium TIM's and at most superior to many of the of the top shelf brand TIMs.
The screenshots are here for you all to draw your own conclusions though.
IMPORTANT EDIT;
For the record, this testing was done as much for fun as it was out of scientific, professional and personal curiosity. The testing methodologies used are based on known valid methods but are NOT all inclusive. I'm NOT going to test every TIM on the market, nor am I going to test on a multitude of platforms. These tests are focused on the topic of discussion here, Arctic Cooling MX-5. I deliberately chose to use a TIM that is a budget known good performer, a product not specifically designed for the purpose at hand(for giggles and to be an odd-ball) and a TIM that is considered to be a premium product for testing against MX-5.
That said, if you have a problem or complaint about the testing methods used or the fact that the products tested were limited, feel free to buy your own products to test, spend your own time conducting said testing and then post your own results. Whining about what I did or didn't do that somehow doesn't meet with your satisfaction will only earn you an unpleasant reaction, which will likely include open and public mocking.
Only warning.