• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Core i5-12600K

Joined
Jan 1, 2021
Messages
1,067 (0.74/day)
System Name The Sparing-No-Expense Build
Processor Ryzen 5 5600X
Motherboard Asus ROG Strix X570-E Gaming Wifi II
Cooling Noctua NH-U12S chromax.black
Memory 32GB: 2x16GB Patriot Viper Steel 3600MHz C18
Video Card(s) NVIDIA RTX 3060Ti Founder's Edition
Storage 500GB 970 Evo Plus NVMe, 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) AOC C24G1 144Hz 24" 1080p Monitor
Case Lian Li O11 Dynamic EVO White
Power Supply Seasonic X-650 Gold PSU (SS-650KM3)
Software Windows 11 Home 64-bit
@W1zzard What do you think about using a separate PSU when doing CPU tests to see how much only the CPU is consuming?

LTT did it in this video but I'm not sure if it's an effective method.
 
Joined
Jan 27, 2015
Messages
1,733 (0.48/day)
System Name Legion
Processor i7-12700KF
Motherboard Asus Z690-Plus TUF Gaming WiFi D5
Cooling Arctic Liquid Freezer 2 240mm AIO
Memory PNY MAKO DDR5-6000 C36-36-36-76
Video Card(s) PowerColor Hellhound 6700 XT 12GB
Storage WD SN770 512GB m.2, Samsung 980 Pro m.2 2TB
Display(s) Acer K272HUL 1440p / 34" MSI MAG341CQ 3440x1440
Case Montech Air X
Power Supply Corsair CX750M
Mouse Logitech MX Anywhere 25
Keyboard Logitech MX Keys
Software Lots
According to Igor Lab's review (<- linked here) where they measure CPU power consumption when gaming -

and measure watts consumed per fps

Alder Lake is doing very very well.


This mirrors what I've seen at some other sites, including Anandtech. Peak load benchmarks have really always just been troll bait.
 
Joined
Oct 10, 2018
Messages
943 (0.42/day)
Overall it is a great improvement from Intel, definetely on the right track, and taking performance as well. I would not call it an ryzen destroyer though. This is why I love competitive competition, just that with all this ruckus about manufacturing availability, everyone raised prices on every compenent makes it really hard to adjust to this new world economics so soon.
 
Joined
Jan 27, 2015
Messages
1,733 (0.48/day)
System Name Legion
Processor i7-12700KF
Motherboard Asus Z690-Plus TUF Gaming WiFi D5
Cooling Arctic Liquid Freezer 2 240mm AIO
Memory PNY MAKO DDR5-6000 C36-36-36-76
Video Card(s) PowerColor Hellhound 6700 XT 12GB
Storage WD SN770 512GB m.2, Samsung 980 Pro m.2 2TB
Display(s) Acer K272HUL 1440p / 34" MSI MAG341CQ 3440x1440
Case Montech Air X
Power Supply Corsair CX750M
Mouse Logitech MX Anywhere 25
Keyboard Logitech MX Keys
Software Lots
12600K power draw at max draw 720p testing on multiple games.

No 5600X here but 12600K is by far the most efficient of the higher performance gaming CPUs :

1636053291934.png
 
Joined
Oct 23, 2020
Messages
671 (0.44/day)
Location
Austria
System Name nope
Processor I3 10100F
Motherboard ATM Gigabyte h410
Cooling Arctic 12 passive
Memory ATM Gskill 1x 8GB NT Series (No Heatspreader bling bling garbage, just Black DIMMS)
Video Card(s) Sapphire HD7770 and EVGA GTX 470 and Zotac GTX 960
Storage 120GB OS SSD, 240GB M2 Sata, 240GB M2 NVME, 300GB HDD, 500GB HDD
Display(s) Nec EA 241 WM
Case Coolermaster whatever
Audio Device(s) Onkyo on TV and Mi Bluetooth on Screen
Power Supply Super Flower Leadx 550W
Mouse Steelseries Rival Fnatic
Keyboard Logitech K270 Wireless
Software Deepin, BSD and 10 LTSC
They are to expensive but a 12600k took the crown back to intel against 5950/5900X in games :laugh:

If i would buy new, then a 12600K and not that poor 12 or 16 cores from AMD :nutkick:
 
Joined
Apr 16, 2019
Messages
632 (0.31/day)
Overall it is a great improvement from Intel, definetely on the right track, and taking performance as well. I would not call it an ryzen destroyer though. This is why I love competitive competition, just that with all this ruckus about manufacturing availability, everyone raised prices on every compenent makes it really hard to adjust to this new world economics so soon.
Not completely, but it does destroy their mid-high range (5600x - 5900x), while in the lower to mid end they've been successfully taken out by ... themselves by not offering anything worth buying under $300. The only AMD chip therefore with some advantages left is the 5950x and that's mostly if you do lots and lots of cpu renders.
 
Joined
Jan 1, 2021
Messages
1,067 (0.74/day)
System Name The Sparing-No-Expense Build
Processor Ryzen 5 5600X
Motherboard Asus ROG Strix X570-E Gaming Wifi II
Cooling Noctua NH-U12S chromax.black
Memory 32GB: 2x16GB Patriot Viper Steel 3600MHz C18
Video Card(s) NVIDIA RTX 3060Ti Founder's Edition
Storage 500GB 970 Evo Plus NVMe, 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) AOC C24G1 144Hz 24" 1080p Monitor
Case Lian Li O11 Dynamic EVO White
Power Supply Seasonic X-650 Gold PSU (SS-650KM3)
Software Windows 11 Home 64-bit
tested Alder Lake on 2 x 16GB DDR5-6000 36-36-36-76 1T memories
So? Nowhere in the review does a reviewer say that the user has to have the exact same config as what the review has. They only say that to replicate the results you have to have the same setup.

The RAM has to be the fastest possible so that the only bottleneck is the CPU. Honestly, you should read more reviews.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
7,563 (1.77/day)
No 5600X here but 12600K is by far the most efficient of the higher performance gaming CPUs :
You do realize you're quoting efficiency numbers for the CPU in what's generally a GPU heavy task i.e. gaming o_O

I assume you also have the GPU locked at a certain frequency & normalized the results with other variables taken care of?
 
Joined
Apr 28, 2021
Messages
42 (0.03/day)
TPU why do you censor statements by changing the sense of metaphors used in the comments?

Where is the announced AMD pogrom? Just under 5% at 1440p is a joke considering the extremely high temperatures on such a large cooling system, not to mention the enormous power consumption.

Intel's marketing did a good job of driving the hype around Alder Lake. 12th gen of Intel Core is like reactivate the Pentium 4 (temperatures and power consumption).

Intel will collect a nice mant from Zen3+ : D
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 23, 2020
Messages
671 (0.44/day)
Location
Austria
System Name nope
Processor I3 10100F
Motherboard ATM Gigabyte h410
Cooling Arctic 12 passive
Memory ATM Gskill 1x 8GB NT Series (No Heatspreader bling bling garbage, just Black DIMMS)
Video Card(s) Sapphire HD7770 and EVGA GTX 470 and Zotac GTX 960
Storage 120GB OS SSD, 240GB M2 Sata, 240GB M2 NVME, 300GB HDD, 500GB HDD
Display(s) Nec EA 241 WM
Case Coolermaster whatever
Audio Device(s) Onkyo on TV and Mi Bluetooth on Screen
Power Supply Super Flower Leadx 550W
Mouse Steelseries Rival Fnatic
Keyboard Logitech K270 Wireless
Software Deepin, BSD and 10 LTSC
Not completely, but it does destroy their mid-high range (5600x - 5900x), while in the lower to mid end they've been successfully taken out by ... themselves by not offering anything worth buying under $300. The only AMD chip therefore with some advantages left is the 5950x and that's mostly if you do lots and lots of cpu renders.
yeah they take em self out, no competition to 10400 or 11400.

AMD have for the same prices only a 1200 12nm (130€ like 10400) or a 3600 (169€ like a 11400)
 
Joined
Apr 16, 2019
Messages
632 (0.31/day)
You do realize you're quoting efficiency numbers for the CPU in what's generally a GPU heavy task i.e. gaming o_O

I assume you also have the GPU locked at a certain frequency & normalized the results with other variables taken care of?
720p is a GPU heavy task? :rolleyes: It's great that he found that table, because hopefully it will lay to rest at least some of the blatantly false statements about Intel also using up a lot more power in gaming, just like the one ultra-fanboy comment below yours. But knowing how hard-headed the redsters are, probably not many... :D
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
7,563 (1.77/day)
720p is a GPU heavy task? :rolleyes: It's great that he found that table, because hopefully it will lay to rest at least some of the blatantly false statements about Intel also using up a lot more power in gaming, just like the one ultra-fanboy comment below yours. But knowing how hard-headed the redsters are, probably not many... :D
It is a "gaming" task so yeah I would say it's generally GPU heavy ~ I'm not comparing it to 4k if that's what you're thinking! Btw I'm waiting for those GPU power numbers on 720p gaming, do you have those?
 
Joined
Jan 27, 2015
Messages
1,733 (0.48/day)
System Name Legion
Processor i7-12700KF
Motherboard Asus Z690-Plus TUF Gaming WiFi D5
Cooling Arctic Liquid Freezer 2 240mm AIO
Memory PNY MAKO DDR5-6000 C36-36-36-76
Video Card(s) PowerColor Hellhound 6700 XT 12GB
Storage WD SN770 512GB m.2, Samsung 980 Pro m.2 2TB
Display(s) Acer K272HUL 1440p / 34" MSI MAG341CQ 3440x1440
Case Montech Air X
Power Supply Corsair CX750M
Mouse Logitech MX Anywhere 25
Keyboard Logitech MX Keys
Software Lots
FPS per watt in gaming :

Edit : So, I did not notice this before but the DDR5 12900K is notably more efficient than the DDR4 based variants. About 15% more efficient than the DDR4 with the same 241/241 PL1/PL2 power settings.

1636054663584.png
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
7,563 (1.77/day)
Which clearly shows the huge variability in results ~ is the DDR4 based test consuming more watts because the IMC is less efficient than the one for DDR5 or is it something else? When the GPU itself is probably consuming more in a task than the CPU it's not really a "CPU efficiency" test but carry on :ohwell:
 
Joined
Apr 16, 2019
Messages
632 (0.31/day)
It IS a CPU efficiency test for gaming! Denying this just shows you are one of the above described as well.
 
Joined
Jun 29, 2018
Messages
542 (0.23/day)
FPS per watt in gaming :

Edit : So, I did not notice this before but the DDR5 12900K is notably more efficient than the DDR4 based variants. About 15% more efficient than the DDR4 with the same 241/241 PL1/PL2 power settings.
I wish there was a 5600X and 5800X in both your sources. I wonder how much difference that second chiplet in Ryzens makes.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
7,563 (1.77/day)
You can't do an "efficiency" test with half the power being consumed omitted from your charts, WTH are you on about? Still waiting for those GPU power numbers :rolleyes:
It IS a CPU efficiency test for gaming! Denying this just shows you are one of the above described as well.
I had someone on AT use the same BS numbers for "gaming IPC" ~ suffice to say that's another BS metric for basically what can be termed as "horse manure" in polite terms!
 
Joined
Jun 8, 2005
Messages
207 (0.03/day)
You can't do an "efficiency" test with half the power being consumed omitted from your charts, WTH are you on about? Still waiting for those GPU power numbers :rolleyes:
You're literally not understanding the concept here. The efficiency is only from the CPU perspective of the test, on purpose, to show the efficiency of the CPU power usage during said testing... It's not that hard to comprehend, come on.
 
Joined
Apr 16, 2019
Messages
632 (0.31/day)
You'll keep on waiting then, I certainly won't use a single minute trying to find them for someone who flat out denies the category in the first place. ;)
 
Joined
Jan 27, 2015
Messages
1,733 (0.48/day)
System Name Legion
Processor i7-12700KF
Motherboard Asus Z690-Plus TUF Gaming WiFi D5
Cooling Arctic Liquid Freezer 2 240mm AIO
Memory PNY MAKO DDR5-6000 C36-36-36-76
Video Card(s) PowerColor Hellhound 6700 XT 12GB
Storage WD SN770 512GB m.2, Samsung 980 Pro m.2 2TB
Display(s) Acer K272HUL 1440p / 34" MSI MAG341CQ 3440x1440
Case Montech Air X
Power Supply Corsair CX750M
Mouse Logitech MX Anywhere 25
Keyboard Logitech MX Keys
Software Lots
I wish there was a 5600X and 5800X in both your sources. I wonder how much difference that second chiplet in Ryzens makes.

Yes that is missing. I think those would be pretty efficient as well, since the 5900X has higher clocks and high clocks = low efficiency. Nevertheless 5900X and 5950X are losing from an efficiency / power perspective in gaming and it appears based on the PCWorld graph in productivity too.

Another thing to note is that the 12900K is locked max power 241W. It will beat the 5900X/5950X in games handily at that setting, but technically it can go to higher power limits and be a little bit faster too. The choice to use that extra power for a couple percent is of course up to the user.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
7,563 (1.77/day)
to show the efficiency of the CPU power usage during said testing
And again that's a huge variable in & of itself! You do realize with unlimited turbo the power consumption numbers can vary greatly from board to board? Depending largely on the clocks. If it was really something that useful, or consistent, more outlets like AT or TPU would test it.
 
Top