Thanks for the gift of strong laughs.
Find an well trained economist, so him to explain to you, of what is the actual amount of goods that China import, in contrast to the actual amount of China exports.
In the past years, the Americans use the tariff system so to force Asians getting more American cars, did not work then either.
So, let me just assume that some of this is lost in translation to whatever your native language is. I say this...because half of the responses here are very difficult to parse because they leave a lot to interpretation.
As far as economists go...you are missing the point. Let's explore the philosophy. You make widget A, and another country also makes widget A. The cost of labor in your country is double that of your competitor, and 25% of the cost is labor. This means that instead of the 100% cost you have to charge 112.5% to make the same amount of money.
You then go to your government, and push for an import tax. Said tax is placed at 13%...so the end consumer sees Widget A from you at 112.5% of the old cost, and the import widget A at 113% of the old cost. The consumer actually has to pay more period...to protect your business from competition.
Wow...that sounds like collectivism, rather than capitalism...oh right, it is. It's a government protecting local production, so advantages that other locations have cannot decimate domestic industries. In this instance the increased taxation is not paid by the people making the thing, it's paid by the end consumer to the government.
So, looking at this what is the logic here? Well, the US and China imposed trade tariffs on one another. The goal was to hit trade exports heavily, without damaging domestic production. In this case, China taxed US soybeans and the US taxed Chinese electronics. China hit that because foodstuffs are a surprisingly large export, whereas manufacturing of electronics is a huge deal.
Endgame...you've put the cart before the horse. If you have no domestic production of a good, then imposing tariffs only works if there are competing suppliers. China absolutely wants this. It's less of a carrot, and more of an iron infusion for a hemophylliac. It's not going to be the cure of everything, but it does a lot to alleviate huge short term problems. As far as the US...it's likely a cookie for a diabetic. Bad for them, but also a good stop-gap when there aren't a lot of ways to get what you want.
(edit)
To clarify, electronics are the cookie.
Iron is a food supply.
China is the original producer of Widget A.
Taiwan is the new competitor...that's much more palatable as an alternative.