Space Lynx
Astronaut
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2014
- Messages
- 17,262 (4.67/day)
- Location
- Kepler-186f
Processor | 7800X3D -25 all core ($196) |
---|---|
Motherboard | B650 Steel Legend ($179) |
Cooling | Frost Commander 140 ($42) |
Memory | 32gb ddr5 (2x16) cl 30 6000 ($80) |
Video Card(s) | Merc 310 7900 XT @3100 core $(705) |
Display(s) | Agon 27" QD-OLED Glossy 240hz 1440p ($399) |
Case | NZXT H710 (Red/Black) ($60) |
I have been thinking about this a lot lately, like let's say it works really really well... we already know they have released some genetically modified mosquitoes in Florida, to reduce the population number.
What if they did the same with ticks? I just read this article below, that says they can alter DNA of ticks now too... and ticks are a big problem... especially for deer of late if I recall correctly, and humans.
Now bring in dogs and cats, etc - fleas are the historic cause for many diseases coming from fleas. (to my knowledge we can't alter DNA of fleas yet... but it is probably around the corner?)
What if we simply got rid of all three of these? I know birds eat some of them, but honestly when I watch birds in nature, most of the time they get a worm from the ground. Are the worms reliant on any of these three creatures? Where at in the cycle of life do these 3 creatures come into play is what I suppose I am asking? I know bats eat some of them, but what eats bats? What is the cyclical effect of one species ending and another thriving?
Many species have died over the years, mainly due to human intervention, or due to climate shifts millions of years ago, etc... so why exactly do we need the tick/flea/mosquito to stick around? Thoughts?
I'm genuinely curious about this stuff, do you think scientists are making a mistake by controlling these populations, or not going far enough and no reason to keep them around?
What if they did the same with ticks? I just read this article below, that says they can alter DNA of ticks now too... and ticks are a big problem... especially for deer of late if I recall correctly, and humans.
Gene editing now possible in ticks
Researchers have successfully used CRISPR-Cas9 to edit the genomes of the black-legged tick. To accomplish this feat, they developed an embryo injection protocol that overcame a major barrier in the field.
www.sciencedaily.com
Why a U.S. Company Plans to Release 2.4 Billion Genetically Modified Mosquitoes
The insects, created by biotech firm Oxitec, will be non-biting males engineered to only produce viable male offspring, per the company
www.smithsonianmag.com
Now bring in dogs and cats, etc - fleas are the historic cause for many diseases coming from fleas. (to my knowledge we can't alter DNA of fleas yet... but it is probably around the corner?)
What if we simply got rid of all three of these? I know birds eat some of them, but honestly when I watch birds in nature, most of the time they get a worm from the ground. Are the worms reliant on any of these three creatures? Where at in the cycle of life do these 3 creatures come into play is what I suppose I am asking? I know bats eat some of them, but what eats bats? What is the cyclical effect of one species ending and another thriving?
Many species have died over the years, mainly due to human intervention, or due to climate shifts millions of years ago, etc... so why exactly do we need the tick/flea/mosquito to stick around? Thoughts?
I'm genuinely curious about this stuff, do you think scientists are making a mistake by controlling these populations, or not going far enough and no reason to keep them around?
Last edited: